You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pivot.apache.org by Sandro Martini <sa...@gmail.com> on 2009/08/21 12:09:20 UTC
Missing Disabled components from Kitchen Sink
Hi to all,
what do you thing on adding some missing components (in my opinion) in
the Tutorial (maybe in a dedicated disabled subpanel):
- push buttons disabled and pressed
- a rollup disabled
- opt other elements disabled ...
to see in there are visual problems with elements in this state (for
example could be less in evidence that they are disabled ...).
I found a small bug of this situation in other Java Frameworks, so why
not to try ?
Bye,
Sandro
Re: Missing Disabled components from Kitchen Sink
Posted by Sandro Martini <sa...@gmail.com>.
> It is possible to disable any component, so I don't think we explicitly need
> to demonstrate it for every component type we have. On the other hand, you
> make a good point about verifying that each component type correctly handles
> a disabled state. That's why I think it belongs in test. You are welcome to
> create some test cases for this.
Ok, I'll try it after the current things ...
Bye
Re: Missing Disabled components from Kitchen Sink
Posted by Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com>.
> For Substance, I asked to add a sample of PushButton pressed and
> disabled, and was a (little, ok) feature useful to see. Maybe also the
> disabled rollup could be useful here, to show users that's possible,
> and how it is.
It is possible to disable any component, so I don't think we
explicitly need to demonstrate it for every component type we have. On
the other hand, you make a good point about verifying that each
component type correctly handles a disabled state. That's why I think
it belongs in test. You are welcome to create some test cases for this.
Re: Missing Disabled components from Kitchen Sink
Posted by Sandro Martini <sa...@gmail.com>.
For Substance, I asked to add a sample of PushButton pressed and
disabled, and was a (little, ok) feature useful to see. Maybe also the
disabled rollup could be useful here, to show users that's possible,
and how it is.
Tell me what to do.
Sandro
Re: Missing Disabled components from Kitchen Sink
Posted by Greg Brown <gk...@mac.com>.
We have some examples of disable buttons in the Kitchen Sink app.
I agree that we should ensure that our disabled components behave
correctly, but I think this kind of thing probably belongs in the test
package rather than the tutorials.
On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:09 AM, Sandro Martini wrote:
> Hi to all,
> what do you thing on adding some missing components (in my opinion) in
> the Tutorial (maybe in a dedicated disabled subpanel):
>
> - push buttons disabled and pressed
> - a rollup disabled
> - opt other elements disabled ...
>
> to see in there are visual problems with elements in this state (for
> example could be less in evidence that they are disabled ...).
> I found a small bug of this situation in other Java Frameworks, so why
> not to try ?
>
> Bye,
> Sandro