You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by asookazian <as...@gmail.com> on 2014/07/25 23:33:21 UTC
evaluating clustering options for AMQ 5.9.1
Hi I am doing some R&D regarding clustering for AMQ 5.9.1. We are looking to
evaluate active/active options as well as active/passive options.
Master/slave pattern seems to be popular for failover.
I've looked at the following blogs:
http://bsnyderblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-to-use-automatic-failover-in.html
<http://bsnyderblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-to-use-automatic-failover-in.html>
http://sensatic.net/activemq/new-activemq-failover-and-clustering-goodies.html
<http://sensatic.net/activemq/new-activemq-failover-and-clustering-goodies.html>
http://tmielke.blogspot.com/2011/09/activemq-network-bridge-to-masterslave.html
<http://tmielke.blogspot.com/2011/09/activemq-network-bridge-to-masterslave.html>
Please advise what would be the best choice for us considering active/active
scenario. Network of brokers? If so, what is the best example/tutorial
that I can deploy to a dev lab with VMs? thx.
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/evaluating-clustering-options-for-AMQ-5-9-1-tp4683683.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: evaluating clustering options for AMQ 5.9.1
Posted by asookazian <as...@gmail.com>.
How would I go about setting up a Shared File System Master Slave POC? Is
there any tutorial on this?
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/evaluating-clustering-options-for-AMQ-5-9-1-tp4683683p4683684.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: evaluating clustering options for AMQ 5.9.1
Posted by Kevin Burton <bu...@spinn3r.com>.
I'd recommend using the replicated leveldb + zookeeper setup.
Definitely the "correct" way to do things… We have limited experience with
it in production though.
Kevin
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 9:48 AM, asookazian <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Which book(s) specifically covers clustering? there were only 2 books
> listed
> on that link and i don't believe they cover clustering....
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/evaluating-clustering-options-for-AMQ-5-9-1-tp4683683p4683702.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
Location: *San Francisco, CA*
blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
… or check out my Google+ profile
<https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
<http://spinn3r.com>
Re: evaluating clustering options for AMQ 5.9.1
Posted by asookazian <as...@gmail.com>.
Which book(s) specifically covers clustering? there were only 2 books listed
on that link and i don't believe they cover clustering....
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/evaluating-clustering-options-for-AMQ-5-9-1-tp4683683p4683702.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: evaluating clustering options for AMQ 5.9.1
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi
There is also the ActiveMQ books that covers clustering
http://activemq.apache.org/books
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:33 PM, asookazian <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi I am doing some R&D regarding clustering for AMQ 5.9.1. We are looking to
> evaluate active/active options as well as active/passive options.
> Master/slave pattern seems to be popular for failover.
>
> I've looked at the following blogs:
>
> http://bsnyderblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-to-use-automatic-failover-in.html
> <http://bsnyderblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-to-use-automatic-failover-in.html>
>
> http://sensatic.net/activemq/new-activemq-failover-and-clustering-goodies.html
> <http://sensatic.net/activemq/new-activemq-failover-and-clustering-goodies.html>
>
> http://tmielke.blogspot.com/2011/09/activemq-network-bridge-to-masterslave.html
> <http://tmielke.blogspot.com/2011/09/activemq-network-bridge-to-masterslave.html>
>
> Please advise what would be the best choice for us considering active/active
> scenario. Network of brokers? If so, what is the best example/tutorial
> that I can deploy to a dev lab with VMs? thx.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/evaluating-clustering-options-for-AMQ-5-9-1-tp4683683.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
hawtio: http://hawt.io/
fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
Re: evaluating clustering options for AMQ 5.9.1
Posted by Matthew Pavlovich <ma...@gmail.com>.
Something to keep in mind— different clustering options provide different capabilities. Network of Brokers provides scaling, reduced latency for the “next” message to be processed (fault tolerance), while Master-Slave / LevelDB replication provide high availability of messages that have yet to be consumed.
The right clustering / HA strategy can change the expected behavior of the overall system— specifically, are you expecting to maintain message ordering?
Testing master-slave HA is straight forward with KahaDB.. just point two instances to the same KahaDB data directory and you’ll see the second instance logging that it can’t obtain the lock. Drop the first instance, and in a few seconds the slave will take over the data store.
LevelDB w/ replication generally starts with three nodes to get up and running.
On Jul 25, 2014, at 4:33 PM, asookazian <as...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi I am doing some R&D regarding clustering for AMQ 5.9.1. We are looking to
> evaluate active/active options as well as active/passive options.
> Master/slave pattern seems to be popular for failover.
>
> I've looked at the following blogs:
>
> http://bsnyderblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-to-use-automatic-failover-in.html
> <http://bsnyderblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-to-use-automatic-failover-in.html>
>
> http://sensatic.net/activemq/new-activemq-failover-and-clustering-goodies.html
> <http://sensatic.net/activemq/new-activemq-failover-and-clustering-goodies.html>
>
> http://tmielke.blogspot.com/2011/09/activemq-network-bridge-to-masterslave.html
> <http://tmielke.blogspot.com/2011/09/activemq-network-bridge-to-masterslave.html>
>
> Please advise what would be the best choice for us considering active/active
> scenario. Network of brokers? If so, what is the best example/tutorial
> that I can deploy to a dev lab with VMs? thx.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/evaluating-clustering-options-for-AMQ-5-9-1-tp4683683.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.