You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com> on 2010/10/21 15:37:50 UTC
OWB Release Lifecycle
Hi;
OpenEJB has been discussing release lifecycle! I think we can also discuss it
for OWB. What do you think about the release cycle for OWB?
From my perspective, - 4 - release in one year is fantastico! But we also think
about maintenance releases!
Thanks;
Gurkan
Re: OWB Release Lifecycle
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Major releases will be done if the spec changes. So an owb-2.xx will only be done if a 2.0 Spec will be released. Otherwise I'd say we don't need a really fixed set of releases. I guess with all the work which runs into the geronimo integration currently, we will do another release next month or so ;)
But yes, +1 for doing 4 releases minimum per year if there has been enough work done.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 10/22/10, Paul J. Reder <re...@remulak.net> wrote:
> From: Paul J. Reder <re...@remulak.net>
> Subject: Re: OWB Release Lifecycle
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Date: Friday, October 22, 2010, 12:46 AM
> Or *really* minor (bug fix releases)
> like 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3, etc.
>
> So I see the options as being some number (4 was mentioned
> and sounds reasonable to
> me) of releases of the following (type) possibilities:
>
> 1. X.0.0 (Major version releases)
> 2. 0.X.0 (Minor releases)
> 3. 0.0.X (Minor maintenance releases)
>
> I think multiple type (1) releases would be too aggressive
> and disruptive.
> I think all four being type (3) releases is too low a bar.
> So I'd vote for 4 releases per year that targets at most
> one type (1) and three type
> (3) releases and between zero and four type (2) releases.
>
> Or do we consider type (3) to be so minor as to be
> uncounted?
> (so total of 4 where: ((type (1) <= 1)
> and (0 <= type (2) <= 4)))
>
> Paul J. Reder
>
> On 10/21/2010 08:16 PM, Rohit Kelapure wrote:
> > Does 4 releases mean four major releases like
> 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 3.0.0 or minor
> > ones like 1.1.0, 1.2.0 et al
> >
> > --Thanks,
> > Rohit
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu<gu...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Hi;
> >>
> >> OpenEJB has been discussing release lifecycle! I
> think we can also discuss
> >> it
> >> for OWB. What do you think about the release cycle
> for OWB?
> >>
> >>
> >> From my perspective, - 4 - release in
> one year is fantastico! But we also
> >> think
> >> about maintenance releases!
> >>
> >> Thanks;
> >>
> >> Gurkan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Paul J. Reder
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> "The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the
> determination of each
> citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen
> feels duty bound to do
> his share in this defense are the constitutional rights
> secure."
> -- Albert Einstein
>
>
Re: OWB Release Lifecycle
Posted by "Paul J. Reder" <re...@remulak.net>.
Or *really* minor (bug fix releases) like 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3, etc.
So I see the options as being some number (4 was mentioned and sounds reasonable to
me) of releases of the following (type) possibilities:
1. X.0.0 (Major version releases)
2. 0.X.0 (Minor releases)
3. 0.0.X (Minor maintenance releases)
I think multiple type (1) releases would be too aggressive and disruptive.
I think all four being type (3) releases is too low a bar.
So I'd vote for 4 releases per year that targets at most one type (1) and three type
(3) releases and between zero and four type (2) releases.
Or do we consider type (3) to be so minor as to be uncounted?
(so total of 4 where: ((type (1) <= 1) and (0 <= type (2) <= 4)))
Paul J. Reder
On 10/21/2010 08:16 PM, Rohit Kelapure wrote:
> Does 4 releases mean four major releases like 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 3.0.0 or minor
> ones like 1.1.0, 1.2.0 et al
>
> --Thanks,
> Rohit
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu<gu...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi;
>>
>> OpenEJB has been discussing release lifecycle! I think we can also discuss
>> it
>> for OWB. What do you think about the release cycle for OWB?
>>
>>
>> From my perspective, - 4 - release in one year is fantastico! But we also
>> think
>> about maintenance releases!
>>
>> Thanks;
>>
>> Gurkan
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Paul J. Reder
-----------------------------------------------------------
"The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each
citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do
his share in this defense are the constitutional rights secure."
-- Albert Einstein
Re: OWB Release Lifecycle
Posted by Rohit Kelapure <ke...@gmail.com>.
Does 4 releases mean four major releases like 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 3.0.0 or minor
ones like 1.1.0, 1.2.0 et al
--Thanks,
Rohit
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> Hi;
>
> OpenEJB has been discussing release lifecycle! I think we can also discuss
> it
> for OWB. What do you think about the release cycle for OWB?
>
>
> From my perspective, - 4 - release in one year is fantastico! But we also
> think
> about maintenance releases!
>
> Thanks;
>
> Gurkan
>
>
>
Re: OWB Release Lifecycle
Posted by Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>.
Yes, 4 sounds great!
+1 from me too.
Regards,
Jakob
2010/10/21 Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
> 2010/10/21 Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
>
>> Hi;
>>
>> OpenEJB has been discussing release lifecycle! I think we can also discuss
>> it
>> for OWB. What do you think about the release cycle for OWB?
>>
>>
>> From my perspective, - 4 - release in one year is fantastico! But we also
>> think
>> about maintenance releases!
>>
>> Thanks;
>>
>> Gurkan
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Jakob Korherr
blog: http://www.jakobk.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
work: http://www.irian.at
Re: OWB Release Lifecycle
Posted by Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com>.
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2010/10/21 Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>
> Hi;
>
> OpenEJB has been discussing release lifecycle! I think we can also discuss
> it
> for OWB. What do you think about the release cycle for OWB?
>
>
> From my perspective, - 4 - release in one year is fantastico! But we also
> think
> about maintenance releases!
>
> Thanks;
>
> Gurkan
>
>
>