svn commit: r1212321 - /jackrabbit/sandbox/jackrabbit-microkernel/NOTICE.txt

[md...@apache.org]

Author: mduerig
Date: Fri Dec  9 10:27:16 2011
New Revision: 1212321

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1212321&view=rev
Log:
Microkernel based prototype of JCR implementation (WIP)
Add NOTICE file and cite sources

Added:
    jackrabbit/sandbox/jackrabbit-microkernel/NOTICE.txt

Added: jackrabbit/sandbox/jackrabbit-microkernel/NOTICE.txt
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jackrabbit/sandbox/jackrabbit-microkernel/NOTICE.txt?rev=1212321&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- jackrabbit/sandbox/jackrabbit-microkernel/NOTICE.txt (added)
+++ jackrabbit/sandbox/jackrabbit-microkernel/NOTICE.txt Fri Dec  9 10:27:16 2011
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Some JSON documents included in the test cases are taken from
+the rapidjson project(https://code.google.com/p/rapidjson/).

Re: svn commit: r1212321 - /jackrabbit/sandbox/jackrabbit-microkernel/NOTICE.txt

[Michael Dürig <md...@apache.org>]

On 9.12.11 16:51, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Michael Dürig<md...@apache.org>  wrote:
>> IIUC it is correct to have the notice in that file.
>
> Actually not, at least as far as recent consensus from
> legal-discuss@apache.org goes. See JCR-2322 [1] and the related
> LEGAL-62 [2] for more background.

So the MIT license should go into the LICENSE file along with the Apache 
license? And the NOTICE file should contain nothing except for the 
standard header? Sorry I'm a bit lost here...

Michael

>
>> What is missing is the MIT license in the license file.
>
> Yep, we should add the LICENSE file.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2322
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-62
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1212321 - /jackrabbit/sandbox/jackrabbit-microkernel/NOTICE.txt

[Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Michael Dürig <md...@apache.org> wrote:
> IIUC it is correct to have the notice in that file.

Actually not, at least as far as recent consensus from
legal-discuss@apache.org goes. See JCR-2322 [1] and the related
LEGAL-62 [2] for more background.

> What is missing is the MIT license in the license file.

Yep, we should add the LICENSE file.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2322
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-62

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1212321 - /jackrabbit/sandbox/jackrabbit-microkernel/NOTICE.txt

[Michael Dürig <md...@apache.org>]

On 9.12.11 10:36, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM,<md...@apache.org>  wrote:
>> Microkernel based prototype of JCR implementation (WIP)
>> Add NOTICE file and cite sources
>
> This sounds more like something that should go into a LICENSE file.
> See  [1] and [2] for more details on what should be in the NOTICE
> file.
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
> [2] http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices

IIUC it is correct to have the notice in that file. What is missing is 
the MIT license in the license file.

Michael

Re: svn commit: r1212321 - /jackrabbit/sandbox/jackrabbit-microkernel/NOTICE.txt

[Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM,  <md...@apache.org> wrote:
> Microkernel based prototype of JCR implementation (WIP)
> Add NOTICE file and cite sources

This sounds more like something that should go into a LICENSE file.
See  [1] and [2] for more details on what should be in the NOTICE
file.

[1] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
[2] http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices

BR,

Jukka Zitting