Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.x stream

[Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>]

As you guys have seen, my work now arrived on master.

Any further improvements now won't break any compatibility or anything.

After this I think it's time to put something out and keep working on
master as usual.

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Clebert Suconic
<cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> although maybe giving this power to the user may change certain
> semantics? things that are supposed to run fast could eventually take
> much longer.
>
>
> But the user would be in control.
>
>
> Dunno, that's splitting the conversation on the 2.x discussion already.
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Clebert Suconic
> <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The two properties are pretty straight-forward, and I personally don't see how making them use the same time unit makes things simpler.  Granting such
>>
>> you're right.. I was just trying to understand Jiri's comment, and not
>> actually make an evaluation on the feature.
>>
>> <idea> If we were to make any changes, I would change all properties
>> that refer to time to also include the time unit on them. That way the
>> user would be more free to make any changes. </idea>
>>
>>
>>
>> Example: <timeout>5s</timeout>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Just an idea though!
>>
>>
>>
>> If not, I would keep it as is... as it wouldn't bring much value otherwise.
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.x stream

[Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>]

Franz,

Contributions to documentation is always welcomed :).  A scan of the
persistence layer and journal docs would be really useful.  Thanks

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:30 PM, nigro_franz <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:

> An awesome work Clebert!
> And to everyone that has made this master filled of such great stuff :)
> Martyn, do u need an hand on the doc?
> In particular the journal type part is something that I was pretty involved
> :P
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/DISCUSS-ActiveMQ-Artemis-2-x-stream-tp4721815p4723170.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.x stream

[nigro_franz <ni...@gmail.com>]

Thanks Clebert!!!
Yes and I'll ask if makes sense to add something about the datasync option
too 



--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-ActiveMQ-Artemis-2-x-stream-tp4721815p4723306.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.x stream

[nigro_franz <ni...@gmail.com>]

Cool 

eheheh get some rest mate!!! :)



--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-ActiveMQ-Artemis-2-x-stream-tp4721815p4723175.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.x stream

[Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>]

Adding mmap journal to the docs is a great idea.


Also make sure the configs are current on the docs.


I won't do any work today (beyond this email :) )



Will help out tomorrow.



On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 7:36 AM nigro_franz <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:

> An awesome work Clebert!
> And to everyone that has made this master filled of such great stuff :)
> Martyn, do u need an hand on the doc?
> In particular the journal type part is something that I was pretty involved
> :P
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-ActiveMQ-Artemis-2-x-stream-tp4721815p4723170.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.x stream

[nigro_franz <ni...@gmail.com>]

An awesome work Clebert!
And to everyone that has made this master filled of such great stuff :)
Martyn, do u need an hand on the doc? 
In particular the journal type part is something that I was pretty involved
:P




--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-ActiveMQ-Artemis-2-x-stream-tp4721815p4723170.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.x stream

[Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>]

Great work Clebert.  I know this was a long hard slog.  I'm going to send a
2.0.0 HEADSUP later today.  I'm really excited to get all the great stuff
we've been doing on master into the hands of users.

I think now is a good time to revisit our documentation and examples to
ensure everything is up to date.  I'm going to spend some time on this
today and tomorrow.

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> As you guys have seen, my work now arrived on master.
>
> Any further improvements now won't break any compatibility or anything.
>
> After this I think it's time to put something out and keep working on
> master as usual.
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Clebert Suconic
> <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > although maybe giving this power to the user may change certain
> > semantics? things that are supposed to run fast could eventually take
> > much longer.
> >
> >
> > But the user would be in control.
> >
> >
> > Dunno, that's splitting the conversation on the 2.x discussion already.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Clebert Suconic
> > <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> The two properties are pretty straight-forward, and I personally don't
> see how making them use the same time unit makes things simpler.  Granting
> such
> >>
> >> you're right.. I was just trying to understand Jiri's comment, and not
> >> actually make an evaluation on the feature.
> >>
> >> <idea> If we were to make any changes, I would change all properties
> >> that refer to time to also include the time unit on them. That way the
> >> user would be more free to make any changes. </idea>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Example: <timeout>5s</timeout>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Just an idea though!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> If not, I would keep it as is... as it wouldn't bring much value
> otherwise.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>