You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@arrow.apache.org by "Kun Liu (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/08/24 09:52:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (ARROW-13449) [Format][FlightRPC] Clarify that schemas are IPC-encapsulated
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-13449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17584153#comment-17584153 ]
Kun Liu commented on ARROW-13449:
---------------------------------
hi [~lidavidm] , it's flexible but not very clear using the bytes to represent the schema.
For example, some user meet the issue, the arrow-rs implementation the `SchameResult` with raw flatbuffer.
Details in the issue:
[https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/2445]
[https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/13853]
By the way, the version of `flight.proto` in arrow-rs is out of date, I will file a pr to update the `flight.proto` in the rust version.
> [Format][FlightRPC] Clarify that schemas are IPC-encapsulated
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARROW-13449
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-13449
> Project: Apache Arrow
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: FlightRPC, Format
> Reporter: David Li
> Assignee: Nate Bauernfeind
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 7.0.0
>
> Time Spent: 1h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> FlightRPC.proto is ambiguous about whether schemas are meant to be the raw Flatbuffer or IPC-encapsulated, but all implementations choose the latter and it was intended to be encapsulated. We should update the comments.
> See ML discussion: [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd3538bb70753661b33fb37ebde895bbf6859d044e5cc4c4f4353534c%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)