You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by ru...@us.ibm.com on 1999/12/13 15:47:28 UTC
Re: New accidental Java 2 dependency in ant?
There have been a number of Java 2 dependencies introduced into ant over
the last few weeks. Now that I have commit access, my plan is to remove
all of them by tomorrow. I plan to test on the IBM JDK 1.1.8 and on the
infamous Sun/Inprise j2sdk122 JDK on RedHat Linux 6.1 as well as with the
Sun 1.1.8 and Sun 1.2.2 JDKs on Windows NT. After I am done, if people
experience any problems with any other combination, I will gladly take a
look into it.
I'm not a big fan of checking in binaries, and will take a look at building
a bootstrap.sh based on the existing bootstrap.bat file.
This being said, I don't plan to remove ant.jar, I merely plan on replacing
it with a version which it capable of not only building itself but also
tomcat on the four platform/jdk combinations listed above. My request to
all the other committers is that this jar file not be replaced again until
something approximating this level of testing is performed.
Re: New accidental Java 2 dependency in ant?
Posted by Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org>.
rubys@us.ibm.com wrote:
>
> There have been a number of Java 2 dependencies introduced into ant over
> the last few weeks. Now that I have commit access, my plan is to remove
> all of them by tomorrow. I plan to test on the IBM JDK 1.1.8 and on the
> infamous Sun/Inprise j2sdk122 JDK on RedHat Linux 6.1 as well as with the
> Sun 1.1.8 and Sun 1.2.2 JDKs on Windows NT. After I am done, if people
> experience any problems with any other combination, I will gladly take a
> look into it.
Great. Thanks.
> I'm not a big fan of checking in binaries, and will take a look at building
> a bootstrap.sh based on the existing bootstrap.bat file.
>
> This being said, I don't plan to remove ant.jar, I merely plan on replacing
> it with a version which it capable of not only building itself but also
> tomcat on the four platform/jdk combinations listed above. My request to
> all the other committers is that this jar file not be replacedX-Mozilla-Status: 0009ing approximating this level of testing is performed.
+1, I agree.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<st...@apache.org> Friedrich Nietzsche
Re: New accidental Java 2 dependency in ant?
Posted by co...@eng.sun.com.
> I'm not a big fan of checking in binaries, and will take a look at building
> a bootstrap.sh based on the existing bootstrap.bat file.
I checked in a version yesterday :-)
As you may noticed, the nightly builds are not working since we moved
to locus, I am working on setting them up again.
I will (re)start sending the nightly mails to the list with the build results.
Costin
Re: New accidental Java 2 dependency in ant?
Posted by Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org>.
rubys@us.ibm.com wrote:
>
> There have been a number of Java 2 dependencies introduced into ant over
> the last few weeks. Now that I have commit access, my plan is to remove
> all of them by tomorrow. I plan to test on the IBM JDK 1.1.8 and on the
> infamous Sun/Inprise j2sdk122 JDK on RedHat Linux 6.1 as well as with the
> Sun 1.1.8 and Sun 1.2.2 JDKs on Windows NT. After I am done, if people
> experience any problems with any other combination, I will gladly take a
> look into it.
Great. Thanks.
> I'm not a big fan of checking in binaries, and will take a look at building
> a bootstrap.sh based on the existing bootstrap.bat file.
>
> This being said, I don't plan to remove ant.jar, I merely plan on replacing
> it with a version which it capable of not only building itself but also
> tomcat on the four platform/jdk combinations listed above. My request to
> all the other committers is that this jar file not be replaced again until
> something approximating this level of testing is performed.
+1, I agree.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<st...@apache.org> Friedrich Nietzsche
Re: New accidental Java 2 dependency in ant?
Posted by Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org>.
rubys@us.ibm.com wrote:
>
> There have been a number of Java 2 dependencies introduced into ant over
> the last few weeks. Now that I have commit access, my plan is to remove
> all of them by tomorrow. I plan to test on the IBM JDK 1.1.8 and on the
> infamous Sun/Inprise j2sdk122 JDK on RedHat Linux 6.1 as well as with the
> Sun 1.1.8 and Sun 1.2.2 JDKs on Windows NT. After I am done, if people
> experience any problems with any other combination, I will gladly take a
> look into it.
Great. Thanks.
> I'm not a big fan of checking in binaries, and will take a look at building
> a bootstrap.sh based on the existing bootstrap.bat file.
>
> This being said, I don't plan to remove ant.jar, I merely plan on replacing
> it with a version which it capable of not only building itself but also
> tomcat on the four platform/jdk combinations listed above. My request to
> all the other committers is that this jar file not be replacedX-MozillaX-Mozilla-Status: 0009ximating this level of testing is performed.
+1, I agree.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<st...@apache.org> Friedrich Nietzsche