Re: OAuth client and server demos

[Łukasz Moreń <lu...@gmail.com>]

I've commited some time ago basic scopes handling. More info about that:

Client request access token for a set of scopes, similarly like in oauth
2.0. OAuth 1.0 was missing that so I asses 'x_scope' parameter.
These scopes are presented to the user with friendly description, so he
knows what access allows on. Every scope has assigned java role.
An OAuth filter find associated roles with provided access token, put them
into request and let go request further. It's a authorization framework job
to deal with authorization.
It allows on integration with security annotations like @RolesAllowed, or
spring's @Secured, but I need to work more on that.

Cheers,
Lukasz

2010/8/19 Łukasz Moreń <lu...@gmail.com>

> Yes, it helps.
> For me it looks good to associate permissions and scope with access token.
> I think I will do something similar in cxf.
>
> Btw, I've updated resteasy recently and saw changes in oauth module.:)
>
> Cheers,
> Lukasz
>
> 2010/8/18 Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>
>
> Hi Łukasz
>>
>> 2010/8/16 Łukasz Moreń <lu...@gmail.com>
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I've made changes in demo according to your comments.
>> >
>>
>> thanks.
>>
>>
>> > I will do 'gsoc' tag on my branch to distinguish current gsoc work from
>> > future changes, as today is 'firm pencil down' date.
>> >
>> > ok.
>>
>>
>> > I would like to do additional changes in oauth module.
>> >
>>
>> nice :-).
>>
>>
>> > Access token should be connected with some kind of 'scope' that
>> specifies
>> > a range of  resources it allows to access or operations to invoke.
>> >
>> > For example in RestEasy implementation access token is associated with
>> set
>> > of principal roles.
>> > If there is valid access token in the request, oauth filter set user
>> roles
>> > associated with token to ServletRequest and let pass it further.
>> >
>> > I'm wondering how it can be done in cxf. I would appreciate some help on
>> > that.
>> >
>> >
>> Believe it or not but I've changed all that as part of the work I've been
>> doing recently.
>> Specifically, I've removed the association of roles & principal with
>> access
>> tokens.
>> Instead I've introduced permissions which is really what can be requested
>> by
>> a consumer and publicly
>> shown to the end user, example, "Are you ok with letting 3rd party
>> consumer
>> "doSomething" with your resources" ?. where "doSometing" can be pretty
>> much
>> any expression like "updateYourAlbom", etc, while roles could be "user",
>> etc.
>>
>> It is then a job of filters/login modules/etc to convert permissions into
>> the actual roles, as well as retrieve an authenticated Principal.
>>
>> I've also added "scopes" which are URIs, which I 'borrowed' from the
>> Google
>> docs. Example, a consumer may request a permission to "doSomething" at
>> http://bar. If authorized it can access http://bar, http://bar/1,
>> http://bar/2
>>
>> Does it help ? Any comments ?
>>
>> cheers, Sergey
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> > Lukasz
>> >
>> > 2010/8/14 Łukasz Moreń <lu...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > > Hi Sergey,
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for feedback. More comments below.
>> > >
>> > > 2010/8/13 Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Lucasz
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> 2010/8/13 Łukasz Moreń <lu...@gmail.com>
>> > >>
>> > >> > Hi Sergey,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I've added some improvements to demo and protocol implementation.
>> > >> > I hope this time build will be fine.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> I've had no problems building this time. Thanks for sorting the build
>> > >> issues
>> > >> out.
>> > >> The only minor hitch is that I had to add
>> > >> <relativePath>../../pom.xml</relativePath>
>> > >> to both oauth client & server demo modules in order to build them.
>> Not
>> > >> sure
>> > >> if I could've built them by running
>> > >> 'mvn install' from  samples directly (in
>> > distribution/target/.../samples)
>> > >> given that we also have to use -Pspring3. Not a big issue - please
>> > recheck
>> > >> just in case...
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > Yes, I think I need to add relativePath to pom.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> So I've started server and client web apps and run the demo easily.
>> So
>> > >> it's
>> > >> all nearly there, and IMHO the project is in a good shape, as far as
>> > GSOC
>> > >> is
>> > >> concerned. Hopefully you can continue on preparing it to the move to
>> the
>> > >> trunk :-)
>> > >>
>> > >> Here're some comments to the existing demo - see if you could do
>> > anything
>> > >> till 16th, if not then it can be dealt with later on.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > > I will try do to as much as possible till 16-th. There is still plenty
>> to
>> > > do as I see from your commnets and
>> > > myself so missing things I will add later.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> The client registration form requires a user to register a callback
>> URI.
>> > >> But
>> > >> I understand that a callback URI is only provided by a client, when
>> > >> requesting a temp/request token ? That said, requiring what I'd call
>> a
>> > >> 'connect' or "reply-to" URI registered during the (secure) client
>> > >> registration process may help with enforcing that the actual callback
>> > URI
>> > >> provided by the client *matches* the one provided at the
>> registration,
>> > >> using
>> > >> a startsWith function. I've seen it in the Facebook docs and I also
>> did
>> > >> something similar in my own project - is this the idea ?
>> > >>
>> > > If yes - then please check it's a startsWith check that is used - but
>> > also
>> > >
>> > > consider making providing a callback URI optional at the client
>> > >> registration
>> > >
>> > > time
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Yes, i used it for that reason. It can be jus passed with request
>> token
>> > > request. All current OAuth 1.0 servers I've seen need to preregister
>> > > callback URI,
>> > > and as you said they check if both uri matches.
>> > > There is also possibility to pass 'oob' (out of band) value as
>> callback
>> > URI
>> > > which means has been established via other means,
>> > > so then server use preregistered value. However I think this option is
>> > used
>> > > in case of native apps.
>> > >  .
>> > >
>> > >> The other thing is that a client key is also generated. This is
>> probably
>> > >> correct but I'm wondering would it make sense to let the consumer
>> > register
>> > >> its own key but the authorization server to only generate the shared
>> > >> secret.
>> > >> Consumer might also want to optionally provide its description such
>> as
>> > >> "OAuth 1.0 client" as in the demo, etc.  This might make it a bit
>> > simpler
>> > >> for a client (i.e, it will only have to manage a shared secret).
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > Yes I think it makes sense. So far consumer key is just hash from
>> > > application name and user who registers consumer.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> In a client webapp a PLAINTEXT option is offered - is it OAuth 2.0
>> like
>> > >> thing where HTTPS is assumed ? I'd just consider removing this option
>> > and
>> > >> have only hmac-sha1 left.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > I think it's something similar, however there is no signatures in
>> OAuth
>> > 2.0
>> > > and  access_token is assumed to be short lived,
>> > > ideally one per request, issuing new tokens is done by refresh_token
>> > > parameter.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> This is probably it so far. I'm not very excited about JSPs being
>> used
>> > in
>> > >> the demo :-) but I guess it is not too bad and shows something that
>> many
>> > >> people would consider doing in practice.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > I was not sure about using JSP's neither:), but I wanted to show
>> > basically
>> > > how oauth could be added to existing apps
>> > >  and hadn't other idea how to replace them.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> Overall it is a really good effort toward helping CXF users to
>> > >> start/experiment with OAuth.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Lukasz
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks
>> > >>
>> > >> Sergey
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >> > Lukasz
>> > >> >
>> > >> > 2010/8/13 Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > Hi Łukasz
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > I can see the merges flowing :-), I'll be reviewing your work
>> > tonight;
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > to the list : we've exchanged few private emails to do with build
>> > >> issues
>> > >> > I
>> > >> > > was encountering and Łukasz
>> > >> > >  addressed them fast; we also agreed that for the initial phase
>> > making
>> > >> a
>> > >> > > demo easy to understand and build upon was the main goal...
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > cheers, Sergey
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > 2010/8/5 Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > Hi Łukasz
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > can you please fix checkstyle errors in the demo...
>> > >> > > > Re the callback uri : I think one of the providers on the
>> server
>> > is
>> > >> > > > configured with the callback URI
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > thanks, Sergey
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > 2010/8/2 Łukasz Moreń <lu...@gmail.com>
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> > Please update the demo so that the consume
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> registers itself, plus supplies a callback itself with a
>> request
>> > >> token
>> > >> > > >> >  request
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> callback url is passed in this request, however this request
>> is
>> > >> done
>> > >> > in
>> > >> > > >> backend through URLConnection so it's not visible at UI.
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> Cheers, Lukasz
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> W dniu 2 sierpnia 2010 13:36 użytkownik Łukasz Moreń <
>> > >> > > >> lukasz.moren@gmail.com
>> > >> > > >> > napisał:
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> > Hi,
>> > >> > > >> > I've committed changes I've made:
>> > >> > > >> > - added possibility to register new OAuth client
>> applications
>> > at
>> > >> > OAuth
>> > >> > > >> > server
>> > >> > > >> > - OAuth demos moved to distribution\src\main\samples\
>> > >> > > >> > - added README to OAuth demos
>> > >> > > >> > - fixes in pom.xml files
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >  - fix the checkstyle errors and move the demo to the
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > ""distribution/src/main/release/samples/"" area and also add
>> > >> Readme;
>> > >> > > >> after
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > building the distribution (mvn install in
>> trunk/distribution)
>> > you
>> > >> > can
>> > >> > > >> >> easily
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > verify the demo can be run by locating in the target.
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > fixed that, and added readme
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> - add the oauth dependency in the parent pom so that the
>> > >> rs/oauth
>> > >> > > >> module
>> > >> > > >> >> can
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > depend on it without specifying a version and have the demo
>> > >> client
>> > >> > > >> module
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > depending on rt/rs/oauth module instead (similarly to the
>> > server
>> > >> > one)
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > done, hovewer demo client don't need to depend on
>> rt/rs/oauth
>> > as
>> > >> it
>> > >> > > >> doesn't
>> > >> > > >> > use cxf functionality, just on oauth libraries
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> - during the main build please use the Spring version CXF
>> > >> depends
>> > >> > > upon
>> > >> > > >> and
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > use its -Pspring3 profile to build for the deployment into
>> GAE
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > changed, both client and server demos needs to be build with
>> > >> > -Pspring3
>> > >> > > >> for
>> > >> > > >> > local jetty run and GAE as well.
>> > >> > > >> > Otherwise I would need use different spring config files for
>> > >> spring
>> > >> > > 2.5
>> > >> > > >> and
>> > >> > > >> > 3.0.x
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > Cheers, Lukasz
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > W dniu 29 lipca 2010 21:15 użytkownik Sergey Beryozkin <
>> > >> > > >> > sberyozkin@gmail.com> napisał:
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > Hi
>> > >> > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >> 2010/7/29 Łukasz Moreń <lu...@gmail.com>
>> > >> > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > Hi,
>> > >> > > >> >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > I'm still working on refactoring and changes in demo you
>> > >> > suggested.
>> > >> > > >> >> > I will likely update it tomorrow.
>> > >> > > >> >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > I'll likely ask for some modifications but perhaps if you
>> > >> could
>> > >> > > start
>> > >> > > >> >> with
>> > >> > > >> >> > > updating the demo
>> > >> > > >> >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > such that a consumer initiates its own registration with
>> the
>> > >> > OAuth
>> > >> > > >> >> server.
>> > >> > > >> >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > I'm going to put high effort on my GSoC project next
>> weeks.
>> > I
>> > >> > would
>> > >> > > >> >> really
>> > >> > > >> >> > appreciate,
>> > >> > > >> >> > if you would have some more modifications
>> > requests/directions
>> > >> > which
>> > >> > > >> >> project
>> > >> > > >> >> > should go, as you have limited time next week
>> > >> > > >> >> > and current changes will not take long.
>> > >> > > >> >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > From what I'm seeing, I need to cover spec with code,
>> > simplify
>> > >> > > >> >> > configuration
>> > >> > > >> >> > and do more testing.
>> > >> > > >> >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> I have to sign off now...Please update the demo so that the
>> > >> > consumer
>> > >> > > >> >> registers itself, plus supplies a callback itself with a
>> > request
>> > >> > > token
>> > >> > > >> >> request, add README and it would let users start
>> > experimenting.
>> > >> > IMHO
>> > >> > > >> the
>> > >> > > >> >> initial phase can be considered complete once there's a
>> demo
>> > >> there
>> > >> > > >> which
>> > >> > > >> >> can
>> > >> > > >> >> show users what they need to do.
>> > >> > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >> We can then discuss things further
>> > >> > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >> cheers, Sergey
>> > >> > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > Cheers,
>> > >> > > >> >> > Lukasz
>> > >> > > >> >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > 2010/7/29 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
>> > >> > > >> >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > You probably just need to change your deps to:
>> > >> > > >> >> > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec
>> > >> > > >> >> > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > Dan
>> > >> > > >> >> > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > On Thursday 29 July 2010 3:35:57 pm Sergey Beryozkin
>> > wrote:
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > Hi Lucasz
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > I can't build the oauth sandbox project, seeing
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > [ERROR] FATAL ERROR
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > [INFO]
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> >
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's
>> > POM).
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > Project ID: org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-rs-oauth
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > POM Location:
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> > >> > > /home/sberyozkin/work/cxf/sandbox/oauth_1.0a/rt/rs/oauth/pom.xml
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > Validation Messages:
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >     [0]  'dependencies.dependency.version' is missing
>> > for
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec:jar
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > Reason: Failed to validate POM for project
>> > >> > > >> >> > org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-rs-oauth
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > at
>> > >> > > >>
>> /home/sberyozkin/work/cxf/sandbox/oauth_1.0a/rt/rs/oauth/pom.xml
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > so I can not review the latest merge, sorry. I
>> could've
>> > >> tried
>> > >> > > to
>> > >> > > >> fix
>> > >> > > >> >> > this
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > issue but I'm not sure if you're finished with the
>> > >> > refactoring
>> > >> > > >> just
>> > >> > > >> >> > yet.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > I'll be travelling tomorrow and I'll have some very
>> > >> limited
>> > >> > > time
>> > >> > > >> >> during
>> > >> > > >> >> > > the
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > evenings next week but I'll try to provide some
>> feedback
>> > >> at
>> > >> > > least
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > cheers, Sergey
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > 2010/7/26 Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > Hi Łukasz
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > 2010/7/26 Łukasz Moreń <lu...@gmail.com>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > Hi Sergey,
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> I'm really sorry for such commit, I know it
>> shouldn't
>> > >> > > happen.
>> > >> > > >> I
>> > >> > > >> >> > turned
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> off checkstyle as i couldn't configure it properly
>> on
>> > >> > > intellij
>> > >> > > >> >> and
>> > >> > > >> >> > it
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> was annoying during development.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> I will apply proper changes ASAP.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> no worries at all, I've broken the real builds
>> with
>> > >> > > checkstyle
>> > >> > > >> >> > errors
>> > >> > > >> >> > > so
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > many times and it is the CXF sandbox after :-)
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> According to the demo, I built it as usual
>> web-app,
>> > if
>> > >> it
>> > >> > > >> worked,
>> > >> > > >> >> > use
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> this same sources to deploy on GAE.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> However because of GAE restrictions it always
>> needs
>> > >> minor
>> > >> > > >> changes
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> before deploy, i.e. GAE can't read configuration
>> > files
>> > >> > such
>> > >> > > >> as:
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> cxf-extension-http.xml
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> from jars, so I copied it to WEB-INF folder.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> Commited to svn version does not depend on GAE SDK
>> > and
>> > >> can
>> > >> > > be
>> > >> > > >> run
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> locally with jetty:run.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> Yes, I warned about server configuration part:). I
>> > will
>> > >> > take
>> > >> > > >> care
>> > >> > > >> >> to
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> make it simpler.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > I do not think it is too complicated - the
>> > >> simplification
>> > >> > can
>> > >> > > >> be
>> > >> > > >> >> done
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > once the whole flow is sound...
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> So far, oauth consumer properties are hardcoded
>> and
>> > >> > injected
>> > >> > > >> into
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> oauth provider, as I think it is not oauth library
>> > >> > > >> responsibility
>> > >> > > >> >> to
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> deal with consumer registration.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> Hovewer for demo it would be good to have
>> something
>> > >> like
>> > >> > > that.
>> > >> > > >> I
>> > >> > > >> >> > would
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> do registration form at the server as it is done
>> by
>> > >> > current
>> > >> > > >> big
>> > >> > > >> >> > oauth
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> implementations.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > I agree that conceptually the registration of
>> > consumers
>> > >> is
>> > >> > a
>> > >> > > >> >> separate
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > issue. But it is part of the solution that users
>> will
>> > be
>> > >> > > >> >> eventually
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > offering so just showing them that the consumers
>> have
>> > to
>> > >> go
>> > >> > > and
>> > >> > > >> >> > > register
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > themselves with help people with coming up with
>> some
>> > >> custom
>> > >> > > >> >> > > registration
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > forms, etc. The registration does not have to be
>> done
>> > at
>> > >> > the
>> > >> > > >> >> server
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > hosting the resource, it is just important for the
>> > OAuth
>> > >> > > >> provider
>> > >> > > >> >> be
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > able to get to the consumer details. I'm fine with
>> > >> assuming
>> > >> > > at
>> > >> > > >> the
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > moment that the registration handler is collocated
>> > with
>> > >> the
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > endpoints/providers enforcing OAuth flow.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > But the callback uri which is being injected at the
>> > >> moment
>> > >> > > >> should
>> > >> > > >> >> go
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > anyway given that it is part of the actual flow,
>> > >> > > specifically,
>> > >> > > >> the
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > consumer provides it during the request token
>> request
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> Recently I've noticed that Camel have done oauth
>> > client
>> > >> as
>> > >> > > >> >> well:):
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> http://camel.apache.org/tutorial-oauth.html
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> Thanks much for review, and hints.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > thanks for your effort :-)
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > Sergey
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> Cheers,
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> Lukasz
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> 2010/7/24 Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com
>> >:
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > Hi Łukasz
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > Sorry for a delay,  I should've come back
>> earlier
>> > to
>> > >> > you.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > I've run the demo hosted at the app engine and I
>> > >> think
>> > >> > > from
>> > >> > > >> the
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> education
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > point of view it is a good demo and it is handy
>> one
>> > >> does
>> > >> > > not
>> > >> > > >> >> even
>> > >> > > >> >> > > has
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > to build anything in order to try it.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > I've had a problem building the rt/rs/oauth
>> tests -
>> > >> > > there's
>> > >> > > >> a
>> > >> > > >> >> > bunch
>> > >> > > >> >> > > of
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > CheckStyle errors. Can you please build
>> > >> > sandbox/oauth_1.0a
>> > >> > > >> from
>> > >> > > >> >> > the
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> trunk,
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > just do 'mvn install -Pfastinstall' and then do
>> > 'mvn
>> > >> > > >> install'
>> > >> > > >> >> from
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> rt/rs/ ?
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > One other thing, please move the demo to
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > "distribution/src/main/release/samples/" as well
>> > add
>> > >> > > Readme
>> > >> > > >> to
>> > >> > > >> >> it.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > Also I can not build the demo too, the client
>> build
>> > >> > fails
>> > >> > > >> with
>> > >> > > >> >> the
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> following
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > dependency missing
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > 1) net.oauth.core:oauth-consumer:jar:20100527
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > But I'm seeing an oauth repo in the rt/rs/oauth
>> > pom,
>> > >> > have
>> > >> > > >> you
>> > >> > > >> >> > built
>> > >> > > >> >> > > it
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> in
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > the GAE dev environment ?
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > Can you please spend a bit of time on cleaning
>> the
>> > >> build
>> > >> > a
>> > >> > > >> bit
>> > >> > > >> >> :
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > - fix the checkstyle errors and move the demo to
>> > the
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > ""distribution/src/main/release/samples/"" area
>> and
>> > >> also
>> > >> > > add
>> > >> > > >> >> > Readme;
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> after
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > building the distribution (mvn install in
>> > >> > > >> trunk/distribution)
>> > >> > > >> >> you
>> > >> > > >> >> > > can
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> easily
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > verify the demo can be run by locating in the
>> > target.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > - add the oauth dependency in the parent pom so
>> > that
>> > >> the
>> > >> > > >> >> rs/oauth
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > module
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> can
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > depend on it without specifying a version and
>> have
>> > >> the
>> > >> > > demo
>> > >> > > >> >> client
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> module
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > depending on rt/rs/oauth module instead
>> (similarly
>> > to
>> > >> > the
>> > >> > > >> >> server
>> > >> > > >> >> > > one)
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > - during the main build please use the Spring
>> > version
>> > >> > CXF
>> > >> > > >> >> depends
>> > >> > > >> >> > > upon
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> and
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > use its -Pspring3 profile to build for the
>> > deployment
>> > >> > into
>> > >> > > >> GAE
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > As far as the demo is concerned. I looked at the
>> > >> server
>> > >> > > part
>> > >> > > >> >> and
>> > >> > > >> >> > it
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> looks
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > complicated enough :-) but I think it makes
>> sense
>> > to
>> > >> me.
>> > >> > > >> I'll
>> > >> > > >> >> > likely
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > ask
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> for
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > some modifications but perhaps if you could
>> start
>> > >> with
>> > >> > > >> updating
>> > >> > > >> >> > the
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > demo such that a consumer initiates its own
>> > >> registration
>> > >> > > >> with
>> > >> > > >> >> the
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > OAuth
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> server :
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > I can see at the moment an oauth provider is
>> > injected
>> > >> > with
>> > >> > > >> some
>> > >> > > >> >> > > sample
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > consumer properties. I'm not sure what is the
>> best
>> > >> way
>> > >> > to
>> > >> > > do
>> > >> > > >> it
>> > >> > > >> >> :
>> > >> > > >> >> > > may
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > be
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> the
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > server can return a registration form or the
>> client
>> > >> can
>> > >> > > just
>> > >> > > >> >> push
>> > >> > > >> >> > > the
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > registration info itself.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > Overall I think it is a good progress indeed
>> > >> especially
>> > >> > > >> given
>> > >> > > >> >> the
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> complexity
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > of the whole effort.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > thanks, Sergey
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Łukasz Moreń <
>> > >> > > >> >> > > lukasz.moren@gmail.com
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >wrote:
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> Hi all,
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> I have managed to create two sample OAuth
>> > >> aplications:
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> ordinary OAuth 1.0a client:
>> > >> > > >> >> http://www.oauthclient.appspot.com
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> and authorization server that uses CXF OAuth
>> > module:
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> http://www.cxfoauthserver.appspot.com
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> Both sample applications and changes in oauth
>> > >> library
>> > >> > are
>> > >> > > >> >> > commited
>> > >> > > >> >> > > in
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> sandbox.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> OAuth configuration in sample authorization
>> server
>> > >> app
>> > >> > > >> looks a
>> > >> > > >> >> > bit
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> awfully but I think most of that can be hidden
>> and
>> > >> done
>> > >> > > out
>> > >> > > >> of
>> > >> > > >> >> > > band.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> There is still some areas in specification not
>> > >> covered
>> > >> > by
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> implementation, so I would like to take care of
>> > that
>> > >> in
>> > >> > > >> next
>> > >> > > >> >> > steps.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> Thanks in advance for some feedback.
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> Cheers,
>> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> Lukasz
>> > >> > > >> >> > >
>> > >> > > >> >> > > --
>> > >> > > >> >> > > Daniel Kulp
>> > >> > > >> >> > > dkulp@apache.org
>> > >> > > >> >> > > http://dankulp.com/blog
>> > >> > > >> >> > >
>> > >> > > >> >> >
>> > >> > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>