You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@poi.apache.org by "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org> on 2017/07/10 19:32:05 UTC
[compress] differences in implementation of Zip ibm vs. oracle?
Compress colleagues,
Over on https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275, a user submitted two .xlsx files generated with Apache POI, one by IBM's jvm and one by Oracle's jvm. The file generated with Oracle's jvm opens without issue; however, MSOffice complains but can fix the file generated by IBM's jvm. Winzip opens both without complaining.
Does this ring a bell? Have you seen this before? Anything we can do on our (POI's) side to fix this?
Thank you.
Best,
Tim
Re: [compress] differences in implementation of Zip ibm vs. oracle?
Posted by Simon Spero <se...@gmail.com>.
Is this jdk 8 vs. java SDK 8? The oracle code picked up some fairly big
changes along the way that aren't present in the IBM library. (jdk 9 is
really different from both. I haven't seen what the IBM Java 9 is like
yet).
I will see if anything looks blatantly obvious.
Simon
On Jul 10, 2017 3:32 PM, "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org> wrote:
Compress colleagues,
Over on https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275, a user
submitted two .xlsx files generated with Apache POI, one by IBM's jvm and
one by Oracle's jvm. The file generated with Oracle's jvm opens without
issue; however, MSOffice complains but can fix the file generated by IBM's
jvm. Winzip opens both without complaining.
Does this ring a bell? Have you seen this before? Anything we can do on
our (POI's) side to fix this?
Thank you.
Best,
Tim