You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to modperl@perl.apache.org by "JupiterHost.Net" <ml...@jupiterhost.net> on 2004/11/20 22:13:40 UTC
Re: Keywords
Anthony Gardner wrote:
> Can someone tell me why sex, sexy, suck and child
hmmm, not 100% sure but:
sex and sexxy describe perl and mod_perl in general :)
suck might be there to describe other bloaty clunky wanna be's :)
For instance say I'm looking for a solution and I type:
"Why does PHP suck and mod_perl doesn't"
"Does mod_perl suck?" (answer is NO BTW ;p)
child perhaps for child processes?
> http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/intro/start_fast.html
HTH :)
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
Re: Keywords
Posted by Anthony Gardner <cy...@yahoo.co.uk>.
Thanks for taking that seriously.
I for one felt very uncomfotable with that. Especially
if we're fighting to get Perl and associated
technologies respected in an ever increasingly
compettive mkt.
I actually thought some hacker had got in and changed
it!!
-Ants
--- Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org> wrote:
> Stas Bekman wrote:
> > Randy Kobes wrote:
> [...]
> >> I, for one, would feel more comfortable with them
> removed.
> >> As you say, at one point they were commonly used
> to boost
> >> rankings, but these days, especially with "child"
> in there,
> >> they have an ugly connotation.
> >
> >
> > sure I'll remove those as soon as I finish
> fighting with svn :(
>
> What a pain. 5 hours later finally built a working
> svn version.
>
> > I'm keeping the 'child' though, for the child
> processes.
>
> This is now done and the website is updated.
>
>
> --
>
__________________________________________________________________
> Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another
> mod_perl Hacker
> http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --->
> http://perl.apache.org
> mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org
> http://apacheweek.com
> http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org
> http://ticketmaster.com
>
> --
> Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
> Mail list info:
> http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
> List etiquette:
> http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
>
>
___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
Re: Keywords
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
[...]
>> I, for one, would feel more comfortable with them removed.
>> As you say, at one point they were commonly used to boost
>> rankings, but these days, especially with "child" in there,
>> they have an ugly connotation.
>
>
> sure I'll remove those as soon as I finish fighting with svn :(
What a pain. 5 hours later finally built a working svn version.
> I'm keeping the 'child' though, for the child processes.
This is now done and the website is updated.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
Re: Keywords
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
Randy Kobes wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>JupiterHost.Net wrote:
>>
>>>Anthony Gardner wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Can someone tell me why sex, sexy, suck and child
>>
>>obviously those are taken out of context :)
>
> [ ... ]
>
>>Let us know if this is no longer useful and we will remove those or
>>replace with something better.
>
>
> I, for one, would feel more comfortable with them removed.
> As you say, at one point they were commonly used to boost
> rankings, but these days, especially with "child" in there,
> they have an ugly connotation.
sure I'll remove those as soon as I finish fighting with svn :(
I'm keeping the 'child' though, for the child processes.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
Re: Keywords
Posted by Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca>.
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> JupiterHost.Net wrote:
> >
> > Anthony Gardner wrote:
> >
> >> Can someone tell me why sex, sexy, suck and child
>
> obviously those are taken out of context :)
[ ... ]
> Let us know if this is no longer useful and we will remove those or
> replace with something better.
I, for one, would feel more comfortable with them removed.
As you say, at one point they were commonly used to boost
rankings, but these days, especially with "child" in there,
they have an ugly connotation.
--
best regards,
randy
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
Re: Keywords
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
JupiterHost.Net wrote:
>
>
> Anthony Gardner wrote:
>
>> Can someone tell me why sex, sexy, suck and child
obviously those are taken out of context :)
> hmmm, not 100% sure but:
>
> sex and sexxy describe perl and mod_perl in general :)
> suck might be there to describe other bloaty clunky wanna be's :)
> For instance say I'm looking for a solution and I type:
> "Why does PHP suck and mod_perl doesn't"
> "Does mod_perl suck?" (answer is NO BTW ;p)
>
> child perhaps for child processes?
That's correct.
And don't forget: http://scroogie.de/pix/data/media/2/mod_perl.jpg :)
You can blame me for that keywords selection. Those keywords were added at
the time when search engines were looking at keywords to make up the
ranking. I just saw other sites using those and I've copied from them. I'm
not sure if those are relevant anymore these days.
Let us know if this is no longer useful and we will remove those or
replace with something better.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html