[JavaMail] J2EE Spec (Was RE: Geronimo standard Sun-API jars)

[Danny Angus <da...@apache.org>]

Henri wrote:

> I'm currently working on a belief that J2EE implies usage of standard Sun
> specs. ie) it says use JavaMail rather than have a mail option. Will read
> through the J2EE spec more to be able to put a better input in.

Yeah I fully expect you're right about that, I just was speculating about
what added value geronimo might offer, in any case actually implementing
javaMail is what is required, what would be much harder would be to re-write
javaMail simply inorder to have it available under ASFL.

d.

Re: [JavaMail] J2EE Spec (Was RE: Geronimo standard Sun-API jars)

[Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>]

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Danny Angus wrote:

> Henri wrote:
>
> > I'm currently working on a belief that J2EE implies usage of standard Sun
> > specs. ie) it says use JavaMail rather than have a mail option. Will read
> > through the J2EE spec more to be able to put a better input in.
>
> Yeah I fully expect you're right about that, I just was speculating about
> what added value geronimo might offer, in any case actually implementing
> javaMail is what is required, what would be much harder would be to re-write
> javaMail simply inorder to have it available under ASFL.

My focus is definitely on the J2EE parts of Geri [Spice Girls!] and how
many of them can be common [and maybe even in Jakarta Commons, but having
them common is the main aim]. Would love a ASF-J2EE impl's section :)

Hen