You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu> on 2006/05/26 18:13:09 UTC

OpenEJB for Geronimo Trunk & 1.1

Is Geronimo trunk pointing to a different OpenEJB branch than Geronimo
1.1 is?  (If not, I guess we shouldn't make OpenEJB changes in trunk
yet?)

Also, if OpenEJB moves to Apache, will the current 2.1 branch be
maintained at codehaus or elsewhere so if we need a new 2.1.x release
for Geronimo 1.1.1 we won't need to work through the incubator?

Thanks,
    Aaron

Re: OpenEJB for Geronimo Trunk & 1.1

Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Maybe you want to jump on this thread and post some thoughts.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openejb.devel/3165/focus=3165

I've had a at least one person report not getting mail at  
dev@openejb.codehaus.org.  It turned out to be a matter of mail  
filtering, but looking around the net at the various mail archiving  
sites it seems they're having the same issue.

Let me know if you encounter something odd mail-wise.  Also, watch  
out for the reply-to setup, it's changed.

-David

On May 26, 2006, at 9:13 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

> Is Geronimo trunk pointing to a different OpenEJB branch than Geronimo
> 1.1 is?  (If not, I guess we shouldn't make OpenEJB changes in trunk
> yet?)
>
> Also, if OpenEJB moves to Apache, will the current 2.1 branch be
> maintained at codehaus or elsewhere so if we need a new 2.1.x release
> for Geronimo 1.1.1 we won't need to work through the incubator?
>
> Thanks,
>    Aaron
>