Call for Logo

[Thomas Scholzen <ts...@buche17.de>]

https://openmeetings.apache.org/CallForLogo.html 

Dear All, 

I would like to get the discussion about the logos going a bit. In
general, I think the logos should be kept as simple as possible while at
the same time having a high recognition factor. 

Numbers 1, 5, 6, 8, 9 of the big and most of the square logos I like in
this respect. Also, matching pairs of large and square logos would be
good. 

Like some others, in my sketch I tried  to include the colors of the
Apache feather. This is quite good for corporate identity, although a
blue/yellow version might look good, too. I tried to show the "openness"
of OpenMeetings through the transparency of the circles and the
"meeting" through the overlapping circles. 

Apart from my own suggestion, I really like the current logo by Denis
Kandrov. However, for the square version, one might find something with
more similarity to the big version. 

What do you think? 

Many greetings,
Thomas 

@Maxim Thanks for uploading my corrected logo

Re: Call for Logo

[in...@bureau-de-poste.net]

  Hello,

If we're voting, I like:

1, then 9, for the full logo, and 1 only for the square logo. I don't  
like anything else at all.

Best regards,

ed

Quoting Thomas Scholzen <ts...@buche17.de>:

> https://openmeetings.apache.org/CallForLogo.html
>
>   Dear All,
>
>   I would like to get the discussion about the logos going a bit. In  
> general, I think the logos should be kept as simple as possible  
> while at the same time having a high recognition factor.
>
>   Numbers 1, 5, 6, 8, 9 of the big and most of the square logos I  
> like in this respect. Also, matching pairs of large and square logos  
> would be good.
>
>   Like some others, in my sketch I tried  to include the colors of  
> the Apache feather. This is quite good for corporate identity,  
> although a blue/yellow version might look good, too. I tried to show  
> the “openness” of OpenMeetings through the transparency of the  
> circles and the “meeting” through the overlapping circles.
>
>   Apart from my own suggestion, I really like the current logo by  
> Denis Kandrov. However, for the square version, one might find  
> something with more similarity to the big version.
>
>    
>
>   What do you think?
>
>    
>
>   Many greetings,
> Thomas
>
>   @Maxim Thanks for uploading my corrected logo