[jira] [Assigned] (MAHOUT-1261) TasteHadoopUtils.idToIndex can return an int that has size Integer.MAX_VALUE

["Suneel Marthi (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Suneel Marthi reassigned MAHOUT-1261:
-------------------------------------

    Assignee: Sebastian Schelter

[~ssc] Could u look at this? Thanks.

> TasteHadoopUtils.idToIndex can return an int that has size Integer.MAX_VALUE
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAHOUT-1261
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1261
>             Project: Mahout
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Collaborative Filtering
>    Affects Versions: 0.8
>            Reporter: Dan Filimon
>            Assignee: Sebastian Schelter
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: MAHOUT-1261.patch
>
>
> I'm running ItemSimilarityJob on a very large (~600M by 4B) matrix that's very sparse (total set of associations is 630MB).
> The job fails because of an IndexException in ToUserVectorsReducer.
> TasteHadoopUtils.idToIndex(long id) hashes a long with:
> 0x7fffffff & Longs.hashCode(id) (line o.a.m.cf.taste.hadoop.TasteHadoopUtils:57).
> For some id (I don't know what value), the result returned is Integer.MAX_VALUE.
> This cannot be set in the userVector because the cardinality of that is also Integer.MAX_VALUE and it throws an exception.
> So, the issue is that values from 0 to INT_MAX are returned by idToIndex but the vector only has 0 to INT_MAX - 1 possible entries.
> It's a nasty little off-by-one bug.
> I'm thinking of just % size when setting.
> [~ssc] & everyone else, thoughts? :)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)