You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by di...@covalent.net on 2002/03/27 18:29:54 UTC
Email addresses in changes file
Anyone think it is a good idea if I did a
s/@/_at_/g
on the email addresses in the Changes file ?
Dw.
--
Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Re: Email addresses in changes file
Posted by Brian Pane <br...@cnet.com>.
dirkx@covalent.net wrote:
>Anyone think it is a good idea if I did a
>
> s/@/_at_/g
>
>on the email addresses in the Changes file ?
>
+1.
Maybe also "s/\./ DOT /g"
--Brian
Re: Email addresses in changes file
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org>.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:42:48AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:36:31AM -0800, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 dirkx@covalent.net wrote:
> > > Anyone think it is a good idea if I did a
> > >
> > > s/@/_at_/g
> > >
> > > on the email addresses in the Changes file ?
> >
> > -0
> >
> > - It won't solve the problem.
> >
> > - It looks amateurish
>
> Yup. -0 here as well.
>
> As simple as our script is, lots of spiders now do the converse:
> s/_at_/@/g. =) The only thing would be to remove email addresses.
>
> I think that's a good thing to have though - if we don't regularly
> accept contributions from that person, we should have a contact
> email address for them. -- justin
"Me too!"
-0 here. If we remove it from CHANGES, then they just crawl the dev mailing
list archive. There isn't any reasonable way to avoid it, so let's not
obfuscate our materials.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Re: Email addresses in changes file
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:36:31AM -0800, Joshua Slive wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 dirkx@covalent.net wrote:
> > Anyone think it is a good idea if I did a
> >
> > s/@/_at_/g
> >
> > on the email addresses in the Changes file ?
>
> -0
>
> - It won't solve the problem.
>
> - It looks amateurish
Yup. -0 here as well.
As simple as our script is, lots of spiders now do the converse:
s/_at_/@/g. =) The only thing would be to remove email addresses.
I think that's a good thing to have though - if we don't regularly
accept contributions from that person, we should have a contact
email address for them. -- justin
Re: Email addresses in changes file
Posted by Tony Finch <do...@dotat.at>.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:36:31AM -0800, Joshua Slive wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 dirkx@covalent.net wrote:
> > Anyone think it is a good idea if I did a
> >
> > s/@/_at_/g
> >
> > on the email addresses in the Changes file ?
>
> -0
>
> - It won't solve the problem.
>
> - It looks amateurish
- The change is too late for most contributors.
- The email addresses are in the mailing list archives and the bug database.
Tony.
Re: Email addresses in changes file
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 dirkx@covalent.net wrote:
> Anyone think it is a good idea if I did a
>
> s/@/_at_/g
>
> on the email addresses in the Changes file ?
-0
- It won't solve the problem.
- It looks amateurish
We participate in a public development process. There is no way to hide
our email addresses, and we shouldn't try.
Joshua.
Re: Email addresses in changes file
Posted by Lars Eilebrecht <la...@hyperreal.org>.
According to dirkx@covalent.net:
> Anyone think it is a good idea if I did a
>
> s/@/_at_/g
>
> on the email addresses in the Changes file ?
Won't help that much ... -0.
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - All the simple programs have been
lars@hyperreal.org - written, and all the good names taken.