You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Chris Santerre <cs...@MerchantsOverseas.com> on 2005/05/10 22:51:11 UTC

RE: ws.surbl.org scores before and after Chris Santerre data gone ?


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:felicity@kluge.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 4:34 PM
>To: Spamassassin Devel List
>Subject: Re: ws.surbl.org scores before and after Chris Santerre data
>gone?
>
>
>> > On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:16:11PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> >> If so can you provide a before and after ham/spam summary as of
>> >> say a week ago and now-ish?
>> 
>> > For SpamAssassin, our last weekly run (does net checks) 
>failed due to a code
>> > issue.  Oops.  In theory, the next weekly run (on 
>Saturdays) should occur and
>> > we can compare it to the results from 2 weeks ago.
>
>Ok, the two run sizes are a bit different, but you can get 
>general stats from
>this I think:
>
>Previous run (4/23):
>
>OVERALL%   SPAM%     HAM%     S/O    RANK   SCORE  NAME
> 182168   109007    73161    0.598   0.00    0.00  (all messages)
> 12.750  21.3041   0.0055    1.000   0.99    0.00  URIBL_SC_SURBL
> 36.463  60.9135   0.0328    0.999   0.98    0.00  URIBL_JP_SURBL
>  9.809  16.3843   0.0109    0.999   0.97    0.00  URIBL_AB_SURBL
> 36.982  61.7355   0.1011    0.998   0.89    0.00  URIBL_WS_SURBL
> 38.506  64.2683   0.1203    0.998   0.87    0.00  URIBL_OB_SURBL
>  0.211   0.3532   0.0000    1.000   0.66    0.00  URIBL_PH_SURBL
>
>Latest run (5/8):
>
>OVERALL%   SPAM%     HAM%     S/O    RANK   SCORE  NAME
> 339239   240537    98702    0.709   0.00    0.00  (all messages)
>100.000  70.9049  29.0951    0.709   0.00    0.00  (all messages as %)
> 13.111  18.4895   0.0020    1.000   0.98    0.00  URIBL_SC_SURBL
> 37.333  52.6451   0.0172    1.000   0.98    0.00  URIBL_JP_SURBL
>  8.836  12.4600   0.0041    1.000   0.97    0.00  URIBL_AB_SURBL
> 38.140  53.7672   0.0567    0.999   0.91    0.00  URIBL_OB_SURBL
> 40.770  57.4652   0.0841    0.999   0.87    0.00  URIBL_WS_SURBL
>  0.215   0.3035   0.0000    1.000   0.61    0.00  URIBL_PH_SURBL
>

Dang! I actually expected more of a difference then .02! (Insert my 2 cents
joke)

Well I guess my additions wern't as bad as I thought :) 

Are you guys going to test black.uribl.com for future releases?

Thanks Theo!

--Chris




Re: ws.surbl.org scores before and after Chris Santerre data gone ?

Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@kluge.net>.
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 04:51:11PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Are you guys going to test black.uribl.com for future releases?

I'm not opposed assuming there's nothing crazy I don't know about with
it. ;)

Feel free to open a ticket about it, along with any information we should
know for test rules, etc.   We'll likely get to it post-3.1.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Bride, n.:
 	A woman with a fine prospect of happiness behind her.
 		-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"