Re: mod_perl 2.0 for ISPs

[Ask Bjoern Hansen <as...@valueclick.com>]

On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:

> > but yes, registry scripts would need some sort of protection as well.
> 
> I cannot see where registry scripts differ from handlers, from the 
> access to internals point of view. Once you run under mod_perl it 
> doesn't matter what you do. You've to have protection at the startup 
> (loading user's modules) and at any point at run time, be it a handler 
> or a registry script.

uh; with perl5 it's really hard to properly limit a user. (Safe.pm
doesn't work).


 - ask

-- 
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/         !try; do();
more than a billion impressions per week, http://valueclick.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org