You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> on 2006/07/03 07:45:28 UTC
[AXIS2] ReplyTo is not working
Sanjiva,
Can you please chime in on the problem itself [1]? Maybe if we
concentrate on the problem in question rather than dissect the
specific solution we will be better off?
thanks,
dims
PS: I changed the subject as well.
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-user&m=115158272830597&w=2
On 7/2/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 08:51 +0100, David Illsley wrote:
> > Sanjiva, All,
> > I'd still like to make this change. Have you been convinced or do we need
> > more discussion?
>
> I think we need more discussion.
>
> Are you suggesting that we ignore a RelatesTo with a relationship type
> of wsa:Response or with some other relationship?
>
> I do not agree that its correct for the WS-Addressing logic to ignore a
> RelatesTo with a relationship type that *its supposed to understand*
> even if the actual message ID is not recognized.
>
> If you are trying to do that, can you explain why you can't do the same
> with a custom relationship type?
>
> Sanjiva.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://people.apache.org/~dims/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [AXIS2] ReplyTo is not working
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Sanjiva,
Quoting from [1]. There is no guarantee that whoever sent the original
message may not be the recipient of the reply.
/wsa:RelatesTo - This OPTIONAL (repeating) element information item
contributes one abstract [relationship] property value, in the form of
an (IRI, IRI) pair. The content of this element (of type xs:anyURI)
conveys the [message id] of the related message.
/wsa:RelatesTo/@RelationshipType - This OPTIONAL attribute (of type
xs:anyURI) conveys the relationship type as an IRI. When absent, the
implied value of this attribute is
"http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/reply".
The test suite had only 2 nodes. Here we have 3. Which is not
prohibited by the spec. The only reference in the SOAP binding [2] is
how the fault messages are correlated to the original message.
I racked my brain, but cannot see the spec prohibiting any of the
examples / use cases that david mentions in [3]. Could you please do a
quick review as well.
Thanks,
dims
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-ws-addr-core-20060509/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-ws-addr-soap-20060509/
[3] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=114915549611516&w=2
On 7/3/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 01:45 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Sanjiva,
> >
> > Can you please chime in on the problem itself [1]? Maybe if we
> > concentrate on the problem in question rather than dissect the
> > specific solution we will be better off?
>
> Interesting use-case. Is this the scenario that motivated David's
> proposal? David?
>
> Does the WS-Addr spec have anything to say about whether its legit to do
> this kinda stuff? The scenario is that the response message (containing
> a RelatesTo with @relationshipType=wsa:Response) is being used as an
> invocation message for someone else. Didn't the test suite have some
> stuff that checked proper handling of RelatesTo?
>
> Sanjiva.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://people.apache.org/~dims/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [AXIS2] ReplyTo is not working
Posted by David Illsley <da...@uk.ibm.com>.
Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk> wrote on 07/03/2006 08:51:51
AM:
> On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 01:45 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Sanjiva,
> >
> > Can you please chime in on the problem itself [1]? Maybe if we
> > concentrate on the problem in question rather than dissect the
> > specific solution we will be better off?
>
> Interesting use-case. Is this the scenario that motivated David's
> proposal? David?
>
Yes, this is the scenario I'd like to support.
> Does the WS-Addr spec have anything to say about whether its legit to do
> this kinda stuff? The scenario is that the response message (containing
> a RelatesTo with @relationshipType=wsa:Response) is being used as an
> invocation message for someone else. Didn't the test suite have some
> stuff that checked proper handling of RelatesTo?
The spec doesn't say anything about this specific scenario though quite
what the point of separate ReplyTo and FaultTo EPRs is if this isn't
supported escapes me. The other thing to note is that the reply
relationship type is defined very broadly, just defining the semantic and
not tieing it to a particular MEP. Because it isn't explicitly mentioned
in the spec it didn't appear in the test suite.
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [AXIS2] ReplyTo is not working
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 01:45 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Sanjiva,
>
> Can you please chime in on the problem itself [1]? Maybe if we
> concentrate on the problem in question rather than dissect the
> specific solution we will be better off?
Interesting use-case. Is this the scenario that motivated David's
proposal? David?
Does the WS-Addr spec have anything to say about whether its legit to do
this kinda stuff? The scenario is that the response message (containing
a RelatesTo with @relationshipType=wsa:Response) is being used as an
invocation message for someone else. Didn't the test suite have some
stuff that checked proper handling of RelatesTo?
Sanjiva.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org