You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Carsten Ziegeler <c....@web.de> on 2003/04/15 12:51:27 UTC

Bugfix for cocoon-reload

Hi,

thanks to the report from Geoff, I was able to fix the cocoon-reload problem
we currently have in 2.1-dev tonight ;).
As I currenlty don't have access to CVS, can someone else please change
the constructors of the CocoonComponentManager as shown below
(the setting of the rootManager has changed):

public CocoonComponentManager(final ClassLoader loader) {
    super( null, loader );
    rootManager = this;
}

public CocoonComponentManager(final ComponentManager manager, final ClassLoader loader) {
    super( manager, loader );
    if (rootManager != manager) rootManager = this;
}

public CocoonComponentManager(final ComponentManager manager,) {
    super( manager);
    if (rootManager != manager) rootManager = this;
}

(PS: I handtyped the code above, so it can't guarantee that there is no syntax
error, but I guess the idea is visible).

With the changes above, cocoon-reload works again (at least on my machine :) )

Thanks
Carsten


Carsten Ziegeler
c.ziegeler@web.de
______________________________________________________________________________
UNICEF bittet um Spenden fur die Kinder im Irak! Hier online an
UNICEF spenden: https://spenden.web.de/unicef/special/?mc=021101

RE: Bugfix for cocoon-reload

Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de>.

Thanks, Giacomo for applying!

Carsten

> -----Original Message-----
> From: giacomo@lapgp.otego.com [mailto:giacomo@lapgp.otego.com]On Behalf
> Of Giacomo Pati
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 3:17 PM
> To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Bugfix for cocoon-reload
> 
> 
> 
> Patch applied.
> 
> Thanks, Carsten.
> 
> Giacomo
>

Re: Bugfix for cocoon-reload

Posted by Giacomo Pati <gi...@apache.org>.

Patch applied.

Thanks, Carsten.

Giacomo

On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

> Hi,
>
> thanks to the report from Geoff, I was able to fix the cocoon-reload problem
> we currently have in 2.1-dev tonight ;).
> As I currenlty don't have access to CVS, can someone else please change
> the constructors of the CocoonComponentManager as shown below
> (the setting of the rootManager has changed):
>
> public CocoonComponentManager(final ClassLoader loader) {
>     super( null, loader );
>     rootManager = this;
> }
>
> public CocoonComponentManager(final ComponentManager manager, final ClassLoader loader) {
>     super( manager, loader );
>     if (rootManager != manager) rootManager = this;
> }
>
> public CocoonComponentManager(final ComponentManager manager,) {
>     super( manager);
>     if (rootManager != manager) rootManager = this;
> }
>
> (PS: I handtyped the code above, so it can't guarantee that there is no syntax
> error, but I guess the idea is visible).
>
> With the changes above, cocoon-reload works again (at least on my machine :) )
>
> Thanks
> Carsten
>
>
> Carsten Ziegeler
> c.ziegeler@web.de
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> UNICEF bittet um Spenden fur die Kinder im Irak! Hier online an
> UNICEF spenden: https://spenden.web.de/unicef/special/?mc=021101
>
>
>
>

RE: Bugfix for cocoon-reload

Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de>.


> From: Geoff Howard [mailto:cocoon@leverageweb.com]
> > (PS: I handtyped the code above, so it can't guarantee that there 
> > is no syntax
> > error, but I guess the idea is visible).
> 
> What do you usually type with? ;)
> 
I usually use Eclipse, but I didn't have internet access for my pc;
I only had internet access on a different PC without any connection
between them :), so I had to retype everything...

Carsten

RE: Bugfix for cocoon-reload

Posted by Geoff Howard <co...@leverageweb.com>.

Excellent - thanks!  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:c.ziegeler@web.de]
> 
> thanks to the report from Geoff, I was able to fix the 
> cocoon-reload problem
> we currently have in 2.1-dev tonight ;).

<snip/>

> (PS: I handtyped the code above, so it can't guarantee that there 
> is no syntax
> error, but I guess the idea is visible).

What do you usually type with? ;)

Geoff