[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4592) Fix Formula in Javadocs of NumericRangeQuery

["Commit Tag Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13610455#comment-13610455 ] 

Commit Tag Bot commented on LUCENE-4592:
----------------------------------------

[branch_4x commit] Uwe Schindler
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1418653

Merged revision(s) 1418652 from lucene/dev/trunk:
LUCENE-4592: Improve Javadocs of NumericRangeQuery

                
> Fix Formula in Javadocs of NumericRangeQuery
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4592
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4592
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: general/javadocs
>    Affects Versions: 4.0
>            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>             Fix For: 4.1, 5.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4592.patch, nrq-formula-1.png, nrq-formula-2.png
>
>
> The formula in the JavaDocs of NumericRangeQuery that returns the maximum number of terms in the NRQ's TermsEnum is confusing tthe user.
> I will fix the documentation and also add some more numbers to the of NumericField (e.g. the average number of term in index).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org