You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@openmeetings.apache.org by Bart Coninckx <ba...@telenet.be> on 2013/02/01 23:48:21 UTC
the future of OM
Hi guys,
I was watching a presentation on WebRTC on Astricon and I was wondering
what the outlook on this new technology means for OM. If the technology
to transmit and receive video and speach is embedded in the browser the
need for red5 and Flash will obviously disappear. So what does the
future mean for OM?
cheers,
BC
RE: the future of OM
Posted by Stephen Cottham <St...@robertbird.com.au>.
Mayank,
I think it's already in the build so you would need to go here:
http://(yourOMServerIP):5080/openmeetings/html
Best Regards
From: Mayank Jain [mailto:contactmayankjain@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 February 2013 09:40
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
Subject: Re: the future of OM
The link you provided is link to your localhost. Can you please
provide the correct link?
Regards,
Mayank Jain
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:27 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com
<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
Maxim and I also have been working on the HTML5 version of the admin
interface.
Just goto: http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/html
and you will see.
Only the admin interface is working, so theoretically you can do all the
non conferencing stuff without Flash, but as soon as its getting
interesting we rely on Flash for now.
There might be some glitches also in the admin interface cause we might
add some new attributes for example in the Room Entity. But you get at
least an idea of it.
The HTML5 interface is using Apache Wicket + jQuery.
Sebastian
2013/2/3 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
So we are stuck on flash right now :(
On Feb 2, 2013 4:39 PM, "Bart Coninckx" <ba...@telenet.be>
wrote:
Correct, Chrome only. Friefox if you take the SVN version.
BC
On 02/02/13 08:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
I believe we will use it as soon as it will be supported by most
popular browsers. (If I'm not mistaken it is supported by Chrome only
right now)
On Feb 2, 2013 5:48 AM, "Bart Coninckx"
<ba...@telenet.be> wrote:
Hi guys,
I was watching a presentation on WebRTC on Astricon and I was
wondering what the outlook on this new technology means for OM. If the
technology to transmit and receive video and speach is embedded in the
browser the need for red5 and Flash will obviously disappear. So what
does the future mean for OM?
cheers,
BC
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock <https://twitter.com/#%21/dead_lock>
http://www.webbase-design.de <http://www.webbase-design.de>
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com <http://www.wagner-sebastian.com>
seba.wagner@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
Stephen Cottham
Group IT Manager (Associate)
Robert Bird Group
Level 5, 333 Ann St
Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia
Phone: +6173 319 2777 (AUS)
Phone: +44207 633 2880 (UK)
Fax: +6173 319 2799
Mobile: +61400 756 963 (AUS)
Mobile: +447900 918 616 (UK)
Web: www.robertbird.com
This email and any attachments are confidential and may contain legally privileged information or copyright material. Unless expressly stated, confidentiality and/or legal privilege is not intended to be waived by the sending of this email. The contents of this email, including any attachments, are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact us immediately by return email and then delete both messages. You may not otherwise read, forward, copy, use or disclose this email or any attachments. Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states otherwise. It is your responsibility to check any attachments for viruses or defects before opening or sending them on. None of the sender or its related entities accepts any liability for any consequential damage resulting from this email containing computer viruses.
Disclaimer added by CodeTwo Exchange Rules
http://www.codetwo.com
Re: the future of OM
Posted by Mayank Jain <co...@gmail.com>.
The link you provided is link to your localhost. Can you please provide
the correct link?
Regards,
Mayank Jain
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:27 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <seba.wagner@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Maxim and I also have been working on the HTML5 version of the admin
> interface.
> Just goto: http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/html
> and you will see.
>
> Only the admin interface is working, so theoretically you can do all the
> non conferencing stuff without Flash, but as soon as its getting
> interesting we rely on Flash for now.
> There might be some glitches also in the admin interface cause we might
> add some new attributes for example in the Room Entity. But you get at
> least an idea of it.
>
> The HTML5 interface is using Apache Wicket + jQuery.
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> 2013/2/3 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>
>> So we are stuck on flash right now :(
>> On Feb 2, 2013 4:39 PM, "Bart Coninckx" <ba...@telenet.be> wrote:
>>
>>> Correct, Chrome only. Friefox if you take the SVN version.
>>>
>>> BC
>>>
>>> On 02/02/13 08:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe we will use it as soon as it will be supported by most popular
>>> browsers. (If I'm not mistaken it is supported by Chrome only right now)
>>> On Feb 2, 2013 5:48 AM, "Bart Coninckx" <ba...@telenet.be>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> I was watching a presentation on WebRTC on Astricon and I was wondering
>>>> what the outlook on this new technology means for OM. If the technology to
>>>> transmit and receive video and speach is embedded in the browser the need
>>>> for red5 and Flash will obviously disappear. So what does the future mean
>>>> for OM?
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>>
>>>> BC
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
Re: the future of OM
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Maxim and I also have been working on the HTML5 version of the admin
interface.
Just goto: http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/html
and you will see.
Only the admin interface is working, so theoretically you can do all the
non conferencing stuff without Flash, but as soon as its getting
interesting we rely on Flash for now.
There might be some glitches also in the admin interface cause we might add
some new attributes for example in the Room Entity. But you get at least an
idea of it.
The HTML5 interface is using Apache Wicket + jQuery.
Sebastian
2013/2/3 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> So we are stuck on flash right now :(
> On Feb 2, 2013 4:39 PM, "Bart Coninckx" <ba...@telenet.be> wrote:
>
>> Correct, Chrome only. Friefox if you take the SVN version.
>>
>> BC
>>
>> On 02/02/13 08:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>
>> I believe we will use it as soon as it will be supported by most popular
>> browsers. (If I'm not mistaken it is supported by Chrome only right now)
>> On Feb 2, 2013 5:48 AM, "Bart Coninckx" <ba...@telenet.be> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I was watching a presentation on WebRTC on Astricon and I was wondering
>>> what the outlook on this new technology means for OM. If the technology to
>>> transmit and receive video and speach is embedded in the browser the need
>>> for red5 and Flash will obviously disappear. So what does the future mean
>>> for OM?
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>>
>>> BC
>>>
>>
>>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: the future of OM
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
So we are stuck on flash right now :(
On Feb 2, 2013 4:39 PM, "Bart Coninckx" <ba...@telenet.be> wrote:
> Correct, Chrome only. Friefox if you take the SVN version.
>
> BC
>
> On 02/02/13 08:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
> I believe we will use it as soon as it will be supported by most popular
> browsers. (If I'm not mistaken it is supported by Chrome only right now)
> On Feb 2, 2013 5:48 AM, "Bart Coninckx" <ba...@telenet.be> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I was watching a presentation on WebRTC on Astricon and I was wondering
>> what the outlook on this new technology means for OM. If the technology to
>> transmit and receive video and speach is embedded in the browser the need
>> for red5 and Flash will obviously disappear. So what does the future mean
>> for OM?
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> BC
>>
>
>
Re: the future of OM
Posted by Bart Coninckx <ba...@telenet.be>.
Correct, Chrome only. Friefox if you take the SVN version.
BC
On 02/02/13 08:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
> I believe we will use it as soon as it will be supported by most
> popular browsers. (If I'm not mistaken it is supported by Chrome only
> right now)
>
> On Feb 2, 2013 5:48 AM, "Bart Coninckx" <bart.coninckx@telenet.be
> <ma...@telenet.be>> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I was watching a presentation on WebRTC on Astricon and I was
> wondering what the outlook on this new technology means for OM. If
> the technology to transmit and receive video and speach is
> embedded in the browser the need for red5 and Flash will obviously
> disappear. So what does the future mean for OM?
>
> cheers,
>
> BC
>
Re: the future of OM
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
I believe we will use it as soon as it will be supported by most popular
browsers. (If I'm not mistaken it is supported by Chrome only right now)
On Feb 2, 2013 5:48 AM, "Bart Coninckx" <ba...@telenet.be> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I was watching a presentation on WebRTC on Astricon and I was wondering
> what the outlook on this new technology means for OM. If the technology to
> transmit and receive video and speach is embedded in the browser the need
> for red5 and Flash will obviously disappear. So what does the future mean
> for OM?
>
> cheers,
>
> BC
>