[ANN][VOTE] Release Apache Qpid M2.1

[Aidan Skinner <ai...@apache.org>]

All,

I have cut, signed, built, smoke tested and uploaded Qpid M2.1 RC2,
which I believe to be ready for prime time.

As before, release notes are located here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310520&styleName=Html&version=12312720
and known issues here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310520&fixfor=12312720&resolution=-1&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC

I will work on a proper set of release notes in the next few days,
before we go to to incubator-general@

In the meantime, have at http://people.apache.org/~aidan/qpid-M2.1-RC2/

I'll close this vote after 2008-04-05 00:00Z if we have sufficient
+1's and no -1's

- Aidan

-- 
aim/y!:aidans42 g:aidan.skinner@gmail.com
http://aidan.skinner.me.uk/
"We belong to nobody and nobody belongs to us. We don't even belong to
each other."

Re: [ANN][VOTE] Release Apache Qpid M2.1

[Aidan Skinner <ai...@apache.org>]

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Marnie McCormack
<ma...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Just having a look at the RC now .... thanks for building.

Thanks for taking the time to look over it!

> Couple of quick questions/notes (apologies for any bits that I just don't
> yet know about !). I notice that most of these things exist/are unchanged
> from M2, but not sure that means tat they're ok.
>
> 1. Release Notes - can we vote on RC1 when we know it'll change to include
> the 2.1 rel notes ?

We dont' ship the release notes as part of the artifacts, they're
seperate. The vote is on the RC2 source and binarie artificats.

> 2. /etc - whats the .jpp file for ?

it's the configuration file for jpackage, it's been there sicne Dec 2006

> 3. /bin - Whats the ibm jar for ?

It's a required library for the management stuff.

> 4. Licenses - in M1 we included (correctly I think ?) the licenses for all
> included jars. In M2+ we seem to have lost these from the bin dist (haven't
> looked in the src dist). I don't *think* this is correct, since we are
> distributing them thus I think they are needed ?

These are all collected in NOTICE and LICENCE in the top level now.

>  5. Have you run RAT etc ? Think it might help us perform some license
> checking automatically.

Yep, it passed cleanly (after I added a few missing headers in
r643153). I'll upload a tar with the rat reports when I get somewhere
with ssh access.

HAND,

- Aidan
-- 
aim/y!:aidans42 g:aidan.skinner@gmail.com
http://aidan.skinner.me.uk/
"We belong to nobody and nobody belongs to us. We don't even belong to
each other."

Re: [ANN][VOTE] Release Apache Qpid M2.1

[Robert Godfrey <ro...@gmail.com>]

OK - a +1 from me

-- Rob

On 02/04/2008, Aidan Skinner <ai...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>  >  The src tars seem to contain .svn directories; would be nicer to leave
>  > those out. Otherwise it looks good to me. I've started the java and c++
>  > brokers, run python and ruby tests against each (0-9.no-wip for c++, 0-8 and
>  > 0-9.no-wip for java), the output for the ruby channel close test is a little
>  > noisy but it doesn't fail. Also ran a couple of the c++ test clients against
>  > both brokers.
>
>
> Cool,. thanks. If I have to rebuild them for any reason I'll make sure
>  to --exclude from the tar.
>
>
>  - Aidan
>  --
>  aim/y!:aidans42 g:aidan.skinner@gmail.com
>  http://aidan.skinner.me.uk/
>  "We belong to nobody and nobody belongs to us. We don't even belong to
>  each other."
>

Re: [ANN][VOTE] Release Apache Qpid M2.1

[Aidan Skinner <ai...@apache.org>]

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com> wrote:

>  The src tars seem to contain .svn directories; would be nicer to leave
> those out. Otherwise it looks good to me. I've started the java and c++
> brokers, run python and ruby tests against each (0-9.no-wip for c++, 0-8 and
> 0-9.no-wip for java), the output for the ruby channel close test is a little
> noisy but it doesn't fail. Also ran a couple of the c++ test clients against
> both brokers.

Cool,. thanks. If I have to rebuild them for any reason I'll make sure
to --exclude from the tar.

- Aidan
-- 
aim/y!:aidans42 g:aidan.skinner@gmail.com
http://aidan.skinner.me.uk/
"We belong to nobody and nobody belongs to us. We don't even belong to
each other."

Re: [ANN][VOTE] Release Apache Qpid M2.1

[Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>]

Aidan Skinner wrote:
> In the meantime, have at http://people.apache.org/~aidan/qpid-M2.1-RC2/

The src tars seem to contain .svn directories; would be nicer to leave 
those out. Otherwise it looks good to me. I've started the java and c++ 
brokers, run python and ruby tests against each (0-9.no-wip for c++, 0-8 
and 0-9.no-wip for java), the output for the ruby channel close test is 
a little noisy but it doesn't fail. Also ran a couple of the c++ test 
clients against both brokers.