You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@accumulo.apache.org by Christopher <ct...@apache.org> on 2014/03/04 01:27:28 UTC
Re: Git Push Summary
This does not look correct. The 1.5.1 tag should have been the GPG
signed one that Josh was going to create from the 1.5.1-rc3
(c485b41f7). This is a different SHA1 entirely.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:42 PM, <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> Repository: accumulo
> Updated Tags: refs/tags/1.5.1 [created] 6ce236826
Re: Git Push Summary
Posted by Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com>.
The hash points indirectly at the commit because it carries signature
information.
On Mar 4, 2014 12:00 AM, "Christopher" <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yeah, I guess I was just confused, because I expected the hash
> provided in the message to point to the HEAD commit in the tag, not
> something specific to the tag's own blob.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:04 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Deleting the rc tag?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Nevermind and disregard. I'm mistaken. We voted on 3478f71a as
> >> 1.5.1-rc3... this tag is correct.
> >>
> >> However, I am confused about the previous push delete:
> >> "Updated Tags: refs/tags/1.5.1-rc3 [deleted] c485b41f7"
> >>
> >> --
> >> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > This does not look correct. The 1.5.1 tag should have been the GPG
> >> > signed one that Josh was going to create from the 1.5.1-rc3
> >> > (c485b41f7). This is a different SHA1 entirely.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:42 PM, <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >> Repository: accumulo
> >> >> Updated Tags: refs/tags/1.5.1 [created] 6ce236826
> >>
>
Re: Git Push Summary
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Yeah, I guess I was just confused, because I expected the hash
provided in the message to point to the HEAD commit in the tag, not
something specific to the tag's own blob.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:04 PM, John Vines <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> Deleting the rc tag?
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Nevermind and disregard. I'm mistaken. We voted on 3478f71a as
>> 1.5.1-rc3... this tag is correct.
>>
>> However, I am confused about the previous push delete:
>> "Updated Tags: refs/tags/1.5.1-rc3 [deleted] c485b41f7"
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > This does not look correct. The 1.5.1 tag should have been the GPG
>> > signed one that Josh was going to create from the 1.5.1-rc3
>> > (c485b41f7). This is a different SHA1 entirely.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Christopher L Tubbs II
>> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:42 PM, <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> Repository: accumulo
>> >> Updated Tags: refs/tags/1.5.1 [created] 6ce236826
>>
Re: Git Push Summary
Posted by John Vines <vi...@apache.org>.
Deleting the rc tag?
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Nevermind and disregard. I'm mistaken. We voted on 3478f71a as
> 1.5.1-rc3... this tag is correct.
>
> However, I am confused about the previous push delete:
> "Updated Tags: refs/tags/1.5.1-rc3 [deleted] c485b41f7"
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> > This does not look correct. The 1.5.1 tag should have been the GPG
> > signed one that Josh was going to create from the 1.5.1-rc3
> > (c485b41f7). This is a different SHA1 entirely.
> >
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:42 PM, <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> Repository: accumulo
> >> Updated Tags: refs/tags/1.5.1 [created] 6ce236826
>
Re: Git Push Summary
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Nevermind and disregard. I'm mistaken. We voted on 3478f71a as
1.5.1-rc3... this tag is correct.
However, I am confused about the previous push delete:
"Updated Tags: refs/tags/1.5.1-rc3 [deleted] c485b41f7"
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> This does not look correct. The 1.5.1 tag should have been the GPG
> signed one that Josh was going to create from the 1.5.1-rc3
> (c485b41f7). This is a different SHA1 entirely.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:42 PM, <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Repository: accumulo
>> Updated Tags: refs/tags/1.5.1 [created] 6ce236826