You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fx-dev@ws.apache.org by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> on 2004/06/02 16:28:50 UTC
Re: WS-SecureConversation Implementation
Dimuthu,
FYI - http://benjaminm.net/PermaLink.aspx?guid=cd6b79f4-301a-4c39-bccb-178af1e5ee80
-- dims
On Thu, 27 May 2004 03:54:44 -0400, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> #1: New versions of the specs are already out -
> http://www3.ca.com/Solutions/Collateral.asp?CID=59565&ID=4714
>
> #2: WSE 2.0 Final is out as well -
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=FC5F06C5-821F-41D3-A4FE-6C7B56423841&displaylang=en
>
> WSE 2.0 Final implements the updated WS-Trust and
> WS-SecureConversation specs (#1). So please don't code to the old
> spec. Let's use the new spec.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> PS: Please send emails directly to the mailing list. thanks.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dimuthu Leelarathne. <mu...@opensource.lk>
> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 11:04:24 +0600
> Subject: WS-SecureConversation Implementation
> To: dims@yahoo.com
>
> Hi Dims,
>
> We decided to continue coding according to the
> current specification, and later adapt to the changes in the new specification.
> We talked to Dr.Sanjiva about the issue and he agreed.
>
> In order to sign from derived keys we need
> hmac-sha1 algorithm (with the namespace
> http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#hmac-sha1)
> to be supported in WSS4J. What should we do now?
>
> When can we commit what we have done up to
> now?
>
> Thanks,
> Ruchith, Kaushalye, Dimuthu.
>
"one line" solutions [Re: WS-SecureConversation Implementation
Posted by Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu>.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>Dimuthu,
>
>FYI - http://benjaminm.net/PermaLink.aspx?guid=cd6b79f4-301a-4c39-bccb-178af1e5ee80
>
>
>
"one line" solutions - they look good and are perfect under one
condition if they work _always_ otherwise you need mroe support in
runtime to deal with "leaky abstractions"
i always wondered what is the best way to support problem resolution in
such case.
in other words: how to do tracing/debugging such distributed systems
when such fundamental chnage can be done by just tweaking one
configuration parameter ...
alek
>-- dims
>
>On Thu, 27 May 2004 03:54:44 -0400, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>#1: New versions of the specs are already out -
>>http://www3.ca.com/Solutions/Collateral.asp?CID=59565&ID=4714
>>
>>#2: WSE 2.0 Final is out as well -
>>http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=FC5F06C5-821F-41D3-A4FE-6C7B56423841&displaylang=en
>>
>>WSE 2.0 Final implements the updated WS-Trust and
>>WS-SecureConversation specs (#1). So please don't code to the old
>>spec. Let's use the new spec.
>>
>>thanks,
>>dims
>>
>>PS: Please send emails directly to the mailing list. thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Dimuthu Leelarathne. <mu...@opensource.lk>
>>Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 11:04:24 +0600
>>Subject: WS-SecureConversation Implementation
>>To: dims@yahoo.com
>>
>>Hi Dims,
>>
>>We decided to continue coding according to the
>>current specification, and later adapt to the changes in the new specification.
>>We talked to Dr.Sanjiva about the issue and he agreed.
>>
>>In order to sign from derived keys we need
>>hmac-sha1 algorithm (with the namespace
>>http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#hmac-sha1)
>>to be supported in WSS4J. What should we do now?
>>
>>When can we commit what we have done up to
>>now?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Ruchith, Kaushalye, Dimuthu.
>>
>>
>>
--
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay