Re: [poll] Change logging to SLF4J?

[Chris Hostetter <ho...@fucit.org>]

(note: list change to solr-dev)

Giving the underwhelming response to this poll, it seems pretty clear to 
me that the number of people who care one way or another about how Solr 
does logging can probably be counted on one hand ... ok, maybe two hands.



-Hoss

Re: [poll] Change logging to SLF4J?

[Chris Hostetter <ho...@fucit.org>]

: So I'm not sure where that leaves us.  Unless Grant feels strongly, I think we
: should drop it till after 1.3 release.

+1

I think that would be wise even if there were more votes. I'd like to see 
SLF4J in JUL mode sitting on the trunk with people using the nightlies not 
noticing anything strange before we put a lot of faith in releasing with 
it.




-Hoss

Re: [poll] Change logging to SLF4J?

[Ryan McKinley <ry...@gmail.com>]

Hymm, I guess folks aren't coming out of the woodwork to vote for this  
one.

Wicket recently had a poll with ~100 votes cast:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--vote--Release-1.4-with-only-generics-and-stop-support-for-1.3-p16220947.html

So I'm not sure where that leaves us.  Unless Grant feels strongly, I  
think we should drop it till after 1.3 release.

ryan


On May 16, 2008, at 5:49 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> (note: list change to solr-dev)
>
> Giving the underwhelming response to this poll, it seems pretty  
> clear to
> me that the number of people who care one way or another about how  
> Solr
> does logging can probably be counted on one hand ... ok, maybe two  
> hands.
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>