You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ddlutils-dev@db.apache.org by "Thomas Dudziak (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/08/11 07:19:44 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (DDLUTILS-214) Primary Key Column order lost (a
problem if there are multiple Primary Keys)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DDLUTILS-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Thomas Dudziak resolved DDLUTILS-214.
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> Primary Key Column order lost (a problem if there are multiple Primary Keys)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DDLUTILS-214
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DDLUTILS-214
> Project: DdlUtils
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core (No specific database)
> Affects Versions: 1.1
> Environment: Any
> Reporter: Rijk van Haaften
> Assignee: Thomas Dudziak
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.1
>
>
> Symptom:
> 14558 [btpool0-5] DEBUG org.apache.ddlutils.platform.postgresql.PostgreSqlPlatform - About to execute SQL DELETE FROM "a" WHERE "p" = ? AND "q" = ?
> The delete sometimes works, sometimes I get this:
> 14569 [btpool0-5] WARN org.apache.ddlutils.platform.postgresql.PostgreSqlPlatform - Attempted to delete a single row "a": q = 6, p = 3 in table "a" but changed 0 row(s).
> Symptom analysis:
> The query
> DELETE FROM "a" WHERE "p" = ? AND "q" = ?
> is filled in order (6,3), without regarding the field names (q = 6, p = 3) resulting in
> DELETE FROM "a" WHERE "p" = 6 AND "q" = 3
> Code analysis
> 1. SqlBuilder.getDeleteSql
> SqlBuilder.getDeleteSql uses the Map pkValues iterator to generate the prepared statement.
> 2. PlatformImplBase.toColumknValues
> This has a major problem: Map iterator order is not defined. Java documentation: "Some map implementations, like the TreeMap class, make specific guarantees as to their order; others, like the HashMap class, do not." In this case, the Map used is created by PlatformImplBase.toColumknValues:
> protected HashMap toColumnValues(SqlDynaProperty[] properties, DynaBean bean) {
> HashMap result = new HashMap();
> ...
> }
> so iterator order is undefined.
> 3. PlatformImplBase.delete (for example)
> a)
> String sql = createDeleteSql(model, dynaClass, primaryKeys, null);
> createDeleteSql uses getDeleteSql (1) and due to (2), the order the columns in the generated String sql is undefined. So, this could generate either
> DELETE FROM "a" WHERE "p" = ? AND "q" = ?
> DELETE FROM "a" WHERE "q" = ? AND "p" = ?
> which one cannot be determined
> b) setObject uses a deterministic array order sqlIndex to fill the ? - marks
> SqlDynaProperty[] primaryKeys = dynaClass.getPrimaryKeyProperties();
> for (int idx = 0; idx < primaryKeys.length; idx++)
> {
> setObject(statement, idx + 1, dynaBean, primaryKeys[idx]);
> }
> so there is a chance of 1/(number of PK columns) this will run correctly.
> Solution:
> use LinkedHashMap or TreeMap: they retain put-order, which is based on the SqlDynaProperty[] so by definition has the same order as the setObject loop:
> protected HashMap toColumnValues(SqlDynaProperty[] properties, DynaBean bean)
> {
> HashMap result = new LinkedHashMap();
> ...
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.