"jdbc" taglib

[md...@us.britannica.com]

Hi all,

I'm getting pretty close to a reasonable implementation of JDBC tags, but
I've had some second thoughts about how to release them.  

Rather than replacing the current "sql" taglib, why don't we create a new
"jdbc" taglib.  "jdbc" is a better name anyway, since this taglib
encapsulates the primary jdbc objects.  I could import my code into the
"jdbc" project and give everybody some time to review it and make
suggestions before we vote to release it.  Does that sound good?

- Morgan

Re: "jdbc" taglib

["Craig R. McClanahan" <Cr...@eng.sun.com>]

mdelagra@us.britannica.com wrote:

>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm getting pretty close to a reasonable implementation of JDBC tags, but I've
> had some second thoughts about how to release them.
>
> Rather than replacing the current "sql" taglib, why don't we create a new
> "jdbc" taglib.  "jdbc" is a better name anyway, since this taglib encapsulates
> the primary jdbc objects.  I could import my code into the "jdbc" project and
> give everybody some time to review it and make suggestions before we vote to
> release it.  Does that sound good?
>
> - Morgan

+1

Craig McClanahan

Re: "jdbc" taglib

["Craig R. McClanahan" <Cr...@eng.sun.com>]

Marius Scurtescu wrote:

> I am about to implement a tag to handle result sets, but probably
> you already have that in the jdbc lib. I am more than eager to
> use and test such a library.
>
> If the jdbc lib is properly implemented I can't see what else
> would be needed in the sql lib?
>

There might at some future time be a "higher level" tag library that doesn't really focus on the nuts and bolts of JDBC components.
That would be a good time to reuse the SQL library name.

>
> Marius
>

Craig

Re: "jdbc" taglib

[Marius Scurtescu <ma...@multiactive.com>]

I am about to implement a tag to handle result sets, but probably
you already have that in the jdbc lib. I am more than eager to
use and test such a library.

If the jdbc lib is properly implemented I can't see what else 
would be needed in the sql lib?

Marius


> mdelagra@us.britannica.com wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm getting pretty close to a reasonable implementation of JDBC tags, but I've had some second thoughts about how to release
> them.
> 
> Rather than replacing the current "sql" taglib, why don't we create a new "jdbc" taglib.  "jdbc" is a better name anyway, since
> this taglib encapsulates the primary jdbc objects.  I could import my code into the "jdbc" project and give everybody some time to
> review it and make suggestions before we vote to release it.  Does that sound good?
> 
> - Morgan

-- 
------------------
Marius Scurtescu, Software Engineer
Tel: (604) 899-2835 Fax: (604) 899-2899
mailto:marius@multiactive.com
Multiactive Software Inc. http://www.multiactive.com
------------------
Attract and retain customers with Multiactive Software --
proud winners of PC WEEK's "Best of COMDEX" award.
------------------