You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Elliot Miller (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/07/10 16:17:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-24672) HBase Shell Commands Survey
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17155586#comment-17155586 ]
Elliot Miller edited comment on HBASE-24672 at 7/10/20, 4:16 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I added one more column (to the spreadsheet) for unit testing. This column indicates which shell commands are directly tested (ie. not indirectly covered). My initial results indicate that 47 / 162 shell commands are currently missing unit tests.
was (Author: bitoffdev):
I added one more column for unit testing. This column indicates which shell commands are directly tested (ie. not indirectly covered). My initial results indicate that 47 / 162 shell commands are currently missing unit tests.
> HBase Shell Commands Survey
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-24672
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24672
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.3.0
> Reporter: Elliot Miller
> Assignee: Elliot Miller
> Priority: Minor
>
> I am going through all 163 commands in the hbase-shell module and checking a few things:
> * Functions as advertised
> * Consistent naming, formatting, and help
> * Return values
> ** The majority of the commands still return nil. We can make the shell more powerful by switching some of these commands to return Ruby objects.
> h3. Acceptance Criteria
> * The product of this ticket will be a *spreadsheet* with my comments on each command and potentially a design doc or other Jira tickets with the necessary changes found by the survey.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)