You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@avalon.apache.org by Mark Woon <mo...@SMI.Stanford.EDU> on 2002/02/27 02:59:08 UTC
D[ij|ji]straSemaphore
Peter Donald wrote:
> > BTW, it looks like a typo got commited: there's a
> > DjikstraSemaphore.java and a DijkstraSemaphore.java in
> > org.apache.avalon.excalibur.concurrent (dJI vs. dIJ).
> >
> > The thought just occurred to me that it's still there because of
> > backwards compatibility and someone is actually using
> > DijkstraSemaphore... ;)
>
> Yep thats the reason ;)
In that case, shouldn't DijkstraSemaphore be deprecated?
-Mark
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: D[ij|ji]straSemaphore
Posted by Rolf Veen <ro...@helide.com>.
Mark Woon wrote:
> In that case, shouldn't DijkstraSemaphore be deprecated?
Maybe Mr. Dijkstra would deprecate DjikstraSemaphore
instead.
:-) Rolf.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: D[ij|ji]straSemaphore
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>.
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:59, Mark Woon wrote:
> Peter Donald wrote:
> > > BTW, it looks like a typo got commited: there's a
> > > DjikstraSemaphore.java and a DijkstraSemaphore.java in
> > > org.apache.avalon.excalibur.concurrent (dJI vs. dIJ).
> > >
> > > The thought just occurred to me that it's still there because of
> > > backwards compatibility and someone is actually using
> > > DijkstraSemaphore... ;)
> >
> > Yep thats the reason ;)
>
> In that case, shouldn't DijkstraSemaphore be deprecated?
probably - want to send a patch ? :)
--
Cheers,
Pete
-------------------------------------------------------
"I would like to take you seriously but to do so would
affront your intelligence" -William F. Buckley, JR
-------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>