You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Wanqiang Ji (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/11/10 04:31:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-9005) FairScheduler maybe preempt the
AM container
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16682199#comment-16682199 ]
Wanqiang Ji edited comment on YARN-9005 at 11/10/18 4:30 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hi [~cheersyang], [~wilfreds] Happy Weekend! Can you help to review this?
This patch doesn't need new UTs.
I tested locally it can work correctly, but I don't know why UT failure. Anyone tracking it?
was (Author: jiwq):
Hi [~cheersyang], Happy Weekend! Can you help to review this?
This patch doesn't need new UTs.
I tested locally it can work correctly, but I don't know why UT failure. Anyone tracking it?
> FairScheduler maybe preempt the AM container
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-9005
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-9005
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Wanqiang Ji
> Assignee: Wanqiang Ji
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: YARN-9005.001.patch
>
>
> In the worst case, FS preempt the AM container. Due to FSPreemptionThread#identifyContainersToPreempt return value contains AM container.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org