Retiring Lokahi

[Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

The Incubator PMC is considering retiring the Lokahi project due to
lack of activity. The related thread from February didn't lead to much
action, so I assume there isn't much energy or interest in pursuing
other options. But perhaps I'm wrong?

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Re: Retiring Lokahi

[Ludovic Maitre <lu...@free.fr>]

Hi,

I would be happy to see the source of this and to help (a little bit) if 
needed,
Best regards,

Lega, Peter Z a écrit :
> There was some talk of bundling Lokahi into one of the Tomcat related
> projects as a management tool, which is what we use here to manage
> thousands of tomcat instances. Maybe making it one way of command and
> control of a current server bundled in will help generate awareness.
> It's mostly ready to use, our need is collaborators to move it forward,
> its already coded for its first revision.
>
> Just an idea,
> Pete
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 7:54 AM
> To: lokahi-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Retiring Lokahi
>
> Hi,
>
> The Incubator PMC is considering retiring the Lokahi project due to
> lack of activity. The related thread from February didn't lead to much
> action, so I assume there isn't much energy or interest in pursuing
> other options. But perhaps I'm wrong?
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
> Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
> information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station,
> New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known
> outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or
> MSD and in Japan, as Banyu - direct contact information for affiliates is
> available at http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be
> confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this
> message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this
> message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and
> then delete it from your system.
>
>
>
>   

Re: Retiring Lokahi

[Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <de...@hanik.com>]

Peter, the recommendations for retiring it is "due to lack of activity".
Pushing it into Tomcat wont get more activity. It would still have to 
graduate into Tomcat with some healthy community behind it

Filip


On 08/12/2009 07:04 AM, Lega, Peter Z wrote:
> There was some talk of bundling Lokahi into one of the Tomcat related
> projects as a management tool, which is what we use here to manage
> thousands of tomcat instances. Maybe making it one way of command and
> control of a current server bundled in will help generate awareness.
> It's mostly ready to use, our need is collaborators to move it forward,
> its already coded for its first revision.
>
> Just an idea,
> Pete
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 7:54 AM
> To: lokahi-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Retiring Lokahi
>
> Hi,
>
> The Incubator PMC is considering retiring the Lokahi project due to
> lack of activity. The related thread from February didn't lead to much
> action, so I assume there isn't much energy or interest in pursuing
> other options. But perhaps I'm wrong?
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
> Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
> information of Merck&  Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station,
> New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known
> outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp&  Dohme or
> MSD and in Japan, as Banyu - direct contact information for affiliates is
> available at http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be
> confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this
> message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this
> message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and
> then delete it from your system.
>
>
>    

Re: Retiring Lokahi

[Yoav Shapira <yo...@apache.org>]

I agree with retiring Lokahi.  Given that it had not enough interest
on its own, I don't want to push it into Tomcat either.  (Speaking as
a Tomcat PMC member.)

Thanks,

Yoav




On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Lega, Peter Z<pe...@merck.com> wrote:
> There was some talk of bundling Lokahi into one of the Tomcat related
> projects as a management tool, which is what we use here to manage
> thousands of tomcat instances. Maybe making it one way of command and
> control of a current server bundled in will help generate awareness.
> It's mostly ready to use, our need is collaborators to move it forward,
> its already coded for its first revision.
>
> Just an idea,
> Pete
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 7:54 AM
> To: lokahi-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Retiring Lokahi
>
> Hi,
>
> The Incubator PMC is considering retiring the Lokahi project due to
> lack of activity. The related thread from February didn't lead to much
> action, so I assume there isn't much energy or interest in pursuing
> other options. But perhaps I'm wrong?
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
> Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
> information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station,
> New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known
> outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or
> MSD and in Japan, as Banyu - direct contact information for affiliates is
> available at http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be
> confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this
> message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this
> message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and
> then delete it from your system.
>
>

RE: Retiring Lokahi

["Lega, Peter Z" <pe...@merck.com>]

There was some talk of bundling Lokahi into one of the Tomcat related
projects as a management tool, which is what we use here to manage
thousands of tomcat instances. Maybe making it one way of command and
control of a current server bundled in will help generate awareness.
It's mostly ready to use, our need is collaborators to move it forward,
its already coded for its first revision.

Just an idea,
Pete

-----Original Message-----
From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 7:54 AM
To: lokahi-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Retiring Lokahi

Hi,

The Incubator PMC is considering retiring the Lokahi project due to
lack of activity. The related thread from February didn't lead to much
action, so I assume there isn't much energy or interest in pursuing
other options. But perhaps I'm wrong?

BR,

Jukka Zitting
Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station,
New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known
outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or
MSD and in Japan, as Banyu - direct contact information for affiliates is
available at http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be
confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this
message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and
then delete it from your system.

Re: Retiring Lokahi

[Neil <st...@gmail.com>]

I don't think you are wrong.... The discussion thread was not fruitful.   I
agree with the PMC on retiring the project.

cheers,
-neil

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The Incubator PMC is considering retiring the Lokahi project due to
> lack of activity. The related thread from February didn't lead to much
> action, so I assume there isn't much energy or interest in pursuing
> other options. But perhaps I'm wrong?
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>