You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@harmony.apache.org by "Gregory Shimansky (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/06/22 16:38:27 UTC

[jira] Closed: (HARMONY-3696) [drlvm][kernel] removing PolicyUtils & SecurityUtils from kernel classes is required

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Gregory Shimansky closed HARMONY-3696.
--------------------------------------


No response, assuming ok.

> [drlvm][kernel] removing PolicyUtils & SecurityUtils from kernel classes is required
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HARMONY-3696
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3696
>             Project: Harmony
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: DRLVM
>         Environment: any
>            Reporter: Vladimir Beliaev
>            Assignee: Gregory Shimansky
>         Attachments: H3696.patch, H3696.patch, H3696.sh
>
>
> Next pack of warnings (15) is produced by PolicyUtils.
> it turned out that PolicyUtils.java is already defined in classlib component (in different package). It differs from DRLVM version only in use of generics (classlib version does it correctly).
> There is another duplicated class - SecurityUtils.
> Both PolicyUtils & SecurityUtils do not seem to be really "kernel"
> - they do not have any VM specific native defined (no native at all)
> - they do not use kernel classes private API (like package private field of java/lang/Class for  example)
> So, I guess both duplication are to be removed ffrom kernel classes.
> Thanks
> Vladimir Beliaev

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.