You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com> on 2011/02/08 23:26:47 UTC
[DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
Hi,
Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0
roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time
to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4.
According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch,
perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no
other open issues listed for 2.1.4.
-Jamie
Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Btw, I've seen KARAF-430 being fixed only in 2.1.x branch, can we also
backport that one to 2.2.x and trunk ?
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 08:16, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using the following query:
>
> project=Karaf AND affectedVersion<"3.0.0" AND status=Open
>
> I would say KARAF-440 and KARAF-18 may be interesting. KARAF-8 is already fixed
> I assume. KARAF-7 maybe also be valid...
>
> I can validate/take a look at KARAF-440 and KARAF-8 till the end of this week.
>
> kind regards,
> andreas
>
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:56:47PM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0
>> roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time
>> to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4.
>>
>> According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch,
>> perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no
>> other open issues listed for 2.1.4.
>>
>> -Jamie
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
Using the following query:
project=Karaf AND affectedVersion<"3.0.0" AND status=Open
I would say KARAF-440 and KARAF-18 may be interesting. KARAF-8 is already fixed
I assume. KARAF-7 maybe also be valid...
I can validate/take a look at KARAF-440 and KARAF-8 till the end of this week.
kind regards,
andreas
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:56:47PM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0
> roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time
> to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4.
>
> According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch,
> perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no
> other open issues listed for 2.1.4.
>
> -Jamie
Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
I've added the 2.1.5 to versions to JIRA, and bumped this issue's fix
version out to 2.1.5 :)
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed. Though that version does not exists yet.
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 23:07, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Karaf-458 was added to the 2.1.4 'to fix' list, perhaps we can move
>> this along to 2.1.5?
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Sounds like we have some consensus to start the process soon... we've
>>> just updated the web site infrastructure to Scalate, so I'd like to
>>> give some time to validate that all is in order before kicking off a
>>> release candidate build.
>>>
>>> In the mean time I'll start in on updating the readme, etc.
>>>
>>> J
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> My +1 for the 2.1.4
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 for a 2.1.4 release
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/2/11 <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>>>>> > I would like to work on documentation this afternoon, before the release.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I do my best to do it shortly.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks
>>>>> > Regards
>>>>> > JB
>>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>>> > From: "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>>> > Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:24:26
>>>>> > To: <de...@karaf.apache.org>
>>>>> > Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org
>>>>> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I'd like to hear back from JB on his manual updates, I could wait on
>>>>> > starting the release candidate process if he has a bunch of updates it
>>>>> > could pick up. Otherwise I'm good to start things rolling :)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > J
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >> mhm, from my point of view we can go ahead with this release. IMHO we've
>>>>> >> included a bunch of fixes and there are no further critical fixes on the
>>>>> list
>>>>> >> --> +1 for going ahead
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> kind regards,
>>>>> >> andreas
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:56:47PM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
>>>>> >>> Hi,
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0
>>>>> >>> roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time
>>>>> >>> to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch,
>>>>> >>> perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no
>>>>> >>> other open issues listed for 2.1.4.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> -Jamie
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Ioannis Canellos*
>>>> http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>> Integration Engineer @ Upstream S.A. <http://www.upstreamsystems.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Agreed. Though that version does not exists yet.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 23:07, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Karaf-458 was added to the 2.1.4 'to fix' list, perhaps we can move
> this along to 2.1.5?
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sounds like we have some consensus to start the process soon... we've
>> just updated the web site infrastructure to Scalate, so I'd like to
>> give some time to validate that all is in order before kicking off a
>> release candidate build.
>>
>> In the mean time I'll start in on updating the readme, etc.
>>
>> J
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> My +1 for the 2.1.4
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for a 2.1.4 release
>>>>
>>>> 2011/2/11 <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>>>> > I would like to work on documentation this afternoon, before the release.
>>>> >
>>>> > I do my best to do it shortly.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks
>>>> > Regards
>>>> > JB
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > From: "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>> > Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:24:26
>>>> > To: <de...@karaf.apache.org>
>>>> > Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org
>>>> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
>>>> >
>>>> > I'd like to hear back from JB on his manual updates, I could wait on
>>>> > starting the release candidate process if he has a bunch of updates it
>>>> > could pick up. Otherwise I'm good to start things rolling :)
>>>> >
>>>> > J
>>>> >
>>>> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> mhm, from my point of view we can go ahead with this release. IMHO we've
>>>> >> included a bunch of fixes and there are no further critical fixes on the
>>>> list
>>>> >> --> +1 for going ahead
>>>> >>
>>>> >> kind regards,
>>>> >> andreas
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:56:47PM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
>>>> >>> Hi,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0
>>>> >>> roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time
>>>> >>> to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch,
>>>> >>> perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no
>>>> >>> other open issues listed for 2.1.4.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> -Jamie
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Ioannis Canellos*
>>> http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>>>
>>> Integration Engineer @ Upstream S.A. <http://www.upstreamsystems.com>
>>>
>>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Karaf-458 was added to the 2.1.4 'to fix' list, perhaps we can move
this along to 2.1.5?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Jamie G. <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like we have some consensus to start the process soon... we've
> just updated the web site infrastructure to Scalate, so I'd like to
> give some time to validate that all is in order before kicking off a
> release candidate build.
>
> In the mean time I'll start in on updating the readme, etc.
>
> J
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> My +1 for the 2.1.4
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for a 2.1.4 release
>>>
>>> 2011/2/11 <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>>> > I would like to work on documentation this afternoon, before the release.
>>> >
>>> > I do my best to do it shortly.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Regards
>>> > JB
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>
>>> > Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:24:26
>>> > To: <de...@karaf.apache.org>
>>> > Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org
>>> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
>>> >
>>> > I'd like to hear back from JB on his manual updates, I could wait on
>>> > starting the release candidate process if he has a bunch of updates it
>>> > could pick up. Otherwise I'm good to start things rolling :)
>>> >
>>> > J
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> mhm, from my point of view we can go ahead with this release. IMHO we've
>>> >> included a bunch of fixes and there are no further critical fixes on the
>>> list
>>> >> --> +1 for going ahead
>>> >>
>>> >> kind regards,
>>> >> andreas
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:56:47PM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
>>> >>> Hi,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0
>>> >>> roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time
>>> >>> to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch,
>>> >>> perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no
>>> >>> other open issues listed for 2.1.4.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -Jamie
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Ioannis Canellos*
>> http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>>
>> Integration Engineer @ Upstream S.A. <http://www.upstreamsystems.com>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
Sounds like we have some consensus to start the process soon... we've
just updated the web site infrastructure to Scalate, so I'd like to
give some time to validate that all is in order before kicking off a
release candidate build.
In the mean time I'll start in on updating the readme, etc.
J
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My +1 for the 2.1.4
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>> +1 for a 2.1.4 release
>>
>> 2011/2/11 <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
>> > I would like to work on documentation this afternoon, before the release.
>> >
>> > I do my best to do it shortly.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Regards
>> > JB
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:24:26
>> > To: <de...@karaf.apache.org>
>> > Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
>> >
>> > I'd like to hear back from JB on his manual updates, I could wait on
>> > starting the release candidate process if he has a bunch of updates it
>> > could pick up. Otherwise I'm good to start things rolling :)
>> >
>> > J
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> mhm, from my point of view we can go ahead with this release. IMHO we've
>> >> included a bunch of fixes and there are no further critical fixes on the
>> list
>> >> --> +1 for going ahead
>> >>
>> >> kind regards,
>> >> andreas
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:56:47PM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0
>> >>> roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time
>> >>> to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4.
>> >>>
>> >>> According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch,
>> >>> perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no
>> >>> other open issues listed for 2.1.4.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Jamie
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Ioannis Canellos*
> http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>
> Integration Engineer @ Upstream S.A. <http://www.upstreamsystems.com>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
Posted by Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com>.
My +1 for the 2.1.4
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> +1 for a 2.1.4 release
>
> 2011/2/11 <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> > I would like to work on documentation this afternoon, before the release.
> >
> > I do my best to do it shortly.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Regards
> > JB
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:24:26
> > To: <de...@karaf.apache.org>
> > Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
> >
> > I'd like to hear back from JB on his manual updates, I could wait on
> > starting the release candidate process if he has a bunch of updates it
> > could pick up. Otherwise I'm good to start things rolling :)
> >
> > J
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> mhm, from my point of view we can go ahead with this release. IMHO we've
> >> included a bunch of fixes and there are no further critical fixes on the
> list
> >> --> +1 for going ahead
> >>
> >> kind regards,
> >> andreas
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:56:47PM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0
> >>> roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time
> >>> to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4.
> >>>
> >>> According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch,
> >>> perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no
> >>> other open issues listed for 2.1.4.
> >>>
> >>> -Jamie
> >>
> >
>
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
http://iocanel.blogspot.com
Integration Engineer @ Upstream S.A. <http://www.upstreamsystems.com>
Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
+1 for a 2.1.4 release
2011/2/11 <jb...@nanthrax.net>:
> I would like to work on documentation this afternoon, before the release.
>
> I do my best to do it shortly.
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:24:26
> To: <de...@karaf.apache.org>
> Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
>
> I'd like to hear back from JB on his manual updates, I could wait on
> starting the release candidate process if he has a bunch of updates it
> could pick up. Otherwise I'm good to start things rolling :)
>
> J
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> mhm, from my point of view we can go ahead with this release. IMHO we've
>> included a bunch of fixes and there are no further critical fixes on the list
>> --> +1 for going ahead
>>
>> kind regards,
>> andreas
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:56:47PM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0
>>> roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time
>>> to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4.
>>>
>>> According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch,
>>> perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no
>>> other open issues listed for 2.1.4.
>>>
>>> -Jamie
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
Posted by jb...@nanthrax.net.
I would like to work on documentation this afternoon, before the release.
I do my best to do it shortly.
Thanks
Regards
JB
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:24:26
To: <de...@karaf.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@karaf.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
I'd like to hear back from JB on his manual updates, I could wait on
starting the release candidate process if he has a bunch of updates it
could pick up. Otherwise I'm good to start things rolling :)
J
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> mhm, from my point of view we can go ahead with this release. IMHO we've
> included a bunch of fixes and there are no further critical fixes on the list
> --> +1 for going ahead
>
> kind regards,
> andreas
>
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:56:47PM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0
>> roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time
>> to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4.
>>
>> According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch,
>> perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no
>> other open issues listed for 2.1.4.
>>
>> -Jamie
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
I'd like to hear back from JB on his manual updates, I could wait on
starting the release candidate process if he has a bunch of updates it
could pick up. Otherwise I'm good to start things rolling :)
J
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> mhm, from my point of view we can go ahead with this release. IMHO we've
> included a bunch of fixes and there are no further critical fixes on the list
> --> +1 for going ahead
>
> kind regards,
> andreas
>
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:56:47PM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0
>> roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time
>> to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4.
>>
>> According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch,
>> perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no
>> other open issues listed for 2.1.4.
>>
>> -Jamie
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Karaf 2.1.4 status
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
mhm, from my point of view we can go ahead with this release. IMHO we've
included a bunch of fixes and there are no further critical fixes on the list
--> +1 for going ahead
kind regards,
andreas
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:56:47PM -0330, Jamie G. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that we have Karaf 2.2.0 working towards release, and 3.0.0
> roadmap planning well started, I believe it's time we take some time
> to review the status of Karaf 2.1.4.
>
> According to JIRA we have 11 resolved issues on the 2.1.x branch,
> perhaps we should consider rolling up a release? There is currently no
> other open issues listed for 2.1.4.
>
> -Jamie