Which version?

[Lon Varscsak <lo...@gmail.com>]

Hey guys,

It's been a while since I've used Cayenne and tinkering with a new project.
 Should I be using 3.2M1 (June 2013) or 3.1RC1 (Feb 2014) for a new project?

-Lon

Re: Which version?

[Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>]

Fixed per CAY-1881. 3.2 fix is still not released, but the Modeler can be assembled from sources.

Andrus

On Aug 7, 2014, at 7:47 PM, Lon Varscsak <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Okay, cool.  I think that's what I used before.  I come from the land of
> WebObjects/EOF/WOnder and I think 3.2 had some goodness that makes me feel
> more at home. :P
> 
> It looks like 3.2's version of Modeler for OSX isn't running with Java 7
> because I get a major.minor error when trying to use jtds.  I'm running the
> plain java version with no issues (other than it looks like a java app :D).
> 
> -Lon
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Let’s start a vote on dev then :)
>> 
>> On Aug 7, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> I'd like to see 3.1 made final soon.  We aren't allowed to use Beta or
>>> Release Candidate versions for our production deployments.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Yeah, 3.2 has definitely moved ahead of 3.1 a lot. Tons of new great
>>>> stuff. And we should make 3.2M2 rather soon - it has even more of it.
>>>> 
>>>> Having said that, 3.1 is super stable. The next release of 3.1 will
>>>> hopefully be a “final”. For some it may be a benefit. If you go this
>> way,
>>>> use RC1 of course, which is the latest on the 3.1 branch.
>>>> 
>>>> Andrus
>>>> 
>>>> On Aug 7, 2014, at 4:54 AM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 3.2!
>>>>> On Aug 6, 2014 7:12 PM, "Lon Varscsak" <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It's been a while since I've used Cayenne and tinkering with a new
>>>> project.
>>>>>> Should I be using 3.2M1 (June 2013) or 3.1RC1 (Feb 2014) for a new
>>>>>> project?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Lon
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Re: Which version?

[Lon Varscsak <lo...@gmail.com>]

Okay, cool.  I think that's what I used before.  I come from the land of
WebObjects/EOF/WOnder and I think 3.2 had some goodness that makes me feel
more at home. :P

It looks like 3.2's version of Modeler for OSX isn't running with Java 7
because I get a major.minor error when trying to use jtds.  I'm running the
plain java version with no issues (other than it looks like a java app :D).

-Lon


On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
wrote:

> Let’s start a vote on dev then :)
>
> On Aug 7, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to see 3.1 made final soon.  We aren't allowed to use Beta or
> > Release Candidate versions for our production deployments.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Yeah, 3.2 has definitely moved ahead of 3.1 a lot. Tons of new great
> >> stuff. And we should make 3.2M2 rather soon - it has even more of it.
> >>
> >> Having said that, 3.1 is super stable. The next release of 3.1 will
> >> hopefully be a “final”. For some it may be a benefit. If you go this
> way,
> >> use RC1 of course, which is the latest on the 3.1 branch.
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >> On Aug 7, 2014, at 4:54 AM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> 3.2!
> >>> On Aug 6, 2014 7:12 PM, "Lon Varscsak" <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hey guys,
> >>>>
> >>>> It's been a while since I've used Cayenne and tinkering with a new
> >> project.
> >>>> Should I be using 3.2M1 (June 2013) or 3.1RC1 (Feb 2014) for a new
> >>>> project?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Lon
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Re: Which version?

[Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>]

Let’s start a vote on dev then :)

On Aug 7, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net> wrote:

> I'd like to see 3.1 made final soon.  We aren't allowed to use Beta or
> Release Candidate versions for our production deployments.
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, 3.2 has definitely moved ahead of 3.1 a lot. Tons of new great
>> stuff. And we should make 3.2M2 rather soon - it has even more of it.
>> 
>> Having said that, 3.1 is super stable. The next release of 3.1 will
>> hopefully be a “final”. For some it may be a benefit. If you go this way,
>> use RC1 of course, which is the latest on the 3.1 branch.
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> On Aug 7, 2014, at 4:54 AM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> 3.2!
>>> On Aug 6, 2014 7:12 PM, "Lon Varscsak" <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hey guys,
>>>> 
>>>> It's been a while since I've used Cayenne and tinkering with a new
>> project.
>>>> Should I be using 3.2M1 (June 2013) or 3.1RC1 (Feb 2014) for a new
>>>> project?
>>>> 
>>>> -Lon
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Re: Which version?

[Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>]

I'd like to see 3.1 made final soon.  We aren't allowed to use Beta or
Release Candidate versions for our production deployments.



On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
wrote:

> Yeah, 3.2 has definitely moved ahead of 3.1 a lot. Tons of new great
> stuff. And we should make 3.2M2 rather soon - it has even more of it.
>
> Having said that, 3.1 is super stable. The next release of 3.1 will
> hopefully be a “final”. For some it may be a benefit. If you go this way,
> use RC1 of course, which is the latest on the 3.1 branch.
>
> Andrus
>
> On Aug 7, 2014, at 4:54 AM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 3.2!
> > On Aug 6, 2014 7:12 PM, "Lon Varscsak" <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> It's been a while since I've used Cayenne and tinkering with a new
> project.
> >> Should I be using 3.2M1 (June 2013) or 3.1RC1 (Feb 2014) for a new
> >> project?
> >>
> >> -Lon
> >>
>
>

Re: Which version?

[Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>]

Yeah, 3.2 has definitely moved ahead of 3.1 a lot. Tons of new great stuff. And we should make 3.2M2 rather soon - it has even more of it.

Having said that, 3.1 is super stable. The next release of 3.1 will hopefully be a “final”. For some it may be a benefit. If you go this way, use RC1 of course, which is the latest on the 3.1 branch.

Andrus

On Aug 7, 2014, at 4:54 AM, John Huss <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 3.2!
> On Aug 6, 2014 7:12 PM, "Lon Varscsak" <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hey guys,
>> 
>> It's been a while since I've used Cayenne and tinkering with a new project.
>> Should I be using 3.2M1 (June 2013) or 3.1RC1 (Feb 2014) for a new
>> project?
>> 
>> -Lon
>> 

Re: Which version?

[John Huss <jo...@gmail.com>]

3.2!
On Aug 6, 2014 7:12 PM, "Lon Varscsak" <lo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey guys,
>
> It's been a while since I've used Cayenne and tinkering with a new project.
>  Should I be using 3.2M1 (June 2013) or 3.1RC1 (Feb 2014) for a new
> project?
>
> -Lon
>