You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by "Richard Liang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/02/15 02:33:31 UTC
[jira] Commented: (HARMONY-92) Suggestion: Move com.ibm.platform
from NIO to LUNI
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-92?page=comments#action_12366423 ]
Richard Liang commented on HARMONY-92:
--------------------------------------
According to the "package naming convention" (http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/pkgnaming.html), I suggest we rename com.ibm.platform to org.apache.harmony.luni.platform, and com.ibm.platform.struct to org.apache.harmony.luni.platform.struct
Any comments?
> Suggestion: Move com.ibm.platform from NIO to LUNI
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HARMONY-92
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-92
> Project: Harmony
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Classlib
> Reporter: Richard Liang
>
> Hello Tim,
> As we discussed in JIRA 27 and JIRA 42, I suggest we move the packages com.ibm.platform and com.ibm.platform.struct from NIO to LUNI component. As these packages are used by java.net, as well as java.nio.channels. I will post the proposed fix soon :-)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira