You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to modperl@perl.apache.org by pb...@gmail.com on 2005/12/18 20:34:55 UTC

Status of mod_perl 2?

Hello,

What is the current status of mod_perl 2?  Is it considered stable enough
for production use?

Thanks,
David

Re: Status of mod_perl 2?

Posted by "Philip M. Gollucci" <pg...@p6m7g8.com>.
Read the website!

http://perl.apache.org



------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Love is not the one you can picture yourself marrying,
but the one you can't picture the rest of your life without."

"It takes a minute to have a crush on someone, an hour to like someone,
and a day to love someone, but it takes a lifetime to forget someone..."

Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) 301.254.5198
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com


On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, pbdgny@gmail.com wrote:

> Hello,
>
> What is the current status of mod_perl 2?  Is it considered stable enough
> for production use?
>
> Thanks,
> David
>

Re: Status of mod_perl 2?

Posted by JT Smith <jt...@plainblack.com>.
>> What is the current status of mod_perl 2?  Is it considered stable
>> enough for production use?


Absolutely. We've built our CMS product around mod_perl 2 and have it running 
successfully on more than 15,000 implementations. It is certainly production ready.



JT ~ Plain Black
ph: 703-286-2525 ext. 810
fax: 312-264-5382
http://www.plainblack.com

I reject your reality, and substitute my own. ~ Adam Savage

Re: Status of mod_perl 2?

Posted by Frank Wiles <fr...@wiles.org>.
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:34:55 -0500
<pb...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
> What is the current status of mod_perl 2?  Is it considered stable
> enough for production use?

  Yes! I use it in production all the time. 

 ---------------------------------
   Frank Wiles <fr...@wiles.org>
   http://www.wiles.org
 ---------------------------------