You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Chris Santerre <cs...@MerchantsOverseas.com> on 2005/05/10 22:51:11 UTC
RE: ws.surbl.org scores before and after Chris Santerre data gone
?
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:felicity@kluge.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 4:34 PM
>To: Spamassassin Devel List
>Subject: Re: ws.surbl.org scores before and after Chris Santerre data
>gone?
>
>
>> > On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:16:11PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
>> >> If so can you provide a before and after ham/spam summary as of
>> >> say a week ago and now-ish?
>>
>> > For SpamAssassin, our last weekly run (does net checks)
>failed due to a code
>> > issue. Oops. In theory, the next weekly run (on
>Saturdays) should occur and
>> > we can compare it to the results from 2 weeks ago.
>
>Ok, the two run sizes are a bit different, but you can get
>general stats from
>this I think:
>
>Previous run (4/23):
>
>OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
> 182168 109007 73161 0.598 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
> 12.750 21.3041 0.0055 1.000 0.99 0.00 URIBL_SC_SURBL
> 36.463 60.9135 0.0328 0.999 0.98 0.00 URIBL_JP_SURBL
> 9.809 16.3843 0.0109 0.999 0.97 0.00 URIBL_AB_SURBL
> 36.982 61.7355 0.1011 0.998 0.89 0.00 URIBL_WS_SURBL
> 38.506 64.2683 0.1203 0.998 0.87 0.00 URIBL_OB_SURBL
> 0.211 0.3532 0.0000 1.000 0.66 0.00 URIBL_PH_SURBL
>
>Latest run (5/8):
>
>OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
> 339239 240537 98702 0.709 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
>100.000 70.9049 29.0951 0.709 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %)
> 13.111 18.4895 0.0020 1.000 0.98 0.00 URIBL_SC_SURBL
> 37.333 52.6451 0.0172 1.000 0.98 0.00 URIBL_JP_SURBL
> 8.836 12.4600 0.0041 1.000 0.97 0.00 URIBL_AB_SURBL
> 38.140 53.7672 0.0567 0.999 0.91 0.00 URIBL_OB_SURBL
> 40.770 57.4652 0.0841 0.999 0.87 0.00 URIBL_WS_SURBL
> 0.215 0.3035 0.0000 1.000 0.61 0.00 URIBL_PH_SURBL
>
Dang! I actually expected more of a difference then .02! (Insert my 2 cents
joke)
Well I guess my additions wern't as bad as I thought :)
Are you guys going to test black.uribl.com for future releases?
Thanks Theo!
--Chris
Re: ws.surbl.org scores before and after Chris Santerre data gone ?
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@kluge.net>.
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 04:51:11PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Are you guys going to test black.uribl.com for future releases?
I'm not opposed assuming there's nothing crazy I don't know about with
it. ;)
Feel free to open a ticket about it, along with any information we should
know for test rules, etc. We'll likely get to it post-3.1.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Bride, n.:
A woman with a fine prospect of happiness behind her.
-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"