You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Florian Pinel <pi...@us.ibm.com> on 2010/08/06 16:52:15 UTC
Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5
Some people in my team would like to use the Eclipse OCL parser to
evaluate expressions on SDO objects, but the OCL parser requires EMF 2.5.
We've started migrating Tuscany SDO to that version and should be able to
pass all the JUnit tests soon. Would it be OK to make an SDO release with
EMF 2.5?
--
Florian Pinel
Re: Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5
Posted by Florian Pinel <pi...@us.ibm.com>.
Done:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3679
--
Florian Pinel
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Tie line: 863-7346
Ext. phone: 914-784-7346
ant elder <an...@gmail.com>
09/15/2010 04:04 PM
Please respond to
dev@tuscany.apache.org
To
dev@tuscany.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5
OK nice work, if you raise a jira [1] and attach the workspace as a zip we
can look at getting it committed into a branch and even out in a release.
If multiple people have worked on it their names need to be made clear in
the jira, if there are significantly large code changes we may need to get
a code grant for the code but lets consider that once we can see the size
of the changes, probably its not so large and we can just create the
branch directly.
...ant
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Florian Pinel <pi...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
Thanks to Elio Damaggio's help, we now have a workspace with SDO and EMF
2.5 that passes all the unit tests.
Back in early August we were talking about starting a new branch. Can
someone let me know how to proceed?
Ant, Elio told me that it would be extremely hard, if at all possible, to
have SDO work with both old and new EMF versions.
Thanks!
--
Florian Pinel
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Tie line: 863-7346
Ext. phone: 914-784-7346
ant elder <an...@gmail.com>
08/07/2010 03:08 AM
Please respond to
dev@tuscany.apache.org
To
dev@tuscany.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5
Wouldn't it be possible to have the existing trunk code work with both
old and newer EMF versions? I can't find emf 2.5 in a maven repo to
try (does anyone know of one?) but trying to make sdo tolerant of
different emf versions seems like a user friendly approach.
...ant
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, kelvin goodson <ke...@apache.org>
wrote:
> sure, I was just giving the background for why we are where we are,
> I'd be pleased to see the code advanced again
>
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Cannot we start a new branch to make such upgrade? Potentially, we can
also
>> implement the OASIS SDO 3.0 spec in Tuscany.
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> Raymond Feng
>> rfeng@apache.org
>> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org
>> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
>> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:20 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
>>
>> The reason why we are stuck at such a back level of EMF is that SDO
>> java 2.1 spec requires support for java 1.4, and the EMF version we
>> rely upon was the last EMF version that didn't use java generics
>> introduced in java 5.
>>
>> Kelvin.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Florian Pinel <pi...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Some people in my team would like to use the Eclipse OCL parser to
evaluate
>>
>> expressions on SDO objects, but the OCL parser requires EMF 2.5. We've
>>
>> started migrating Tuscany SDO to that version and should be able to
pass all
>>
>> the JUnit tests soon. Would it be OK to make an SDO release with EMF
2.5?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Florian Pinel
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
OK nice work, if you raise a jira [1] and attach the workspace as a zip we
can look at getting it committed into a branch and even out in a release. If
multiple people have worked on it their names need to be made clear in the
jira, if there are significantly large code changes we may need to get a
code grant for the code but lets consider that once we can see the size of
the changes, probably its not so large and we can just create the branch
directly.
...ant
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Florian Pinel <pi...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks to Elio Damaggio's help, we now have a workspace with SDO and EMF
> 2.5 that passes all the unit tests.
> Back in early August we were talking about starting a new branch. Can
> someone let me know how to proceed?
> Ant, Elio told me that it would be extremely hard, if at all possible, to
> have SDO work with both old and new EMF versions.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Florian Pinel
> IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
> Tie line: 863-7346
> Ext. phone: 914-784-7346
>
>
>
> *ant elder <an...@gmail.com>*
>
> 08/07/2010 03:08 AM
> Please respond to
> dev@tuscany.apache.org
>
> To
> dev@tuscany.apache.org
> cc
> Subject
> Re: Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5
>
>
>
>
> Wouldn't it be possible to have the existing trunk code work with both
> old and newer EMF versions? I can't find emf 2.5 in a maven repo to
> try (does anyone know of one?) but trying to make sdo tolerant of
> different emf versions seems like a user friendly approach.
>
> ...ant
>
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, kelvin goodson <ke...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > sure, I was just giving the background for why we are where we are,
> > I'd be pleased to see the code advanced again
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Cannot we start a new branch to make such upgrade? Potentially, we can
> also
> >> implement the OASIS SDO 3.0 spec in Tuscany.
> >> Thanks,
> >> Raymond
> >> ________________________________________________________________
> >> Raymond Feng
> >> rfeng@apache.org
> >> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org
> >> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
> >> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com
> >> ________________________________________________________________
> >> On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:20 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
> >>
> >> The reason why we are stuck at such a back level of EMF is that SDO
> >> java 2.1 spec requires support for java 1.4, and the EMF version we
> >> rely upon was the last EMF version that didn't use java generics
> >> introduced in java 5.
> >>
> >> Kelvin.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Florian Pinel <pi...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Some people in my team would like to use the Eclipse OCL parser to
> evaluate
> >>
> >> expressions on SDO objects, but the OCL parser requires EMF 2.5. We've
> >>
> >> started migrating Tuscany SDO to that version and should be able to pass
> all
> >>
> >> the JUnit tests soon. Would it be OK to make an SDO release with EMF
> 2.5?
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Florian Pinel
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5
Posted by Florian Pinel <pi...@us.ibm.com>.
Thanks to Elio Damaggio's help, we now have a workspace with SDO and EMF
2.5 that passes all the unit tests.
Back in early August we were talking about starting a new branch. Can
someone let me know how to proceed?
Ant, Elio told me that it would be extremely hard, if at all possible, to
have SDO work with both old and new EMF versions.
Thanks!
--
Florian Pinel
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Tie line: 863-7346
Ext. phone: 914-784-7346
ant elder <an...@gmail.com>
08/07/2010 03:08 AM
Please respond to
dev@tuscany.apache.org
To
dev@tuscany.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5
Wouldn't it be possible to have the existing trunk code work with both
old and newer EMF versions? I can't find emf 2.5 in a maven repo to
try (does anyone know of one?) but trying to make sdo tolerant of
different emf versions seems like a user friendly approach.
...ant
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, kelvin goodson <ke...@apache.org>
wrote:
> sure, I was just giving the background for why we are where we are,
> I'd be pleased to see the code advanced again
>
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Cannot we start a new branch to make such upgrade? Potentially, we can
also
>> implement the OASIS SDO 3.0 spec in Tuscany.
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> Raymond Feng
>> rfeng@apache.org
>> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org
>> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
>> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:20 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
>>
>> The reason why we are stuck at such a back level of EMF is that SDO
>> java 2.1 spec requires support for java 1.4, and the EMF version we
>> rely upon was the last EMF version that didn't use java generics
>> introduced in java 5.
>>
>> Kelvin.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Florian Pinel <pi...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Some people in my team would like to use the Eclipse OCL parser to
evaluate
>>
>> expressions on SDO objects, but the OCL parser requires EMF 2.5. We've
>>
>> started migrating Tuscany SDO to that version and should be able to
pass all
>>
>> the JUnit tests soon. Would it be OK to make an SDO release with EMF
2.5?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Florian Pinel
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Wouldn't it be possible to have the existing trunk code work with both
old and newer EMF versions? I can't find emf 2.5 in a maven repo to
try (does anyone know of one?) but trying to make sdo tolerant of
different emf versions seems like a user friendly approach.
...ant
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, kelvin goodson <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
> sure, I was just giving the background for why we are where we are,
> I'd be pleased to see the code advanced again
>
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Cannot we start a new branch to make such upgrade? Potentially, we can also
>> implement the OASIS SDO 3.0 spec in Tuscany.
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> Raymond Feng
>> rfeng@apache.org
>> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org
>> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
>> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:20 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
>>
>> The reason why we are stuck at such a back level of EMF is that SDO
>> java 2.1 spec requires support for java 1.4, and the EMF version we
>> rely upon was the last EMF version that didn't use java generics
>> introduced in java 5.
>>
>> Kelvin.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Florian Pinel <pi...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Some people in my team would like to use the Eclipse OCL parser to evaluate
>>
>> expressions on SDO objects, but the OCL parser requires EMF 2.5. We've
>>
>> started migrating Tuscany SDO to that version and should be able to pass all
>>
>> the JUnit tests soon. Would it be OK to make an SDO release with EMF 2.5?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Florian Pinel
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@apache.org>.
sure, I was just giving the background for why we are where we are,
I'd be pleased to see the code advanced again
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cannot we start a new branch to make such upgrade? Potentially, we can also
> implement the OASIS SDO 3.0 spec in Tuscany.
> Thanks,
> Raymond
> ________________________________________________________________
> Raymond Feng
> rfeng@apache.org
> Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org
> Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
> Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com
> ________________________________________________________________
> On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:20 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
>
> The reason why we are stuck at such a back level of EMF is that SDO
> java 2.1 spec requires support for java 1.4, and the EMF version we
> rely upon was the last EMF version that didn't use java generics
> introduced in java 5.
>
> Kelvin.
>
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Florian Pinel <pi...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Some people in my team would like to use the Eclipse OCL parser to evaluate
>
> expressions on SDO objects, but the OCL parser requires EMF 2.5. We've
>
> started migrating Tuscany SDO to that version and should be able to pass all
>
> the JUnit tests soon. Would it be OK to make an SDO release with EMF 2.5?
>
> --
>
> Florian Pinel
>
>
>
Re: Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Cannot we start a new branch to make such upgrade? Potentially, we can also implement the OASIS SDO 3.0 spec in Tuscany.
Thanks,
Raymond
________________________________________________________________
Raymond Feng
rfeng@apache.org
Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com
________________________________________________________________
On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:20 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
> The reason why we are stuck at such a back level of EMF is that SDO
> java 2.1 spec requires support for java 1.4, and the EMF version we
> rely upon was the last EMF version that didn't use java generics
> introduced in java 5.
>
> Kelvin.
>
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Florian Pinel <pi...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Some people in my team would like to use the Eclipse OCL parser to evaluate
>> expressions on SDO objects, but the OCL parser requires EMF 2.5. We've
>> started migrating Tuscany SDO to that version and should be able to pass all
>> the JUnit tests soon. Would it be OK to make an SDO release with EMF 2.5?
>>
>> --
>> Florian Pinel
>>
Re: Upgrading Tuscany SDO to EMF 2.5
Posted by kelvin goodson <ke...@apache.org>.
The reason why we are stuck at such a back level of EMF is that SDO
java 2.1 spec requires support for java 1.4, and the EMF version we
rely upon was the last EMF version that didn't use java generics
introduced in java 5.
Kelvin.
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Florian Pinel <pi...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Some people in my team would like to use the Eclipse OCL parser to evaluate
> expressions on SDO objects, but the OCL parser requires EMF 2.5. We've
> started migrating Tuscany SDO to that version and should be able to pass all
> the JUnit tests soon. Would it be OK to make an SDO release with EMF 2.5?
>
> --
> Florian Pinel
>