You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Alex Savitsky (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/03/24 19:55:53 UTC
[jira] [Created] (CAMEL-8541) Came main TestSupport class is
incompatible with the CDI specification
Alex Savitsky created CAMEL-8541:
------------------------------------
Summary: Came main TestSupport class is incompatible with the CDI specification
Key: CAMEL-8541
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8541
Project: Camel
Issue Type: Bug
Components: camel-test
Affects Versions: 2.14.2, 2.12.5
Reporter: Alex Savitsky
JUnit4 test support class (org.apache.camel.test.junit4.TestSupport) contains the following declaration:
{noformat}
// CHECKSTYLE:OFF
@Rule
public TestName testName = new TestName();
// CHECKSTYLE:ON
{noformat}
In addition to being a terrible idea overall, this public field also breaks CDI integration, as any tests attempted to be bootstrapped in CDI will throw the following error (WELD trace is shown for an example):
{noformat}
org.jboss.weld.exceptions.DefinitionException: WELD-000075: Normal scoped managed bean implementation class has a public field: [EnhancedAnnotatedFieldImpl] @Rule public com.netotc.ha.route.TestCDI.testName
at org.jboss.weld.bean.ManagedBean.checkBeanImplementation(ManagedBean.java:227)
at org.jboss.weld.bean.AbstractClassBean.internalInitialize(AbstractClassBean.java:74)
at org.jboss.weld.bean.ManagedBean.internalInitialize(ManagedBean.java:105)
at org.jboss.weld.bean.RIBean.initialize(RIBean.java:66)
at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.ConcurrentBeanDeployer$5.doWork(ConcurrentBeanDeployer.java:121)
at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.ConcurrentBeanDeployer$5.doWork(ConcurrentBeanDeployer.java:118)
at org.jboss.weld.executor.IterativeWorkerTaskFactory$1.call(IterativeWorkerTaskFactory.java:60)
at org.jboss.weld.executor.IterativeWorkerTaskFactory$1.call(IterativeWorkerTaskFactory.java:53)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
{noformat}
Suggesting to create a getter for this field, making the field private, and moving the @Rule annotation to the getter.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)