You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kibble.apache.org by Sharan Foga <sh...@apache.org> on 2018/09/10 12:56:11 UTC
Re: [DISCUSSION] Reviewing Kibble to against CHAOSS Metrics
Hi All
I've setup a page on our wiki to help with this review.
https://s.apache.org/mEsD
I'm also planning to attend a couple of the CHAOSS calls this week so will post an update. If anyone else wants to join the calls, then the details are as follows:
1) General CHAOSS meeting (every Tuesday) at 11am CDT: https://unomaha.zoom.us/j/720431288
2) Growth, Maturity and Decline workgroup meeting is Wednesday September 12, at 11am CDT. https://unomaha.zoom.us/j/720431288
Thanks
Sharan
On 2018/08/22 09:12:16, Sharan Foga <sh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I think it would be good for us to start looking at the existing metrics that CHAOSS has created and reviewing it against Kibble to see if we have already implemented it.
> If we have then we can add it as known implementation in the CHAOSS repository. This will also help promote Kibble as people will be to see how we conform and can deliver against the CHAOSS metric.
>
> https://github.com/chaoss/metrics/blob/master/2_Growth-Maturity-Decline.md
>
> For example if we look at the Issue Resolution part of the metrics and the questions that have been defined by CHAOSS, I think Kibble can already answer these questions:
>
> 1. Open Issues : What is the number of open issues?
> 2. Closed Issues : What is the number of closed issues?
> 3. Issue Resolution Efficiency : What is the number of closed issues/number of abandoned issues?
> 4. Open Issue Age : What is the the age of open issues?
> 5. First Response to Issue Duration :What is the duration of time for a first response to an issue?
> 6. Closed Issue Resolution Duration : What is the duration of time for issues to be resolved?
>
> So I suggest that we start taking a look at each metric question in isolation (maybe as a separate thread), confirm that Kibble can satisfy (or not) the metric question and then include an example of the Kibble implementation in the example section CHAOSS and also add Kibble as a known implementation of the metric
>
> https://github.com/chaoss/metrics/blob/master/activity-metrics/open-issues.md
>
> What do people think? All comments and feedback welcome.
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] Reviewing Kibble to against CHAOSS Metrics
Posted by Georg Link <gl...@unomaha.edu>.
Hi Sharan,
This looks like a good start.
Quick note on something that we should probably point out on the CHAOSS
repository: The GMD and D&I metrics are being developed in their respective
working groups. While GMD is similar [1], the D&I metrics are changing a
lot [2].
If you find the I metrics that are in the repo helpful as is, we'd love to
know about that too!
Best,
Georg
[1] https://github.com/chaoss/wg-gmd
[2] https://github.com/chaoss/wg-diversity-inclusion
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 7:56 AM, Sharan Foga <sh...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I've setup a page on our wiki to help with this review.
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__s.
> apache.org_mEsD&d=DwIBaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=
> P2SSJg6nDRqSw6MK6ZVW76NaDtv69G3wvyOnOxwzqv0&m=
> 87J8U3yxtcRwCm1EeWybkAVQzIgTfPurBH-Wgne0X5k&s=VoRTAsPstFs9g91idr9m_
> VqRtNv44sptnPooHmhYLmg&e=
>
> I'm also planning to attend a couple of the CHAOSS calls this week so will
> post an update. If anyone else wants to join the calls, then the details
> are as follows:
>
> 1) General CHAOSS meeting (every Tuesday) at 11am CDT:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> unomaha.zoom.us_j_720431288&d=DwIBaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_
> rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=P2SSJg6nDRqSw6MK6ZVW76NaDtv69G3wvyOnOxwzqv0&m=
> 87J8U3yxtcRwCm1EeWybkAVQzIgTfPurBH-Wgne0X5k&s=Az2nMpHFFTJNkuS5jr_
> Z2zDZUH6iwJB3UvUO09dwYZk&e=
>
> 2) Growth, Maturity and Decline workgroup meeting is Wednesday September
> 12, at 11am CDT. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__
> unomaha.zoom.us_j_720431288&d=DwIBaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_
> rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=P2SSJg6nDRqSw6MK6ZVW76NaDtv69G3wvyOnOxwzqv0&m=
> 87J8U3yxtcRwCm1EeWybkAVQzIgTfPurBH-Wgne0X5k&s=Az2nMpHFFTJNkuS5jr_
> Z2zDZUH6iwJB3UvUO09dwYZk&e=
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
>
> On 2018/08/22 09:12:16, Sharan Foga <sh...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I think it would be good for us to start looking at the existing metrics
> that CHAOSS has created and reviewing it against Kibble to see if we have
> already implemented it.
> > If we have then we can add it as known implementation in the CHAOSS
> repository. This will also help promote Kibble as people will be to see how
> we conform and can deliver against the CHAOSS metric.
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.
> com_chaoss_metrics_blob_master_2-5FGrowth-2DMaturity-
> 2DDecline.md&d=DwIBaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=
> P2SSJg6nDRqSw6MK6ZVW76NaDtv69G3wvyOnOxwzqv0&m=
> 87J8U3yxtcRwCm1EeWybkAVQzIgTfPurBH-Wgne0X5k&s=
> SON6xwBiNewx9gUkiDw6HbZbn1gkwNJ91HtSEzBWSzE&e=
> >
> > For example if we look at the Issue Resolution part of the metrics and
> the questions that have been defined by CHAOSS, I think Kibble can already
> answer these questions:
> >
> > 1. Open Issues : What is the number of open issues?
> > 2. Closed Issues : What is the number of closed issues?
> > 3. Issue Resolution Efficiency : What is the number of closed
> issues/number of abandoned issues?
> > 4. Open Issue Age : What is the the age of open issues?
> > 5. First Response to Issue Duration :What is the duration of time for a
> first response to an issue?
> > 6. Closed Issue Resolution Duration : What is the duration of time for
> issues to be resolved?
> >
> > So I suggest that we start taking a look at each metric question in
> isolation (maybe as a separate thread), confirm that Kibble can satisfy (or
> not) the metric question and then include an example of the Kibble
> implementation in the example section CHAOSS and also add Kibble as a known
> implementation of the metric
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.
> com_chaoss_metrics_blob_master_activity-2Dmetrics_
> open-2Dissues.md&d=DwIBaQ&c=Cu5g146wZdoqVuKpTNsYHeFX_rg6kWhlkLF8Eft-wwo&r=
> P2SSJg6nDRqSw6MK6ZVW76NaDtv69G3wvyOnOxwzqv0&m=
> 87J8U3yxtcRwCm1EeWybkAVQzIgTfPurBH-Wgne0X5k&s=
> 9xKNPBc3WJxU9Aeq86DPqvRQfrvaLKUtVTahhNBu8kU&e=
> >
> > What do people think? All comments and feedback welcome.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sharan
> >
> >
>
--
Georg J.P. Link
PhD Student
College of Information Science and Technology | PKI 367
University of Nebraska at Omaha | www.unomaha.edu