You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tapestry.apache.org by Tina Umlandt <ti...@compuserve.de> on 2007/06/26 17:56:51 UTC
Messages and @inject
hi,
I need my own implementation of the Messages interface. It works fine with the new binding in the HTML-templates. But I
have a problem to use it as a field in a the class. I tried the following
@Inject
@Service ( "myMessages" )
Messages _message;
I hoped the Injection would know that I use my own implementation but it is totally ignored. The tapestry messages are
injected.
I created a little workaround by implementing a mock interface which extends the Messages interface so that the
injection work properly.
@Inject
MyMessages _message;
But I don't really like it that way.
The question that I have is:
Is this effect wanted that the user cannot inject his own Messages implementation or is it something nobody thought of?
Thanks and regards,
Tina
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Antwort: Messages and @inject
Posted by Tina Umlandt <ti...@compuserve.de>.
Well. now I know what you mean ;-)
This is the part my colleagues were doing so I missed this the previous
times :-(.
But thx a lot and yes, I think this is the right time to read the docs
again ...
Kristian Marinkovic wrote:
> before you inject a service you must tell the ioc container how to
> create it (in your AppModule). you can do this by using the
> ServiceBinder:
>
> public static void bind(ServiceBinder binder) {
> binder.bind(MyService.class,MyServiceImpl.class);
> }
>
> Or you can provide a builder method:
>
> public static Message buildMyMessage() {
> return new MyMessage();
> }
>
> there's some information in the tapestry-ioc docs :)
>
> g,
> kris
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Tina Umlandt <ti...@compuserve.de>
> 27.06.2007 13:50
> Bitte antworten an
> "Tapestry users" <us...@tapestry.apache.org>
>
>
> An
> Tapestry users <us...@tapestry.apache.org>
> Kopie
>
> Thema
> Re: Antwort: Messages and @inject
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hej,
>
> I didn't add anything to my AppModule. Do I have to? Which method do you
> mean?
>
> Thx,
> Tina
>
>
>
> Kristian Marinkovic wrote:
>
>> it should work as you've tried.... could you post the code from
>> your AppModule where you return your service?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Tina Umlandt <ti...@compuserve.de>
>> 26.06.2007 17:56
>> Bitte antworten an
>> "Tapestry users" <us...@tapestry.apache.org>
>>
>>
>> An
>> Tapestry users <us...@tapestry.apache.org>
>> Kopie
>>
>> Thema
>> Messages and @inject
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> I need my own implementation of the Messages interface. It works fine
>>
> with
>
>> the new binding in the HTML-templates. But I
>> have a problem to use it as a field in a the class. I tried the
>>
> following
>
>> @Inject
>> @Service ( "myMessages" )
>> Messages _message;
>>
>> I hoped the Injection would know that I use my own implementation but it
>>
>
>
>> is totally ignored. The tapestry messages are
>> injected.
>>
>> I created a little workaround by implementing a mock interface which
>> extends the Messages interface so that the
>> injection work properly.
>>
>> @Inject
>> MyMessages _message;
>>
>> But I don't really like it that way.
>>
>> The question that I have is:
>>
>> Is this effect wanted that the user cannot inject his own Messages
>> implementation or is it something nobody thought of?
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Tina
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Antwort: Messages and @inject
Posted by Kristian Marinkovic <kr...@porsche.co.at>.
before you inject a service you must tell the ioc container how to
create it (in your AppModule). you can do this by using the
ServiceBinder:
public static void bind(ServiceBinder binder) {
binder.bind(MyService.class,MyServiceImpl.class);
}
Or you can provide a builder method:
public static Message buildMyMessage() {
return new MyMessage();
}
there's some information in the tapestry-ioc docs :)
g,
kris
Tina Umlandt <ti...@compuserve.de>
27.06.2007 13:50
Bitte antworten an
"Tapestry users" <us...@tapestry.apache.org>
An
Tapestry users <us...@tapestry.apache.org>
Kopie
Thema
Re: Antwort: Messages and @inject
Hej,
I didn't add anything to my AppModule. Do I have to? Which method do you
mean?
Thx,
Tina
Kristian Marinkovic wrote:
> it should work as you've tried.... could you post the code from
> your AppModule where you return your service?
>
>
>
>
>
> Tina Umlandt <ti...@compuserve.de>
> 26.06.2007 17:56
> Bitte antworten an
> "Tapestry users" <us...@tapestry.apache.org>
>
>
> An
> Tapestry users <us...@tapestry.apache.org>
> Kopie
>
> Thema
> Messages and @inject
>
>
>
>
>
>
> hi,
>
> I need my own implementation of the Messages interface. It works fine
with
> the new binding in the HTML-templates. But I
> have a problem to use it as a field in a the class. I tried the
following
>
> @Inject
> @Service ( "myMessages" )
> Messages _message;
>
> I hoped the Injection would know that I use my own implementation but it
> is totally ignored. The tapestry messages are
> injected.
>
> I created a little workaround by implementing a mock interface which
> extends the Messages interface so that the
> injection work properly.
>
> @Inject
> MyMessages _message;
>
> But I don't really like it that way.
>
> The question that I have is:
>
> Is this effect wanted that the user cannot inject his own Messages
> implementation or is it something nobody thought of?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Tina
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: Antwort: Messages and @inject
Posted by Tina Umlandt <ti...@compuserve.de>.
Hej,
I didn't add anything to my AppModule. Do I have to? Which method do you
mean?
Thx,
Tina
Kristian Marinkovic wrote:
> it should work as you've tried.... could you post the code from
> your AppModule where you return your service?
>
>
>
>
>
> Tina Umlandt <ti...@compuserve.de>
> 26.06.2007 17:56
> Bitte antworten an
> "Tapestry users" <us...@tapestry.apache.org>
>
>
> An
> Tapestry users <us...@tapestry.apache.org>
> Kopie
>
> Thema
> Messages and @inject
>
>
>
>
>
>
> hi,
>
> I need my own implementation of the Messages interface. It works fine with
> the new binding in the HTML-templates. But I
> have a problem to use it as a field in a the class. I tried the following
>
> @Inject
> @Service ( "myMessages" )
> Messages _message;
>
> I hoped the Injection would know that I use my own implementation but it
> is totally ignored. The tapestry messages are
> injected.
>
> I created a little workaround by implementing a mock interface which
> extends the Messages interface so that the
> injection work properly.
>
> @Inject
> MyMessages _message;
>
> But I don't really like it that way.
>
> The question that I have is:
>
> Is this effect wanted that the user cannot inject his own Messages
> implementation or is it something nobody thought of?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Tina
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
Antwort: Messages and @inject
Posted by Kristian Marinkovic <kr...@porsche.co.at>.
it should work as you've tried.... could you post the code from
your AppModule where you return your service?
Tina Umlandt <ti...@compuserve.de>
26.06.2007 17:56
Bitte antworten an
"Tapestry users" <us...@tapestry.apache.org>
An
Tapestry users <us...@tapestry.apache.org>
Kopie
Thema
Messages and @inject
hi,
I need my own implementation of the Messages interface. It works fine with
the new binding in the HTML-templates. But I
have a problem to use it as a field in a the class. I tried the following
@Inject
@Service ( "myMessages" )
Messages _message;
I hoped the Injection would know that I use my own implementation but it
is totally ignored. The tapestry messages are
injected.
I created a little workaround by implementing a mock interface which
extends the Messages interface so that the
injection work properly.
@Inject
MyMessages _message;
But I don't really like it that way.
The question that I have is:
Is this effect wanted that the user cannot inject his own Messages
implementation or is it something nobody thought of?
Thanks and regards,
Tina
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org