You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Bennet Schulz <ma...@bennet-schulz.de> on 2016/10/31 15:50:15 UTC
ActiveMQ Artemis - Replacing Airline CLI?
Hi there,
I just took a look at the airline project on github: https://github.com/airlift/airline <https://github.com/airlift/airline> and it seems to be dead. The last commit was in October the 11th in 2015 and there are lots of open and unanswered pull requests and issues.
Is it a good idea to stay with airline for future releases or should be think about replacing it with another CLI lib?
best,
Bennet
Re: ActiveMQ Artemis - Replacing Airline CLI?
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
> I would like to have some of the open issues of airline in our cli
Like what?
We have any issues we opened against airline?
Re: ActiveMQ Artemis - Replacing Airline CLI?
Posted by Bennet Schulz <ma...@bennet-schulz.de>.
Well.. let’s stay with airline if you don’t see any upcoming problems with the dead looking airline project.
I would like to have some of the open issues of airline in our cli, but it’s more a nice to have and no showstopper.
> On 31 Oct 2016, at 20:51, Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> it would need some heavy refactoring... it's not a direct replacement.
>
> Airline supports commands and parameters...
>
> That way you can add a bunch of classes, and airline could figure out between:
>
> ./artemis data
> ./artemis run...
>
> etc...
>
> JComander from what I just looked it only supports the parameters.
>
>
> Airline is apache license, if the project becomes abandonware we could
> fork it and add it to our modules. It's pretty small anyways.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Christopher Shannon
> <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> JCommander would be a good alternative but not sure we'd gain much by
>> switching if airline works for now.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> It's something simple that does the job we need.. but if anyone have
>>> any suggestion?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Bennet Schulz <ma...@bennet-schulz.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi there,
>>>>
>>>> I just took a look at the airline project on github:
>>> https://github.com/airlift/airline <https://github.com/airlift/airline>
>>> and it seems to be dead. The last commit was in October the 11th in 2015
>>> and there are lots of open and unanswered pull requests and issues.
>>>> Is it a good idea to stay with airline for future releases or should be
>>> think about replacing it with another CLI lib?
>>>>
>>>> best,
>>>> Bennet
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
Re: ActiveMQ Artemis - Replacing Airline CLI?
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
it would need some heavy refactoring... it's not a direct replacement.
Airline supports commands and parameters...
That way you can add a bunch of classes, and airline could figure out between:
./artemis data
./artemis run...
etc...
JComander from what I just looked it only supports the parameters.
Airline is apache license, if the project becomes abandonware we could
fork it and add it to our modules. It's pretty small anyways.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Christopher Shannon
<ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> JCommander would be a good alternative but not sure we'd gain much by
> switching if airline works for now.
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>> It's something simple that does the job we need.. but if anyone have
>> any suggestion?
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Bennet Schulz <ma...@bennet-schulz.de>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi there,
>> >
>> > I just took a look at the airline project on github:
>> https://github.com/airlift/airline <https://github.com/airlift/airline>
>> and it seems to be dead. The last commit was in October the 11th in 2015
>> and there are lots of open and unanswered pull requests and issues.
>> > Is it a good idea to stay with airline for future releases or should be
>> think about replacing it with another CLI lib?
>> >
>> > best,
>> > Bennet
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clebert Suconic
>>
--
Clebert Suconic
Re: ActiveMQ Artemis - Replacing Airline CLI?
Posted by Christopher Shannon <ch...@gmail.com>.
JCommander would be a good alternative but not sure we'd gain much by
switching if airline works for now.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com
> wrote:
> It's something simple that does the job we need.. but if anyone have
> any suggestion?
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Bennet Schulz <ma...@bennet-schulz.de>
> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I just took a look at the airline project on github:
> https://github.com/airlift/airline <https://github.com/airlift/airline>
> and it seems to be dead. The last commit was in October the 11th in 2015
> and there are lots of open and unanswered pull requests and issues.
> > Is it a good idea to stay with airline for future releases or should be
> think about replacing it with another CLI lib?
> >
> > best,
> > Bennet
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>
Re: ActiveMQ Artemis - Replacing Airline CLI?
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
It's something simple that does the job we need.. but if anyone have
any suggestion?
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Bennet Schulz <ma...@bennet-schulz.de> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I just took a look at the airline project on github: https://github.com/airlift/airline <https://github.com/airlift/airline> and it seems to be dead. The last commit was in October the 11th in 2015 and there are lots of open and unanswered pull requests and issues.
> Is it a good idea to stay with airline for future releases or should be think about replacing it with another CLI lib?
>
> best,
> Bennet
--
Clebert Suconic