You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/01/07 07:51:40 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14842) PrefixTree write path should work with BytebufferedCells (during compaction)

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15086936#comment-15086936 ] 

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-14842:
------------------------------------------------

If we need Offheap cells to work here then ByteRanges has to be replaced with ByteBuffers throught out. And allow even the onheap cells to work with ByteBuffers instead of ByteRanges. We can instead replace with ByteBuffs and create SinlgeByteBuff or MultiByteBuff based on the cell's component. Suggestions?  Can we defer this JIRA as 'later' once we decide on the ByteRanges and its usages?

> PrefixTree write path should work with BytebufferedCells (during compaction)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14842
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14842
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: regionserver, Scanners
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>
> This is again related to HBASE-14832 where any Prefix Tree cell during compaction should work with BBCells. For now changing the value/tag part alone is enough since only the value/tag is going to be offheap and all others are going to be onheap.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)