You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Delos <da...@gmail.com> on 2010/02/09 07:05:40 UTC
[VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0 Spec API.
Ivan has run the signature testing and some el related testcases.
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
The svn location is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
--
Best Regards,
Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Delos <da...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Kevan!
在 2010年2月11日 下午10:36，Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>写道：
> OK. Looks good now.
>
> Here's my +1. Give this an additional 72 hours. Since artifacts were
> changed. Would be best for Donald and Ivan to vote on your updates. Also,
> will be waiting on TCK results.
>
> --kevan
>
> On Feb 11, 2010, at 5:12 AM, Delos wrote:
>
> extend the voting for more people to look at it
>
> 在 2010年2月10日 上午10:14，Delos <da...@gmail.com>写道：
>
>> The staging repository is not synchronized with tags. I have recreated it
>> in
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009
>>
>> In previous voting, Donald told me the license information for W3C and OMG
>> can be removed, since they're already in the common LICENSE file of geronimo
>> specs. So the tag content should be right.
>>
>>
>> 在 2010年2月10日 上午1:26，Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>写道：
>>
>>
>>> The subversion tag does not match the contents of your source
>>> distribution (you've updated the LICENSE file in your source distribution).
>>> IMO, the source distribution is correct (and this is what we are really
>>> voting on). However, IMO the subversion tag should match the contents of
>>> your source distribution. So, will vote -1, until this is fixed.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, everything else looks good -- source, signatures/checksums,
>>> build.
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>>
>>> On Feb 9, 2010, at 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0 Spec
>>> API. Ivan has run the signature testing and some el related testcases.
>>>
>>> Staging repo:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
>>>
>>> The svn location is here:
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
>>>
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Delos
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Delos
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Delos <da...@gmail.com>.
It has passed full TCK test and got enough vote.
+1: Kevan, Rick, Jay, Donald
Thanks!
2010/3/8 Rex Wang <rw...@gmail.com>
> Thanks Ivan, could you please help run the tck with the txmanager-2.1.4?
>
> 2010/3/8 Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>
>
> I have run all the TCK cases with geronimo-el 1.0.2, and all the cases
>> passed. Will update the version number in 2.1 branch later.
>>
>> 2010/3/1 Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>
>>
>> Yes, that is what we have done in the past before releasing new versions
>>> of the Java EE 5 specs.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/28/10 9:36 PM, Delos wrote:
>>> > What does "full TCK" mean? Does it mean we need to run a full TCK on
>>> > Geronimo with el_spec of new version?
>>> >
>>> > 2010/3/1 Delos <daition@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2010/2/15 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com
>>> > <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Delos wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has passed TCK test. Is
>>> > that enough?
>>> >
>>> > No. There needs to be a full TCK run. Unless I misunderstood,
>>> > that hasn't happened.
>>> >
>>> > --kevan
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Best Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Delos
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Best Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Delos
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ivan
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lei Wang (Rex)
> rwonly AT apache.org
>
--
Best Regards,
Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Rex Wang <rw...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Ivan, could you please help run the tck with the txmanager-2.1.4?
2010/3/8 Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>
> I have run all the TCK cases with geronimo-el 1.0.2, and all the cases
> passed. Will update the version number in 2.1 branch later.
>
> 2010/3/1 Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>
>
> Yes, that is what we have done in the past before releasing new versions
>> of the Java EE 5 specs.
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 2/28/10 9:36 PM, Delos wrote:
>> > What does "full TCK" mean? Does it mean we need to run a full TCK on
>> > Geronimo with el_spec of new version?
>> >
>> > 2010/3/1 Delos <daition@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2010/2/15 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com
>> > <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Delos wrote:
>> >
>> > > I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has passed TCK test. Is
>> > that enough?
>> >
>> > No. There needs to be a full TCK run. Unless I misunderstood,
>> > that hasn't happened.
>> >
>> > --kevan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards,
>> >
>> > Delos
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards,
>> >
>> > Delos
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>
--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
I have run all the TCK cases with geronimo-el 1.0.2, and all the cases
passed. Will update the version number in 2.1 branch later.
2010/3/1 Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>
> Yes, that is what we have done in the past before releasing new versions
> of the Java EE 5 specs.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 2/28/10 9:36 PM, Delos wrote:
> > What does "full TCK" mean? Does it mean we need to run a full TCK on
> > Geronimo with el_spec of new version?
> >
> > 2010/3/1 Delos <daition@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >
> >
> >
> > 2010/2/15 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com
> > <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >
> >
> > On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Delos wrote:
> >
> > > I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has passed TCK test. Is
> > that enough?
> >
> > No. There needs to be a full TCK run. Unless I misunderstood,
> > that hasn't happened.
> >
> > --kevan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Delos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Delos
>
--
Ivan
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Yes, that is what we have done in the past before releasing new versions
of the Java EE 5 specs.
-Donald
On 2/28/10 9:36 PM, Delos wrote:
> What does "full TCK" mean? Does it mean we need to run a full TCK on
> Geronimo with el_spec of new version?
>
> 2010/3/1 Delos <daition@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>
>
>
> 2010/2/15 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>>
>
>
> On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Delos wrote:
>
> > I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has passed TCK test. Is
> that enough?
>
> No. There needs to be a full TCK run. Unless I misunderstood,
> that hasn't happened.
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Delos <da...@gmail.com>.
What does "full TCK" mean? Does it mean we need to run a full TCK on
Geronimo with el_spec of new version?
2010/3/1 Delos <da...@gmail.com>
>
>
> 2010/2/15 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>
>
>> On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Delos wrote:
>>
>> > I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has passed TCK test. Is that
>> enough?
>>
>> No. There needs to be a full TCK run. Unless I misunderstood, that hasn't
>> happened.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>
--
Best Regards,
Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Delos <da...@gmail.com>.
2010/2/15 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>
> On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Delos wrote:
>
> > I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has passed TCK test. Is that enough?
>
> No. There needs to be a full TCK run. Unless I misunderstood, that hasn't
> happened.
>
> --kevan
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Delos:
Seems that the temp repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009 is
not available.
Could you recover it, it might need to run the TCK.
2010/2/16 Delos <da...@gmail.com>
> I see.
>
> Since Ivan didn't give any response these days, could anyone else help to
> do a full TCK test on it?
>
> Thanks!
>
> 2010/2/15 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>
>
>> On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Delos wrote:
>>
>> > I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has passed TCK test. Is that
>> enough?
>>
>> No. There needs to be a full TCK run. Unless I misunderstood, that hasn't
>> happened.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>
--
Ivan
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Delos <da...@gmail.com>.
I see.
Since Ivan didn't give any response these days, could anyone else help to do
a full TCK test on it?
Thanks!
2010/2/15 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>
> On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Delos wrote:
>
> > I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has passed TCK test. Is that enough?
>
> No. There needs to be a full TCK run. Unless I misunderstood, that hasn't
> happened.
>
> --kevan
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 15, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Delos wrote:
> I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has passed TCK test. Is that enough?
No. There needs to be a full TCK run. Unless I misunderstood, that hasn't happened.
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Delos <da...@gmail.com>.
I find Ivan's reply told the el spec has passed TCK test. Is that enough?
2010/2/14 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 9:50 PM, Delos wrote:
>
> > Could any PMC member help to review it?Thanks!
>
> Unless I'm mistaken, TCK results are needed, also.
>
> --kevan
>
--
Best Regards,
Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 12, 2010, at 9:50 PM, Delos wrote:
> Could any PMC member help to review it?Thanks!
Unless I'm mistaken, TCK results are needed, also.
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Delos <da...@gmail.com>.
Could any PMC member help to review it?Thanks!
在 2010年2月12日 下午10:45，Delos <da...@gmail.com>写道：
> Seems Ivan hasn't seen the update. Could any other PMC member help to take
> a look at this? Thanks a lot!
>
> 在 2010年2月12日 上午9:38，Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>写道：
>
> +1 Updates look good.
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 2/11/10 9:36 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> > OK. Looks good now.
>> >
>> > Here's my +1. Give this an additional 72 hours. Since artifacts were
>> > changed. Would be best for Donald and Ivan to vote on your updates.
>> > Also, will be waiting on TCK results.
>> >
>> > --kevan
>> >
>> > On Feb 11, 2010, at 5:12 AM, Delos wrote:
>> >
>> >> extend the voting for more people to look at it
>> >>
>> >> 在 2010年2月10日 上午10:14，Delos <daition@gmail.com
>> >> <ma...@gmail.com>>写道：
>> >>
>> >> The staging repository is not synchronized with tags. I have
>> >> recreated it in
>> >>
>> >> Staging repo:
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009
>> >>
>> >> In previous voting, Donald told me the license information for W3C
>> >> and OMG can be removed, since they're already in the common
>> >> LICENSE file of geronimo specs. So the tag content should be right.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 在 2010年2月10日 上午1:26，Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com
>> >> <ma...@gmail.com>>写道：
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The subversion tag does not match the contents of your source
>> >> distribution (you've updated the LICENSE file in your source
>> >> distribution). IMO, the source distribution is correct (and
>> >> this is what we are really voting on). However, IMO the
>> >> subversion tag should match the contents of your source
>> >> distribution. So, will vote -1, until this is fixed.
>> >>
>> >> Otherwise, everything else looks good -- source,
>> >> signatures/checksums, build.
>> >>
>> >> --kevan
>> >>
>> >> On Feb 9, 2010, at 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression
>> >>> Language）1.0 Spec API. Ivan has run the signature testing
>> >>> and some el related testcases.
>> >>>
>> >>> Staging repo:
>> >>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
>> >>>
>> >>> The svn location is here:
>> >>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >>>
>> >>> [ ] +1 approve
>> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Best Regards,
>> >>>
>> >>> Delos
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Delos
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Delos
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>
--
Best Regards,
Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Delos <da...@gmail.com>.
Seems Ivan hasn't seen the update. Could any other PMC member help to take a
look at this? Thanks a lot!
在 2010年2月12日 上午9:38，Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>写道：
> +1 Updates look good.
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 2/11/10 9:36 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> > OK. Looks good now.
> >
> > Here's my +1. Give this an additional 72 hours. Since artifacts were
> > changed. Would be best for Donald and Ivan to vote on your updates.
> > Also, will be waiting on TCK results.
> >
> > --kevan
> >
> > On Feb 11, 2010, at 5:12 AM, Delos wrote:
> >
> >> extend the voting for more people to look at it
> >>
> >> 在 2010年2月10日 上午10:14，Delos <daition@gmail.com
> >> <ma...@gmail.com>>写道：
> >>
> >> The staging repository is not synchronized with tags. I have
> >> recreated it in
> >>
> >> Staging repo:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009
> >>
> >> In previous voting, Donald told me the license information for W3C
> >> and OMG can be removed, since they're already in the common
> >> LICENSE file of geronimo specs. So the tag content should be right.
> >>
> >>
> >> 在 2010年2月10日 上午1:26，Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com
> >> <ma...@gmail.com>>写道：
> >>
> >>
> >> The subversion tag does not match the contents of your source
> >> distribution (you've updated the LICENSE file in your source
> >> distribution). IMO, the source distribution is correct (and
> >> this is what we are really voting on). However, IMO the
> >> subversion tag should match the contents of your source
> >> distribution. So, will vote -1, until this is fixed.
> >>
> >> Otherwise, everything else looks good -- source,
> >> signatures/checksums, build.
> >>
> >> --kevan
> >>
> >> On Feb 9, 2010, at 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression
> >>> Language）1.0 Spec API. Ivan has run the signature testing
> >>> and some el related testcases.
> >>>
> >>> Staging repo:
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
> >>>
> >>> The svn location is here:
> >>>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Delos
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Delos
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Delos
> >
>
--
Best Regards,
Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
+1 Updates look good.
-Donald
On 2/11/10 9:36 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> OK. Looks good now.
>
> Here's my +1. Give this an additional 72 hours. Since artifacts were
> changed. Would be best for Donald and Ivan to vote on your updates.
> Also, will be waiting on TCK results.
>
> --kevan
>
> On Feb 11, 2010, at 5:12 AM, Delos wrote:
>
>> extend the voting for more people to look at it
>>
>> 在 2010年2月10日 上午10:14，Delos <daition@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>>写道：
>>
>> The staging repository is not synchronized with tags. I have
>> recreated it in
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009
>>
>> In previous voting, Donald told me the license information for W3C
>> and OMG can be removed, since they're already in the common
>> LICENSE file of geronimo specs. So the tag content should be right.
>>
>>
>> 在 2010年2月10日 上午1:26，Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>>写道：
>>
>>
>> The subversion tag does not match the contents of your source
>> distribution (you've updated the LICENSE file in your source
>> distribution). IMO, the source distribution is correct (and
>> this is what we are really voting on). However, IMO the
>> subversion tag should match the contents of your source
>> distribution. So, will vote -1, until this is fixed.
>>
>> Otherwise, everything else looks good -- source,
>> signatures/checksums, build.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>> On Feb 9, 2010, at 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression
>>> Language）1.0 Spec API. Ivan has run the signature testing
>>> and some el related testcases.
>>>
>>> Staging repo:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
>>>
>>> The svn location is here:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
>>>
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Delos
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Delos
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Delos
>
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
OK. Looks good now.
Here's my +1. Give this an additional 72 hours. Since artifacts were changed. Would be best for Donald and Ivan to vote on your updates. Also, will be waiting on TCK results.
--kevan
On Feb 11, 2010, at 5:12 AM, Delos wrote:
> extend the voting for more people to look at it
>
> 在 2010年2月10日 上午10:14，Delos <da...@gmail.com>写道：
> The staging repository is not synchronized with tags. I have recreated it in
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009
>
> In previous voting, Donald told me the license information for W3C and OMG can be removed, since they're already in the common LICENSE file of geronimo specs. So the tag content should be right.
>
>
> 在 2010年2月10日 上午1:26，Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>写道：
>
>
> The subversion tag does not match the contents of your source distribution (you've updated the LICENSE file in your source distribution). IMO, the source distribution is correct (and this is what we are really voting on). However, IMO the subversion tag should match the contents of your source distribution. So, will vote -1, until this is fixed.
>
> Otherwise, everything else looks good -- source, signatures/checksums, build.
>
> --kevan
>
> On Feb 9, 2010, at 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
>
>> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0 Spec API. Ivan has run the signature testing and some el related testcases.
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
>>
>> The svn location is here:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
>>
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Delos
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Delos <da...@gmail.com>.
extend the voting for more people to look at it
在 2010年2月10日 上午10:14，Delos <da...@gmail.com>写道：
> The staging repository is not synchronized with tags. I have recreated it
> in
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009
>
> In previous voting, Donald told me the license information for W3C and OMG
> can be removed, since they're already in the common LICENSE file of geronimo
> specs. So the tag content should be right.
>
>
> 在 2010年2月10日 上午1:26，Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>写道：
>
>
>> The subversion tag does not match the contents of your source distribution
>> (you've updated the LICENSE file in your source distribution). IMO, the
>> source distribution is correct (and this is what we are really voting on).
>> However, IMO the subversion tag should match the contents of your source
>> distribution. So, will vote -1, until this is fixed.
>>
>> Otherwise, everything else looks good -- source, signatures/checksums,
>> build.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>> On Feb 9, 2010, at 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0 Spec API.
>> Ivan has run the signature testing and some el related testcases.
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
>>
>> The svn location is here:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
>>
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Delos
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>
--
Best Regards,
Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Delos <da...@gmail.com>.
The staging repository is not synchronized with tags. I have recreated it
in
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009
In previous voting, Donald told me the license information for W3C and OMG
can be removed, since they're already in the common LICENSE file of geronimo
specs. So the tag content should be right.
在 2010年2月10日 上午1:26，Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>写道：
>
> The subversion tag does not match the contents of your source distribution
> (you've updated the LICENSE file in your source distribution). IMO, the
> source distribution is correct (and this is what we are really voting on).
> However, IMO the subversion tag should match the contents of your source
> distribution. So, will vote -1, until this is fixed.
>
> Otherwise, everything else looks good -- source, signatures/checksums,
> build.
>
> --kevan
>
> On Feb 9, 2010, at 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
>
> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0 Spec API.
> Ivan has run the signature testing and some el related testcases.
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
>
> The svn location is here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
The subversion tag does not match the contents of your source distribution (you've updated the LICENSE file in your source distribution). IMO, the source distribution is correct (and this is what we are really voting on). However, IMO the subversion tag should match the contents of your source distribution. So, will vote -1, until this is fixed.
Otherwise, everything else looks good -- source, signatures/checksums, build.
--kevan
On Feb 9, 2010, at 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0 Spec API. Ivan has run the signature testing and some el related testcases.
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
>
> The svn location is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
I have run the signature testing and some el related testcases with the
commands below:
./runtests signaturetest
./runttests com/sun/ts/tests/jsp/api/javax_el
>From the log files, all el related cases passed. If I did not miss any
testcase, el package should pass the TCK.
+1
在 2010年2月9日 下午9:48，Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>写道：
> +1
>
> Passed mvn rat:check
> Was able to build it from the tag.
> JAR file has the required Notice/License files.
> I didn't perform any TCK testing on it.
>
> -Donald
>
> On 2/9/10 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
> > Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0 Spec
> > API. Ivan has run the signature testing and some el related testcases.
> >
> > Staging repo:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
> >
> > The svn location is here:
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
> >
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Delos
>
--
Ivan
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
+1
Passed mvn rat:check
Was able to build it from the tag.
JAR file has the required Notice/License files.
I didn't perform any TCK testing on it.
-Donald
On 2/9/10 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0 Spec
> API. Ivan has run the signature testing and some el related testcases.
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
>
> The svn location is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Jay McHugh <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1
Jay
2010/2/9 Delos <da...@gmail.com>:
> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0 Spec API.
> Ivan has run the signature testing and some el related testcases.
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
>
> The svn location is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Delos <da...@gmail.com>.
I think Ivan may help to provide TCK result for this. Thanks!
在 2010年2月15日 下午6:34，Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>写道：
> +1
>
> On 2/9/2010 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
> > Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0
> > Spec API. Ivan has run the signature testing and some el related
> > testcases.
> >
> > Staging repo:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
> >
> > The svn location is here:
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
> >
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Delos
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 2/9/2010 1:05 AM, Delos wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0
> Spec API. Ivan has run the signature testing and some el related
> testcases.
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
>
> The svn location is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2 (2nd try)
Posted by Delos <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me -:) Hope PMC members can take a look at this! Thanks!
在 2010年2月9日 下午2:05，Delos <da...@gmail.com>写道：
> Hi, I'd like to release v1.0.2 of the EL（Expression Language）1.0 Spec API.
> Ivan has run the signature testing and some el related testcases.
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-071/
>
> The svn location is here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.2/
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Delos
>
--
Best Regards,
Delos