You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by "Dan LaRocque (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/09/26 21:10:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-2302) Add isOnGraphComputer() field
accessor to ElementMapStep
Dan LaRocque created TINKERPOP-2302:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Add isOnGraphComputer() field accessor to ElementMapStep
Key: TINKERPOP-2302
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2302
Project: TinkerPop
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: process
Affects Versions: 3.5.0, 3.4.4
Reporter: Dan LaRocque
TINKERPOP-2284 added {{ElementMapStep}}.
This step implements {{GraphComputing}}, so it defines that interface's {{onGraphComputer()}} method. The method sets a private boolean field.
For any implementation that wants to alter {{ElementMapStep}} behavior by replacing instances of the step with an alternative implementation (maybe a subclass), it could be convenient to make private the {{onGraphComputer}} state accessible. I think the rest of {{ElementMapStep}}'s public state is already accessible; it's just this field that is private.
There are a few ways to go about this.
* We could add an {{isOnGraphComputer()}} method to just {{ElementMapStep}}, or by making {{onGraphComputer}} protected. This is the narrowest version of the change.
* We could add an {{isOnGraphComputer()}} method to the {{GraphComputing}} interface. This would affect a bunch of implementing steps. Most implementations on tp34 have in internal boolean field storing this state, so it would be easy on those. However, [{{GraphStep}} does not have a boolean onGraphComputer field|https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/tp34/gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/map/GraphStep.java#L131-L135]:
{code}
@Override
public void onGraphComputer() {
this.iteratorSupplier = Collections::emptyIterator;
convertElementsToIds();
}
{code}
We could maybe implement this without adding another field, but it would be simpler to do that.
*Altering this interface would also break any third-party implementations of {{GraphComputing}}.*
* We could add create a {{GraphComputing}} subinterface that adds an {{isOnGraphComputer()}}, and only implement it where it's already made simple to do by the existence of a boolean field. This somewhere in between the first two approaches in terms of scope.
I'm going to open a PR taking the first, narrowest possible approach, where I'm only touching {{ElementMapStep}}. I'd be happy to rework it to one of the alternatives, if desired.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)