You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2002/06/23 20:05:26 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10163] New: - struts-validator.war, set-property documentation/example are conflicting

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10163>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10163

struts-validator.war, set-property documentation/example are conflicting

           Summary: struts-validator.war, set-property documentation/example
                    are conflicting
           Product: Struts
           Version: Nightly Build
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: Example
        AssignedTo: struts-dev@jakarta.apache.org
        ReportedBy: matt@raibledesigns.com


I downloaded the 6.22 nightly build of Struts and noticed some conflicting
statements in the Validator.

In struts-validator/WEB-INF/struts-config.xml, there is:

    <set-property property="pathnames" value="/WEB-INF/validator-rules.xml,
                                              /WEB-INF/validation.xml"/>

But in validator-rules.xml, in the comments, it specifies:

      <plug-in className="org.apache.struts.validator.ValidatorPlugIn">
        <set-property property="pathname"
value="/WEB-INF/validator-rules.xml"/>
        <set-property property="pathname" value="/WEB-INF/validation.xml"/>
      </plug-in>

The first method seems to work, while the second does not.  With the second, I 
end up with this extra code:

// End -->
</SCRIPT>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>