You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Michael Geiger <ge...@mgeiger.de> on 2008/05/20 12:06:12 UTC
problem with shortcircuit
Hello, I just found a problem with a shortcircuit rule in my sa
installation (3.2.4)!
I have defined in local.cf:
header MAILMAN ALL =~
/-(bounces|confirm|join|leave|request|subscribe|unsubscribe)\@lists\.xxx\.xxx/i
describe MAILMAN Mailman whitelisted
shortcircuit MAILMAN ham
This rule hit on a mail to xxx-request@lists.xxx.xxx:
spamd: identified spam (9.8/6.0) for filter:2525 in 0.6 seconds, 824 bytes.
spamd: result: Y 9 -
MAILMAN,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL
scantime=0.6,size=824,user=filter,uid=2525,required_score=6.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=48543,mid=<48...@xxx.xxx>,autolearn=disabled,shortcircuit=ham
The score was not set to shortcircuit_ham_score (default -100, not
defined in my config).
What's wrong here?
Michael
Re: problem with shortcircuit
Posted by Michael Geiger <ge...@mgeiger.de>.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas schrieb:
> On 20.05.08 12:06, Michael Geiger wrote:
>> Hello, I just found a problem with a shortcircuit rule in my sa
>> installation (3.2.4)!
>
> shortcircuiting is not as easy as it seems. Many kinds of different checks
> are run in parallel, some are run before others. To get shortcircuit
> working, you must increase priority of a rule enough.
Well, the docs tell me that shortcircuit ham is automatically setting
the priority to -100 ... must the priority be lower than this to run first?
Michael
Re: problem with shortcircuit
Posted by Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>.
On 20.05.08 12:06, Michael Geiger wrote:
> Hello, I just found a problem with a shortcircuit rule in my sa
> installation (3.2.4)!
shortcircuiting is not as easy as it seems. Many kinds of different checks
are run in parallel, some are run before others. To get shortcircuit
working, you must increase priority of a rule enough.
> I have defined in local.cf:
>
> header MAILMAN ALL =~
> /-(bounces|confirm|join|leave|request|subscribe|unsubscribe)\@lists\.xxx\.xxx/i
> describe MAILMAN Mailman whitelisted
> shortcircuit MAILMAN ham
>
>
> This rule hit on a mail to xxx-request@lists.xxx.xxx:
>
> spamd: identified spam (9.8/6.0) for filter:2525 in 0.6 seconds, 824 bytes.
> spamd: result: Y 9 -
> MAILMAN,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL
> scantime=0.6,size=824,user=filter,uid=2525,required_score=6.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=48543,mid=<48...@xxx.xxx>,autolearn=disabled,shortcircuit=ham
>
>
> The score was not set to shortcircuit_ham_score (default -100, not
> defined in my config).
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory.