You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "Lionel VICTOR (free)" <li...@free.fr> on 2009/08/02 15:31:20 UTC

Re: BugFix for Bug 29744 against trunk... (now with the attachement... I hope)

Bloody web mail session... dropped my attachement... here you are... sorry about that...

----- Mail Original -----
De: "Lionel VICTOR (free)" <li...@free.fr>
À: dev@httpd.apache.org
Envoyé: Dimanche 2 Août 2009 15h28:52 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: BugFix for Bug 29744 against trunk...

Dear developpers, 

Please find attached a svn diff made against revision 800059 of http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk

This diff fixes the Bug 29744 on the Bugzilla (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29744)

The fix attempts to solve a problem with mod_proxy_connect not using the layered output model as it should, thus breaking the connection when used over SSL for instance...
Additionnally, other users commented on the bugzilla 'forum' that the patch also fixes (please see bugzilla Comment #84 From  evanc at nortel dot com):
- reporting issues when mod_proxy_connect was used with mod_logio
- other reporting problems mod_proxy_connect was used with mod_log_config

AFAIK no body reported failures after applying this patch.

I am pushing this patch here in the hope that someone from the official dev team can push it on next releases of apache httpd.

The bugzilla page for this bug is turning to a forum where people mostly complain about the patch not being integrated...
Though I'm not the patch maker, I hope that my attempt will help either closing the bug or returning a clear status on bugzilla that explains why the patch isn't accepted in the main stream.

Hope it helps

cheers and thanx for your time !

Re: BugFix for Bug 29744 against trunk... (now with the attachement... I hope)

Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
Lionel VICTOR (free) wrote:

> Bloody web mail session... dropped my attachement... here you are... sorry about that...

The patch needed some tweaks to make it compile cleanly, can you verify
that it works for you as expected?

Regards,
Graham
--