Re: Go ahead with CDI 1.1

[Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>]

PS: here is the current diff
https://gist.github.com/rmannibucau/9c73a1fc81f3b73a8672

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*



2013/4/11 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>

> Hi
>
> Just to let everyone know i started to integrate 1.2 in tomee 1.6 to see
> if it fits. Still in progress to see damages but id like to get a tomee
> release with this codebase
> Le 11 avr. 2013 19:12, "Arne Limburg" <ar...@openknowledge.de> a
> écrit :
>
>  Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to go ahead and implement CDI 1.1 on the OWB 1.2 stream.
>> I wonder, if some of the java ee container implementors want to use the
>> 1.2 stream in a pre java ee 7 release.
>> If so, I would like to find a way to do this. Maybe this would be
>> possible with a maven profile and some maven hacking (has someone used the
>> maven-replacer-plugin?).
>> If no one is interested in a CDI 1.0 OWB 1.2 stream, we directly can go
>> ahead and implement CDI 1.1
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Arne
>>
>