You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@stanbol.apache.org by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> on 2013/02/09 20:51:27 UTC
Entityhub without default data?
Hello
The released version of Stanbol had this 43k default index for the
Entityhub. The current snapshot version seems not to have any entity.
Because of this the examples on the example page return no results (e.g.
the query for http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris). I like having some data
in Entityhub by default. If the data is removed then I think the example
should be changed as to include some example creating an entity so that the
user can click through it and have some actual results.
Cheers,
Reto
Re: Entityhub without default data?
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> do they support another method to access al entities?
no
> As for Sparql I do not really understand what they issue is, why does
> it makes a difference for LIMIT if there are some triple-pattern in
> the WHERE clause.
Because with a LIMIT of 10 you will get 7/7 Triples of the first
Entity and 3/15 Triples of the second Entity. Meaning that simple
Triple selection queries can not be used for paging - and when you
want to request all entities you will need to use paging.
So I suppose that one needs to use a special case for such kind of
queries such as
SELECT DISTINCT ?s WHERE ?s ?p ?o OFFSET x LIMIT y
and than load all outgoing triples for returned subjects. I would need
to have a look at the code and possible solutions
best
Rupert
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Update: I just found FieldQueryImpl so I don't need to create a new
>>> class or to use a Factory.
>>>
>>> However the following returns no results even though entities are available:
>>>
>>> final FieldQuery query = new FieldQueryImpl();
>>> final QueryResultList<Representation> result = siteManager.find(query);
>>> return "executing query result: "+result.results();
>>>
>>> Is it more complicated to make a query without any restriction?
>>
>> I have never tried to execute a query without constraint. This case is
>> also not considered by the implementations.
>>
>> A quick look at the SolrYard implementation suggests that this would
>> generate a SolrQuery with an empty query. An empty query results in an
>> empty query response by Solr. To iterate over all entities you would
>> need to use *:* as query. You can try this on the dev.Iks-project.eu
>> server by using
>>
>> http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/solr/default/iptc/select?q=
>>
>> and
>>
>> http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/solr/default/iptc/select?q=*:*
>>
>> This means adding this feature for the Solr based implementation would
>> be easy. For SPARQL I do not have a clear Idea how to formulate an
>> Query that iterate over all Entities - meaning selecting any subject
>> and providing all outgoing triples - mainly because the LIMIT in
>> SPARQL is based on Triples and not based on selected subjects.
>>
>> best
>> Rupert
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Reto
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com> wrote:
>>>> Thanks Rupert,
>>>>
>>>> Indeed the SiteManager is what I was looking for.
>>>>
>>>> Now i?m trying to find out how to query against the SiteManager. The
>>>> SiteManager has method that take a FieldQuery but it has no method
>>>> providing a QueryFactory. Can I just pass it an anonymous instance of
>>>> Query? What are the set- and remove methods for, is it safe not to
>>>> implement them?
>>>>
>>>> Will a query with an empty constraint set result in all entities being returned?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Reto
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>>>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you talking about the entityhub and not about the dbpedia
>>>>> referenced site? The Entityhub is empty by default.
>>>>>
>>>>> best
>>>>> Rupert
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Rupert
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm using the full launcher. On
>>>>>> http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/entityhub I don't see more data either.
>>>>>> It doesn't find dbpedia:Paris and the following query yields to no
>>>>>> result:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> "query": {
>>>>>> "selected": [],
>>>>>> "constraints": [{
>>>>>> "type": "text",
>>>>>> "patternType": "wildcard",
>>>>>> "text": "*",
>>>>>> "field":
>>>>>> "http:\/\/stanbol.apache.org\/ontology\/entityhub\/entityhub#label"
>>>>>> }],
>>>>>> "limit": 10,
>>>>>> "offset": 0,
>>>>>> "ldpath": "name = rdfs:label[@en] :: xsd:string;"
>>>>>> },
>>>>>> "results": []
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Reto
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>>>>>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Reto
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AFAIK the stable, full and full-war launcher should still have the
>>>>>>> dbpedia defaultdata index included. If this would not be the case for
>>>>>>> the full launcher, than the integration-test would fail. What launcher
>>>>>>> are you referring to?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> best
>>>>>>> Rupert
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The released version of Stanbol had this 43k default index for the
>>>>>>>> Entityhub. The current snapshot version seems not to have any entity.
>>>>>>>> Because of this the examples on the example page return no results (e.g.
>>>>>>>> the query for http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris). I like having some data
>>>>>>>> in Entityhub by default. If the data is removed then I think the example
>>>>>>>> should be changed as to include some example creating an entity so that the
>>>>>>>> user can click through it and have some actual results.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Reto
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Entityhub without default data?
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>.
Hi
Ok I've created STANBOL-929 to address this. If Sites and Entityhub
do not support unrestricted queries, do they support another method to
access al entities?
As for Sparql I do not really understand what they issue is, why does
it makes a difference for LIMIT if there are some triple-pattern in
the WHERE clause.
Cheers,
Reto
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
<ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Update: I just found FieldQueryImpl so I don't need to create a new
>> class or to use a Factory.
>>
>> However the following returns no results even though entities are available:
>>
>> final FieldQuery query = new FieldQueryImpl();
>> final QueryResultList<Representation> result = siteManager.find(query);
>> return "executing query result: "+result.results();
>>
>> Is it more complicated to make a query without any restriction?
>
> I have never tried to execute a query without constraint. This case is
> also not considered by the implementations.
>
> A quick look at the SolrYard implementation suggests that this would
> generate a SolrQuery with an empty query. An empty query results in an
> empty query response by Solr. To iterate over all entities you would
> need to use *:* as query. You can try this on the dev.Iks-project.eu
> server by using
>
> http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/solr/default/iptc/select?q=
>
> and
>
> http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/solr/default/iptc/select?q=*:*
>
> This means adding this feature for the Solr based implementation would
> be easy. For SPARQL I do not have a clear Idea how to formulate an
> Query that iterate over all Entities - meaning selecting any subject
> and providing all outgoing triples - mainly because the LIMIT in
> SPARQL is based on Triples and not based on selected subjects.
>
> best
> Rupert
>
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Rupert,
>>>
>>> Indeed the SiteManager is what I was looking for.
>>>
>>> Now i?m trying to find out how to query against the SiteManager. The
>>> SiteManager has method that take a FieldQuery but it has no method
>>> providing a QueryFactory. Can I just pass it an anonymous instance of
>>> Query? What are the set- and remove methods for, is it safe not to
>>> implement them?
>>>
>>> Will a query with an empty constraint set result in all entities being returned?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Reto
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Are you talking about the entityhub and not about the dbpedia
>>>> referenced site? The Entityhub is empty by default.
>>>>
>>>> best
>>>> Rupert
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Rupert
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm using the full launcher. On
>>>>> http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/entityhub I don't see more data either.
>>>>> It doesn't find dbpedia:Paris and the following query yields to no
>>>>> result:
>>>>>
>>>>> {
>>>>> "query": {
>>>>> "selected": [],
>>>>> "constraints": [{
>>>>> "type": "text",
>>>>> "patternType": "wildcard",
>>>>> "text": "*",
>>>>> "field":
>>>>> "http:\/\/stanbol.apache.org\/ontology\/entityhub\/entityhub#label"
>>>>> }],
>>>>> "limit": 10,
>>>>> "offset": 0,
>>>>> "ldpath": "name = rdfs:label[@en] :: xsd:string;"
>>>>> },
>>>>> "results": []
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Reto
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>>>>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Reto
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AFAIK the stable, full and full-war launcher should still have the
>>>>>> dbpedia defaultdata index included. If this would not be the case for
>>>>>> the full launcher, than the integration-test would fail. What launcher
>>>>>> are you referring to?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> best
>>>>>> Rupert
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The released version of Stanbol had this 43k default index for the
>>>>>>> Entityhub. The current snapshot version seems not to have any entity.
>>>>>>> Because of this the examples on the example page return no results (e.g.
>>>>>>> the query for http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris). I like having some data
>>>>>>> in Entityhub by default. If the data is removed then I think the example
>>>>>>> should be changed as to include some example creating an entity so that the
>>>>>>> user can click through it and have some actual results.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Reto
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Entityhub without default data?
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> Update: I just found FieldQueryImpl so I don't need to create a new
> class or to use a Factory.
>
> However the following returns no results even though entities are available:
>
> final FieldQuery query = new FieldQueryImpl();
> final QueryResultList<Representation> result = siteManager.find(query);
> return "executing query result: "+result.results();
>
> Is it more complicated to make a query without any restriction?
I have never tried to execute a query without constraint. This case is
also not considered by the implementations.
A quick look at the SolrYard implementation suggests that this would
generate a SolrQuery with an empty query. An empty query results in an
empty query response by Solr. To iterate over all entities you would
need to use *:* as query. You can try this on the dev.Iks-project.eu
server by using
http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/solr/default/iptc/select?q=
and
http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/solr/default/iptc/select?q=*:*
This means adding this feature for the Solr based implementation would
be easy. For SPARQL I do not have a clear Idea how to formulate an
Query that iterate over all Entities - meaning selecting any subject
and providing all outgoing triples - mainly because the LIMIT in
SPARQL is based on Triples and not based on selected subjects.
best
Rupert
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Rupert,
>>
>> Indeed the SiteManager is what I was looking for.
>>
>> Now i?m trying to find out how to query against the SiteManager. The
>> SiteManager has method that take a FieldQuery but it has no method
>> providing a QueryFactory. Can I just pass it an anonymous instance of
>> Query? What are the set- and remove methods for, is it safe not to
>> implement them?
>>
>> Will a query with an empty constraint set result in all entities being returned?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Are you talking about the entityhub and not about the dbpedia
>>> referenced site? The Entityhub is empty by default.
>>>
>>> best
>>> Rupert
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Rupert
>>>>
>>>> I'm using the full launcher. On
>>>> http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/entityhub I don't see more data either.
>>>> It doesn't find dbpedia:Paris and the following query yields to no
>>>> result:
>>>>
>>>> {
>>>> "query": {
>>>> "selected": [],
>>>> "constraints": [{
>>>> "type": "text",
>>>> "patternType": "wildcard",
>>>> "text": "*",
>>>> "field":
>>>> "http:\/\/stanbol.apache.org\/ontology\/entityhub\/entityhub#label"
>>>> }],
>>>> "limit": 10,
>>>> "offset": 0,
>>>> "ldpath": "name = rdfs:label[@en] :: xsd:string;"
>>>> },
>>>> "results": []
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Reto
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>>>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Reto
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK the stable, full and full-war launcher should still have the
>>>>> dbpedia defaultdata index included. If this would not be the case for
>>>>> the full launcher, than the integration-test would fail. What launcher
>>>>> are you referring to?
>>>>>
>>>>> best
>>>>> Rupert
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The released version of Stanbol had this 43k default index for the
>>>>>> Entityhub. The current snapshot version seems not to have any entity.
>>>>>> Because of this the examples on the example page return no results (e.g.
>>>>>> the query for http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris). I like having some data
>>>>>> in Entityhub by default. If the data is removed then I think the example
>>>>>> should be changed as to include some example creating an entity so that the
>>>>>> user can click through it and have some actual results.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Reto
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Entityhub without default data?
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>.
Update: I just found FieldQueryImpl so I don't need to create a new
class or to use a Factory.
However the following returns no results even though entities are available:
final FieldQuery query = new FieldQueryImpl();
final QueryResultList<Representation> result = siteManager.find(query);
return "executing query result: "+result.results();
Is it more complicated to make a query without any restriction?
Cheers,
Reto
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com> wrote:
> Thanks Rupert,
>
> Indeed the SiteManager is what I was looking for.
>
> Now i?m trying to find out how to query against the SiteManager. The
> SiteManager has method that take a FieldQuery but it has no method
> providing a QueryFactory. Can I just pass it an anonymous instance of
> Query? What are the set- and remove methods for, is it safe not to
> implement them?
>
> Will a query with an empty constraint set result in all entities being returned?
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Are you talking about the entityhub and not about the dbpedia
>> referenced site? The Entityhub is empty by default.
>>
>> best
>> Rupert
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Rupert
>>>
>>> I'm using the full launcher. On
>>> http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/entityhub I don't see more data either.
>>> It doesn't find dbpedia:Paris and the following query yields to no
>>> result:
>>>
>>> {
>>> "query": {
>>> "selected": [],
>>> "constraints": [{
>>> "type": "text",
>>> "patternType": "wildcard",
>>> "text": "*",
>>> "field":
>>> "http:\/\/stanbol.apache.org\/ontology\/entityhub\/entityhub#label"
>>> }],
>>> "limit": 10,
>>> "offset": 0,
>>> "ldpath": "name = rdfs:label[@en] :: xsd:string;"
>>> },
>>> "results": []
>>> }
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Reto
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Reto
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK the stable, full and full-war launcher should still have the
>>>> dbpedia defaultdata index included. If this would not be the case for
>>>> the full launcher, than the integration-test would fail. What launcher
>>>> are you referring to?
>>>>
>>>> best
>>>> Rupert
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hello
>>>>>
>>>>> The released version of Stanbol had this 43k default index for the
>>>>> Entityhub. The current snapshot version seems not to have any entity.
>>>>> Because of this the examples on the example page return no results (e.g.
>>>>> the query for http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris). I like having some data
>>>>> in Entityhub by default. If the data is removed then I think the example
>>>>> should be changed as to include some example creating an entity so that the
>>>>> user can click through it and have some actual results.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Reto
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Entityhub without default data?
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com>.
Thanks Rupert,
Indeed the SiteManager is what I was looking for.
Now i?m trying to find out how to query against the SiteManager. The
SiteManager has method that take a FieldQuery but it has no method
providing a QueryFactory. Can I just pass it an anonymous instance of
Query? What are the set- and remove methods for, is it safe not to
implement them?
Will a query with an empty constraint set result in all entities being returned?
Cheers,
Reto
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
<ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Are you talking about the entityhub and not about the dbpedia
> referenced site? The Entityhub is empty by default.
>
> best
> Rupert
>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com> wrote:
>> Hi Rupert
>>
>> I'm using the full launcher. On
>> http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/entityhub I don't see more data either.
>> It doesn't find dbpedia:Paris and the following query yields to no
>> result:
>>
>> {
>> "query": {
>> "selected": [],
>> "constraints": [{
>> "type": "text",
>> "patternType": "wildcard",
>> "text": "*",
>> "field":
>> "http:\/\/stanbol.apache.org\/ontology\/entityhub\/entityhub#label"
>> }],
>> "limit": 10,
>> "offset": 0,
>> "ldpath": "name = rdfs:label[@en] :: xsd:string;"
>> },
>> "results": []
>> }
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
>> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Reto
>>>
>>> AFAIK the stable, full and full-war launcher should still have the
>>> dbpedia defaultdata index included. If this would not be the case for
>>> the full launcher, than the integration-test would fail. What launcher
>>> are you referring to?
>>>
>>> best
>>> Rupert
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> The released version of Stanbol had this 43k default index for the
>>>> Entityhub. The current snapshot version seems not to have any entity.
>>>> Because of this the examples on the example page return no results (e.g.
>>>> the query for http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris). I like having some data
>>>> in Entityhub by default. If the data is removed then I think the example
>>>> should be changed as to include some example creating an entity so that the
>>>> user can click through it and have some actual results.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Reto
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Entityhub without default data?
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Are you talking about the entityhub and not about the dbpedia
referenced site? The Entityhub is empty by default.
best
Rupert
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com> wrote:
> Hi Rupert
>
> I'm using the full launcher. On
> http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/entityhub I don't see more data either.
> It doesn't find dbpedia:Paris and the following query yields to no
> result:
>
> {
> "query": {
> "selected": [],
> "constraints": [{
> "type": "text",
> "patternType": "wildcard",
> "text": "*",
> "field":
> "http:\/\/stanbol.apache.org\/ontology\/entityhub\/entityhub#label"
> }],
> "limit": 10,
> "offset": 0,
> "ldpath": "name = rdfs:label[@en] :: xsd:string;"
> },
> "results": []
> }
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
> <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Reto
>>
>> AFAIK the stable, full and full-war launcher should still have the
>> dbpedia defaultdata index included. If this would not be the case for
>> the full launcher, than the integration-test would fail. What launcher
>> are you referring to?
>>
>> best
>> Rupert
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> The released version of Stanbol had this 43k default index for the
>>> Entityhub. The current snapshot version seems not to have any entity.
>>> Because of this the examples on the example page return no results (e.g.
>>> the query for http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris). I like having some data
>>> in Entityhub by default. If the data is removed then I think the example
>>> should be changed as to include some example creating an entity so that the
>>> user can click through it and have some actual results.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Reto
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
>> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
>> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Entityhub without default data?
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@wymiwyg.com>.
Hi Rupert
I'm using the full launcher. On
http://dev.iks-project.eu:8081/entityhub I don't see more data either.
It doesn't find dbpedia:Paris and the following query yields to no
result:
{
"query": {
"selected": [],
"constraints": [{
"type": "text",
"patternType": "wildcard",
"text": "*",
"field":
"http:\/\/stanbol.apache.org\/ontology\/entityhub\/entityhub#label"
}],
"limit": 10,
"offset": 0,
"ldpath": "name = rdfs:label[@en] :: xsd:string;"
},
"results": []
}
Cheers,
Reto
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Rupert Westenthaler
<ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Reto
>
> AFAIK the stable, full and full-war launcher should still have the
> dbpedia defaultdata index included. If this would not be the case for
> the full launcher, than the integration-test would fail. What launcher
> are you referring to?
>
> best
> Rupert
>
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> The released version of Stanbol had this 43k default index for the
>> Entityhub. The current snapshot version seems not to have any entity.
>> Because of this the examples on the example page return no results (e.g.
>> the query for http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris). I like having some data
>> in Entityhub by default. If the data is removed then I think the example
>> should be changed as to include some example creating an entity so that the
>> user can click through it and have some actual results.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Entityhub without default data?
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi Reto
AFAIK the stable, full and full-war launcher should still have the
dbpedia defaultdata index included. If this would not be the case for
the full launcher, than the integration-test would fail. What launcher
are you referring to?
best
Rupert
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello
>
> The released version of Stanbol had this 43k default index for the
> Entityhub. The current snapshot version seems not to have any entity.
> Because of this the examples on the example page return no results (e.g.
> the query for http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris). I like having some data
> in Entityhub by default. If the data is removed then I think the example
> should be changed as to include some example creating an entity so that the
> user can click through it and have some actual results.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen