You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Alex Savitsky (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/03/24 19:55:53 UTC

[jira] [Created] (CAMEL-8541) Came main TestSupport class is incompatible with the CDI specification

Alex Savitsky created CAMEL-8541:
------------------------------------

             Summary: Came main TestSupport class is incompatible with the CDI specification
                 Key: CAMEL-8541
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8541
             Project: Camel
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: camel-test
    Affects Versions: 2.14.2, 2.12.5
            Reporter: Alex Savitsky


JUnit4 test support class (org.apache.camel.test.junit4.TestSupport) contains the following declaration:

{noformat}
    // CHECKSTYLE:OFF
    @Rule
    public TestName testName = new TestName();
    // CHECKSTYLE:ON
{noformat}

In addition to being a terrible idea overall, this public field also breaks CDI integration, as any tests attempted to be bootstrapped in CDI will throw the following error (WELD trace is shown for an example):

{noformat}
org.jboss.weld.exceptions.DefinitionException: WELD-000075: Normal scoped managed bean implementation class has a public field:  [EnhancedAnnotatedFieldImpl] @Rule public com.netotc.ha.route.TestCDI.testName
	at org.jboss.weld.bean.ManagedBean.checkBeanImplementation(ManagedBean.java:227)
	at org.jboss.weld.bean.AbstractClassBean.internalInitialize(AbstractClassBean.java:74)
	at org.jboss.weld.bean.ManagedBean.internalInitialize(ManagedBean.java:105)
	at org.jboss.weld.bean.RIBean.initialize(RIBean.java:66)
	at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.ConcurrentBeanDeployer$5.doWork(ConcurrentBeanDeployer.java:121)
	at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.ConcurrentBeanDeployer$5.doWork(ConcurrentBeanDeployer.java:118)
	at org.jboss.weld.executor.IterativeWorkerTaskFactory$1.call(IterativeWorkerTaskFactory.java:60)
	at org.jboss.weld.executor.IterativeWorkerTaskFactory$1.call(IterativeWorkerTaskFactory.java:53)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)

{noformat}

Suggesting to create a getter for this field, making the field private, and moving the @Rule annotation to the getter.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)