You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by "tonio@starbridge.org" <to...@starbridge.org> on 2009/09/25 13:38:19 UTC
3.3.0 and sa-compile
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
i'm running SA 3.3.0 (3.3.0-alpha3-r808953) and i've some problem with
compiled rules.
sa-compile runs without errors, and SA seems to works fine when restarted.
But some body rules are now not detected.
exemple of simple body rule (for testing):
body TONIO_SPAM_TEST /toniospam/i
describe TONIO_SPAM_TEST Mentions Generic toniospamtest
score TONIO_SPAM_TEST 5
if i commented out
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody
in v320.pre, rules is working again.
I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody active.
I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same result.
Some info on my environnement:
debian testing
xsubpp version 2.200401 (from debian perl package)
re2c version 0.13.5-1
Thanks for your help
Regard
Tonio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkq8q6sACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIN9zwCg3s5HNL7DKUBRo8fTLbD6BsqV
aWMAoLnDI/+eABGST8KEG5todvABFUSF
=aDLE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
Posted by "tonio@starbridge.org" <to...@starbridge.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
McDonald, Dan a écrit :
> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 08:19 +0200, tonio@starbridge.org wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> tonio@starbridge.org a écrit :
>>> tonio@starbridge.org a écrit :
>>>> Benny Pedersen a écrit :
>>>>> On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "tonio@starbridge.org"
>>>>> wrote
>>>>>> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with
>>>>>> Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules
>>>>>> and compile again: same result.
>>>>> forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ?
>>>> sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in
>>>> debug)
>>> has anyone encountered the same problem ?
>
> Someone posted a problem with perl 5.6. What version of perl are
> you running?
>
thx for your answer
perl v5.10.0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkrCDtUACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIOPZgCfSY4GphHXEhWNolU7h0pYKcas
r8kAn1iP1rtNl9WHYPszFPBrpgpjECqv
=ccGX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
Posted by "McDonald, Dan" <Da...@austinenergy.com>.
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 08:19 +0200, tonio@starbridge.org wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> tonio@starbridge.org a écrit :
> > tonio@starbridge.org a écrit :
> >> Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> >>> On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "tonio@starbridge.org" wrote
> >>>> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with
> >>>> Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and
> >>>> compile again: same result.
> >>> forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ?
> >> sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug)
> > has anyone encountered the same problem ?
Someone posted a problem with perl 5.6. What version of perl are you
running?
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX
www.austinenergy.com
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
Posted by "tonio@starbridge.org" <to...@starbridge.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
tonio@starbridge.org a écrit :
> tonio@starbridge.org a écrit :
>> Benny Pedersen a écrit :
>>> On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "tonio@starbridge.org" wrote
>>>> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with
>>>> Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and
>>>> compile again: same result.
>>> forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ?
>> sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug)
> has anyone encountered the same problem ?
nobody ?
i really need help on this one
thx
Regards
Tonio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkrBpuIACgkQ8FtMlUNHQINEvwCg27ECYMTslFW1K80srvM5SdB3
YB0AoIytnseU1nW6iqlRasCNTCNFjrQW
=tjQR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
Posted by "tonio@starbridge.org" <to...@starbridge.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
tonio@starbridge.org a écrit :
> Benny Pedersen a écrit :
>> On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "tonio@starbridge.org" wrote
>
>>> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with
>>> Rule2XSBody active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and
>>> compile again: same result.
>> forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ?
>
> sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug)
has anyone encountered the same problem ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkq9zccACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIMA4wCeK5STV5P49zdRhMgdy9saHmfq
a4oAoNdduS36HIID3G38afVydbgxBhgb
=D8Ng
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@verizon.net>.
tonio@starbridge.org wrote:
> Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> > On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "tonio@starbridge.org" wrote
>
> >> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody
> >> active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again:
> >> same result.
> > forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ?
>
> sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug)
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
Posted by "tonio@starbridge.org" <to...@starbridge.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "tonio@starbridge.org" wrote
>
>> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody
>> active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again:
>> same result.
>
> forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ?
>
sa-compile has been run correctly with no errors (even in debug)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkq8syMACgkQ8FtMlUNHQIP2+wCdGgQpUR/MLpHT8hdW+4ooARAP
bYIAnRHf2xM7QeUE1HGWirN3OTTovnVW
=tO8Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: 3.3.0 and sa-compile
Posted by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.org>.
On fre 25 sep 2009 13:38:19 CEST, "tonio@starbridge.org" wrote
> I've tested with SA 3.2.5 and it's working fine with Rule2XSBody
> active. I've tried to delete compiled rules and compile again: same
> result.
forget to sa-compile in 3.3 ?
--
xpoint